Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Jet Linx, XOJet Partner w/CAE & SWA >

Jet Linx, XOJet Partner w/CAE & SWA

Search
Notices

Jet Linx, XOJet Partner w/CAE & SWA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2019, 10:53 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,611
Default

Originally Posted by MOGuy View Post
Any less risk than being stuck at Skywest or Envoy? We have had pilots and are still are having pilots picked up by SWA, Delta, UAL, AA, FX, and JB. Like it or not XO has a name in the industry and we produce excellent pilots who work at a place where the culture fits SWA 10 fold over your run of the mill regional pilot.
I’d rather you guys get hired ten fold over the F-teeners that run this place.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 08-02-2019, 11:00 AM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
FleetSnarl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by Skyward View Post
Make no mistake, this has to do with Contract negotiations coming up. The union and membership has more leverage if attracting a limited supply of qualified pilots is a concern. If the company can tout an eager supply of pilots, then some of that leverage is lost. This is a move to get a yes vote IMO.
That's exactly what this is about. Take an informal poll of pilots on the line at SWA and ask them what they think our leverage is in negotiations. Probably 80%+ will say "pilot shortage" as the number one thing or in the top couple of things.

Starting an ab initio program allows the company to fire back at us, and say, "What pilot shortage? We've addressed that. We've got XXXX number of people signed up for our ab initio program. No pilot shortage here. Next?"

Basically, this is management's way of neutralizing one of our strongest points of perceived leverage and taking the wind out of the sails of the vast majority of guys who think management should bend to our asks because, if they don't, nobody will want to work here.
FleetSnarl is offline  
Old 08-02-2019, 11:01 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,611
Default

Originally Posted by FleetSnarl View Post
That's exactly what this is about. Take an informal poll of pilots on the line at SWA and ask them what they think our leverage is in negotiations. Probably 80%+ will say "pilot shortage" as the number one thing or in the top couple of things.

Starting an ab initio program allows the company to fire back at us, and say, "What pilot shortage? We've addressed that. We've got XXXX number of people signed up for our ab initio program. No pilot shortage here. Next?"

Basically, this is management's way of neutralizing one of our strongest points of perceived leverage and taking the wind out of the sails of the vast majority of guys who think management should bend to our asks because, if they don't, nobody will want to work here.
Which is why we need to be smarter and see right through this bologna.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 08-02-2019, 11:33 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,003
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER View Post
Which is why we need to be smarter and see right through this bologna.
Sadly, only a small percentage will see it, as usual.
SlipKid is offline  
Old 08-02-2019, 12:02 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
FleetSnarl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by SlipKid View Post
Sadly, only a small percentage will see it, as usual.
Yep. OTOF, one guy's main issue with it is something about his favorite aviation school in Oklahoma isn't participating in the program. Oy vey. SAIEW. Most guys main concern is that the pilots coming out of the program will be sub-par (fair enough).

Few are expressing concern about why management is doing it now, seven months before negotiations open (enough time to enroll the program with enough "cadets" for management to be able to point to it as a pipeline of future pilots that nullifies any real concern of a pilot shortage).

Once negotiations open, management will say, "We've got X number of cadets signed up for the program. Our future hiring needs will be largely met by those X cadets. We don't see a pilot shortage." The NMB will turn to the union and say, "What do you got?"

Meanwhile, management will have been working on the pilot group via their propaganda machine (which is very effective). They'll publish facts and figures on projected hiring and how many cadets are coming through the program. They'll have the chiefs and their mouthpieces delivering the same message. Most will buy it and begin to think we don't have nearly as much bargaining power as we thought we did. Better vote yes before a recession comes along (or if already in a recession, before it gets worse).

Management is so, so, so far out ahead of the pilot group, it's kind of mind-boggling.
FleetSnarl is offline  
Old 08-02-2019, 12:17 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 298
Default

They will be graduating into the greater industry pilot shortage. Just because they get a SWA interview, doesn’t mean they will want to come here. SWA still needs to be an attractive destination or these guys will be looking elsewhere- or leaving SWA within a couple years for greener pastures. I don’t see where it changes anything.
RckyMtHigh is offline  
Old 08-02-2019, 01:03 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 952
Default

I read some more about this. It has a mentorship with a current SWA pilot.

How does one get to be a mentor? Is there a minimum number of flag ties to own or minimum sick bank or swag balance?
Zard is online now  
Old 08-02-2019, 01:16 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
FleetSnarl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by RckyMtHigh View Post
They will be graduating into the greater industry pilot shortage. Just because they get a SWA interview, doesn’t mean they will want to come here. SWA still needs to be an attractive destination or these guys will be looking elsewhere- or leaving SWA within a couple years for greener pastures. I don’t see where it changes anything.
We like to think we're smarter than management. We're the most profitable airline in history. Management is not stupid.

Ask yourself why would they go to the time, expense, and trouble of setting up this program, if there was nothing in it for them? In fact, under their description of the ab initio cadet program, they specifically say why they're doing it: so that they can have a pipeline in the future in the face of a pilot shortage. We can be assured that they've costed this out and it's a net win for them.

People smarter than me have pointed out that SWA specializes in "desperation hiring". That is, they hire people who will subsequently feel a debt of gratitude toward SWA for rescuing them from whatever not-so-great circumstance: they were furloughed, they were at a sh***y regional, they were at a cr***y cargo or foreign carrier, they were military and sick of career worries and TDY's. The ab initio program is simply a version of that. They take a "zero" and over the course of a few years full of marination in SWA culture (assigned a pilot mentor, jumpseat rides, regular visits to DAL), they become a "hero" SWA pilot.

If you can't see how this makes a difference, then you're kind of proving SlipKid's point that only a few will see what's going on. The company will be able to bank on a steady supply of incoming pilots. They will be able to make that argument to themselves, to the NMB, and to a substantial portion of the pilot group.
FleetSnarl is offline  
Old 08-02-2019, 01:55 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

This is undeniably a defensive move on the kompany's part to help out with the shorter supply of pilots they see coming over the next decade. But to call this a 'pipeline' from the likes of Swift, XO, et all, is something of an exaggeration. Soda straw seems more accurate considering the size of these operators vs. the staffing needs of SWA.
Smokey23 is offline  
Old 08-02-2019, 04:31 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 298
Default

Originally Posted by FleetSnarl View Post
We like to think we're smarter than management. We're the most profitable airline in history. Management is not stupid.

Ask yourself why would they go to the time, expense, and trouble of setting up this program, if there was nothing in it for them? In fact, under their description of the ab initio cadet program, they specifically say why they're doing it: so that they can have a pipeline in the future in the face of a pilot shortage. We can be assured that they've costed this out and it's a net win for them.

People smarter than me have pointed out that SWA specializes in "desperation hiring". That is, they hire people who will subsequently feel a debt of gratitude toward SWA for rescuing them from whatever not-so-great circumstance: they were furloughed, they were at a sh***y regional, they were at a cr***y cargo or foreign carrier, they were military and sick of career worries and TDY's. The ab initio program is simply a version of that. They take a "zero" and over the course of a few years full of marination in SWA culture (assigned a pilot mentor, jumpseat rides, regular visits to DAL), they become a "hero" SWA pilot.

If you can't see how this makes a difference, then you're kind of proving SlipKid's point that only a few will see what's going on. The company will be able to bank on a steady supply of incoming pilots. They will be able to make that argument to themselves, to the NMB, and to a substantial portion of the pilot group.
It doesn’t matter to me what management is doing. If they think that this will cause me to accept a lesser contract, they are dead wrong. The old guard is on it’s way out. A large majority of the guys hired in the last 5 years are not desperation hires and are not going to accept a sub-par contract.
RckyMtHigh is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Barrel Roll 135
Corporate
10
03-22-2014 05:19 PM
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM
MDT06
Major
32
07-16-2008 06:37 PM
vagabond
Major
9
06-19-2008 02:15 PM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
0
11-06-2006 06:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices