Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
WN Ceasing Operations In Three Cities >

WN Ceasing Operations In Three Cities

Search

Notices

WN Ceasing Operations In Three Cities

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2013, 05:14 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,665
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Only their new 800s have the short field package that you describe.
I know we don't have it at AT. I don't think SW does either. 24K jets btw.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 12-21-2013, 05:53 PM
  #32  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
I know we don't have it at AT. I don't think SW does either. 24K jets btw.
Is SW not getting the -7BE engines at 28.4K? Figured they would do that for interchangeability with their new jets.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 12-21-2013, 07:05 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,665
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Is SW not getting the -7BE engines at 28.4K? Figured they would do that for interchangeability with their new jets.
Not really sure.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 12-21-2013, 08:07 PM
  #34  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Is SW not getting the -7BE engines at 28.4K? Figured they would do that for interchangeability with their new jets.
Most of their 700s are the 24k motors. There might be a few with the 27k engines.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 12-22-2013, 03:13 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 445
Default

The problem with EYW is not the aircraft or takeoff but a landing issue, and that has to do with SWA's definition of wet runway. From what we have been told AirTran and Delta have a definition, basically due to grooved runways, that allowed EWY to be considered dry when there was rain. The POI for SWA won't allow the OpSpecs to be changed due to SWA "being a distressed carrier due to the merger."
So when it rains at EWY the runway is wet and the max landing weight only allows about 100 pax to be flown in, considering you also need to have fuel for an alternate.
tanker is offline  
Old 12-22-2013, 07:04 AM
  #36  
Working weekends
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

the bigger issue, the forest (not the trees: runway length ) is they are pulling out, while others stay.

In sports this is called, throwing in the towel.
satpak77 is offline  
Old 12-22-2013, 07:10 PM
  #37  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by tanker
The problem with EYW is not the aircraft or takeoff but a landing issue, and that has to do with SWA's definition of wet runway. From what we have been told AirTran and Delta have a definition, basically due to grooved runways, that allowed EWY to be considered dry when there was rain. The POI for SWA won't allow the OpSpecs to be changed due to SWA "being a distressed carrier due to the merger."
So when it rains at EWY the runway is wet and the max landing weight only allows about 100 pax to be flown in, considering you also need to have fuel for an alternate.
The 737 always has to use wet numbers for takeoff when its been raining due to aircraft certification... grooved or not. The A320 series is the same.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 12-23-2013, 03:20 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The 737 always has to use wet numbers for takeoff when its been raining due to aircraft certification... grooved or not.
That's not the case at AirTran.
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Old 12-23-2013, 07:08 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rolf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 657
Default

That would explain the difference.
Merry Christmas all,

Rolf
Rolf is offline  
Old 12-23-2013, 10:37 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
4th Level's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 323
Default

due to grooved runways, that allowed EWY to be considered dry when there was rain.
Exactly. It's called skid resistant runway data. Boeing has it. If runway is grooved, it is essentially considered "dry" for takeoff and landing data.


The POI for SWA won't allow the OpSpecs to be changed due to SWA "being a distressed carrier due to the merger."
Ironic isn't it?

We buy Airtran and gain access to EWY.

We then have to close EWY - because we bought Airtran.
4th Level is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
P-3Bubba
Major
174
04-23-2014 06:14 AM
skylover
Aviation Law
482
11-14-2013 08:20 PM
Jayhawkfan
Cargo
0
07-12-2006 05:51 PM
Freighter Captain
Major
0
02-14-2006 11:34 PM
Freighter Captain
Major
2
06-10-2005 11:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices