Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Alright. What’s Going On? >

Alright. What’s Going On?

Search
Notices

Alright. What’s Going On?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2024, 10:52 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,443
Default

Panic! Mayhem in the streets! Dire warnings!
Bet we have a profitable quarter and a profitable year. Demand is down and airplanes aren't coming in like they planned or replanned or even the third revision lf the plan. This has happened in the past and it has been a big nothing burger.
The company is fine. The company is going to be fine. You are all going to be fine. The world isn't ending. They are engaged in the age old sorcery of cutting costs and issuing lowball guidance so that they can all pop champagne bottles at the end of the year and say "see, it isn't as bad as we thought! We crushed it with our superior managing!" Followed by awarding themselves stock grants.

I would be very suprised if we made any moves other than waiting for the aircraft to be delivered and cranking hiring back up when they finally get here. Having a single type is a hallmark of this company and I don't think they are ready to abandon that risk for the additional costs that it incurs.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 03-16-2024, 01:48 PM
  #12  
At your mom's house
 
hoover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: cpt 737
Posts: 2,661
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot View Post
Panic! Mayhem in the streets! Dire warnings!
Bet we have a profitable quarter and a profitable year. Demand is down and airplanes aren't coming in like they planned or replanned or even the third revision lf the plan. This has happened in the past and it has been a big nothing burger.
The company is fine. The company is going to be fine. You are all going to be fine. The world isn't ending. They are engaged in the age old sorcery of cutting costs and issuing lowball guidance so that they can all pop champagne bottles at the end of the year and say "see, it isn't as bad as we thought! We crushed it with our superior managing!" Followed by awarding themselves stock grants.

I would be very suprised if we made any moves other than waiting for the aircraft to be delivered and cranking hiring back up when they finally get here. Having a single type is a hallmark of this company and I don't think they are ready to abandon that risk for the additional costs that it incurs.
if they announce they're stopping dividends and stock buy backs then I'd be worried
hoover is offline  
Old 03-16-2024, 02:31 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 144
Default

Perhaps another BOD or activist investor if kompany starts to bleed. The re-statement will not be pretty. Watch the put-call ratio.
Noconcessions is offline  
Old 03-16-2024, 02:41 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Noisecanceller View Post
Spirit has many airbus
The A320/21 NEO is teetering on the edge of a grounding. The gearbox issue is not going away. Spirit projects 25% of their fleet grounded by Dec. If one of the gearboxes let's loose in flight all bets are off.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-17-2024, 06:11 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 276
Default

The plan is there is no plan other than to wait for Boeing to get the MAX7 certified. What if it doesn't? Well....they don't have a Plan B clearly. My opinion is they will wait for the MAX7 and the only Airline they would want to merge with would be the combined Alaska/Hawaiian after they rid themselves of the Busses and 717's. The only new Airframe outside of the 737 that this management team would consider is most likely the 787 after they have studied what a near peer competitor does with them. This is Southwest management's MO. They did this when they started International service. They said we studied how AirTran did it and then implemented it into Southwest operations. They will do the same thing with the 787 down the road if they decide to pull the trigger on Alaska. I don't see them buying an Airbus carrier because I don't think they would have any idea how to integrate a massive fleet of Airbusses into our point to point route network along with all of the scheduling nightmares it would cause them from a crew scheduling perspective.
Salukidawg is offline  
Old 03-17-2024, 09:33 AM
  #16  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 4
Default

Second Type....A-220....I think we could handle it now.

Who has orders? Isnt doing that great...CEO sold to us before.....Breaze.

Just hope they keep the PVD Base.
Islanddriver is offline  
Old 03-17-2024, 10:29 AM
  #17  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
Default

Originally Posted by docav8tor View Post
If Southwest wanted to acquire another airline, which would it target?

If Southwest wanted to acquire another airline, which would it target?

Evan Hoopferhttps://media.bizj.us/view/img/11282341/southwest-airlines-737-jd57097*900xx2935-1651-0-206.jpgSome in the industry think the time is near for Southwest Airlines to look at non-organic growth opportunities.
Jake DeanGary Kelly, chairman and chief executive of Southwest Airlines, has been asked different variations of the same question during the last few quarterly earnings calls.

The question centers around the grounding of the 737 Max made by Boeing Co. (NYSE: BA) and how long Southwest Airlines Co. (NYSE: LUV) will tolerate not growing and ceding market share to competitors.

Southwest has hundreds of 737 Max planes on order, and frustration is mounting at the Dallas-based carrier.

FREE FOR PREMIUM MEMBERS

Live Webinar Future of Cities with Richard Florida

Use code MEMBERFOC24 to reveal your free ticket

SAVE MY SPOT

"We put our future in the hands of Boeing and the Max, and we're grounded," Kelly said in a CNBC interview recently.

The grounding has breathed life into speculation that's been circulating for years — is this the time for Southwest to buy another airline?

Fleet diversification

During Southwest's latest call discussing third quarter earnings on Oct. 24, Jamie Baker, an analyst with JP Morgan, asked Kelly about his comments on CNBC earlier in the day. Kelly said the board had asked him to review the carrier's strategy of exclusively using 737s.

As Baker brought up on the call, there are a couple of ways to go about diversifying the fleet type. One is to get in line with Airbus and wait several years for orders of new narrow-body planes. Or, Southwest could buy an existing Airbus operator.

"Is it safe to assume that if the board is debating a second fleet type, as you said today, it's also debating consolidation? Or, is it somehow possible to divorce those two topics?" Baker asked. "Because in my mind, they're highly intertwined."

Like previous answers Kelly has given on the consolidation possibility, he was equivocal in his answer. Southwest has a policy not to comment on potential M&A activity.

"They are potentially intertwined, but they could also be disaggregated," Kelly responded. "I think it just depends on how one wants to think about it."

Other analysts are wondering the same thing.

Analysts at Stifel recently went as far as to downgrade Southwest from 'Buy' to 'Hold' based on the concern Southwest would pursue an acquisition in light of the 737 Max's grounding.

Airlines went through considerable consolidation after the 9/11 terrorist attacks rocked the industry.

At a pilots conference this fall, a group of analysts was asked if there's any more room for consolidation in the industry.

"My answer is 'yes,'" Baker said. "And whatever the next deal is, I expect Southwest to be at that table."

Which airline would Southwest buy?

If Southwest wanted to acquire another carrier, it might have better luck than the three legacy airlines.

Delta, United and American each went through their own megamergers this century and are all now comparably sized. Industry experts think it unlikely regulators would allow one of the Big 3 to become the dominant U.S. carrier through non-organic growth.

When those experts are asked which airline Southwest would target in an acquisition, a range of possibilities emerge.

"I think the easiest target might be Alaska," said Jim Simmons, a professor who studies aviation at Metropolitan State University of Denver.

"You could see either a Spirit or Frontier being an interesting combination," said Bob Mann, an airline industry analyst.

"While Alaska is a better network-fit for Southwest, JetBlue better solves its desire to get A320 exposure," Joe DeNardi, another industry analyst, wrote in a recent research note.

It comes down to what Southwest would prioritize in a partner with each coming with their own challenges.

Spirit's business model is heavily dependent on ancillary fee revenue from bags, while Southwest's 'Bags Fly Free' policy is a hallmark of the company.

The average fare on a Southwest flight was $151.64 in 2018, according to regulatory filings. The average ticket price on a Spirit flight last year was $58.14, according to filings, while the average non-ticket revenue per passenger averaged $55.23.

Alaska's network might have the most overlap with Southwest's since the carrier is concentrated on the West Coast and Southwest is already the largest carrier in the state of California. Plus, Alaska has a limited number of Airbus planes in its fleet if diversification was something Southwest desired.

JetBlue would bring over dozens of Airbus aircraft, but Southwest wouldn't be able to realize fleet diversification benefits overnight. Such a merger would likely go through months of scrutinization by regulators while Southwest continues to be hamstrung by the lack of 737 Max planes in its fleet throughout the rest of 2019 and into 2020.

Here's what Southwest would look like combined with Alaska Air Group Inc. (NYSE: ALK), JetBlue Airways Corp. (Nasdaq: JBLU) and Spirit Airlines Inc. (Nasdaq: SAVE).

Do they want to?

Acquisitions are not foreign to Southwest. In May 2011, Southwest closed on its $3.2 billion purchase of AirTran Airways, which at the time raised revenue by more than 21 percent.

From a network perspective, the deal gave Southwest access to new markets, like Atlanta, and strengthened Southwest's presence in Baltimore. However, some think the acquisition didn't go entirely according to plan.

"I think it took longer than they expected, and it was more expensive than they expected," Mann said. "Beyond getting into Atlanta in a big way, it didn't really achieve any new market coverage."

Airline mergers are complicated and messy. It takes years to integrate key systems and standardize processes. One of the big factors Southwest would have to consider is altering its culture too much, which is known throughout the industry as being one of the strongest.

Bringing on another few thousand employees from a different company with different pay scales, different unions and different work expectations might disrupt the culture Co-founder and longtime leader Herb Kelleher worked to instill and that Kelly wants to continue.

"It's almost cult-like, and I don't mean that necessarily in a negative way," Brett Snyder, an industry expert who runs the Cranky Flier blog, said about Southwest's culture. "It's an important attribute for the airline. You'll hear Gary Kelly say that over and over again. Maybe future management would stray further away a little bit and take more risks. But, they seem to put culture toward the top of what matters when they're doing things."
This was from 2019 just to clarify
pchansen is offline  
Old 03-17-2024, 11:21 AM
  #18  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
The A320/21 NEO is teetering on the edge of a grounding. The gearbox issue is not going away. Spirit projects 25% of their fleet grounded by Dec. If one of the gearboxes let's loose in flight all bets are off.
None of the NEO problems have anything to do with the gearbox. It is a HPT disc coating issue. You might not know it, but most jet engines have high pressure turbines....
"In July, RTX said microscopic contaminants were found in a powdered metal used in high-pressure turbine discs that are part of the GTF engine's core. The presence of those contaminants could lead to cracks in the engine."
symbian simian is offline  
Old 03-17-2024, 01:00 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,510
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian View Post
None of the NEO problems have anything to do with the gearbox. It is a HPT disc coating issue. You might not know it, but most jet engines have high pressure turbines....
"In July, RTX said microscopic contaminants were found in a powdered metal used in high-pressure turbine discs that are part of the GTF engine's core. The presence of those contaminants could lead to cracks in the engine."
Addtionally, it's an issue specific to Pratt NEO engines manufactured in a certain year range. Has nothing to do with Airbus 320/321's NEOs generally speaking. As long as your engines are not in that date range, or not Pratts, everything is fine and dandy...
Tranquility is offline  
Old 03-17-2024, 04:38 PM
  #20  
weekends off? Nope...
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,941
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility View Post
Addtionally, it's an issue specific to Pratt NEO engines manufactured in a certain year range. Has nothing to do with Airbus 320/321's NEOs generally speaking. As long as your engines are not in that date range, or not Pratts, everything is fine and dandy...
leaps FTW???
Smooth at FL450 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dragonslayer69
Frontier
133
03-14-2024 06:07 PM
Halon1211
Spirit
35
03-10-2024 08:39 PM
MaxMar
United
71
10-10-2023 03:43 AM
smokenmirrors
American
0
09-27-2023 11:58 AM
saab2000
Regional
20
06-04-2007 08:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices