Search
Notices

SL 10 Grievance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-2014, 08:55 AM
  #141  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

ATN MEC killed the first deal....Gary and SWAPA showed their horns...I voted no for #2.

It's the same over here, 90% of the spineless jerk offs that voted in favor will never admit it.

That's one of the reasons I wanted arbitration from the start. I didn't trust this pilot group to handle a decision involving my future seniority and QOL. Turns out I was right. That doesn't happen very often.
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Old 11-04-2014, 08:59 AM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

As an aside, the same aforementioned jerk offs are now suing ALPA over the decision to reject the first deal. Their case is going nowhere. At least I'll get a little satisfaction knowing they each pi$$ed a few grand away. Dumbasses.
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Old 11-04-2014, 09:20 AM
  #143  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by OrionTanker View Post
Whack and Rizzo - one question and one question only (not going to look at old threads on the answers)

How did you vote on both SL9 and 10?

I voted no on both. If either one of you voted yes either time, stop the rant. If you voted no both times - congratulations. Continue with your ranting.

Have a nice day....
Im a little curious why you chose to vote no. Care to elaborate?
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Old 11-04-2014, 10:26 AM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Rizzo View Post
According to your definition, ALPA preformed due diligence.

Our "expectations and understandings" were negotiations, mediation, arbitration as agreed to. Certianly SW was capable of "fulfilling the conditions and requirements of the agreement"
You're expectations should have been NEVER going to arbitration since an alternative method of gaining an integrated seniority list was exactly what all parties agreed to in the process agreement.


WHEREAS, Section 13(b) of Allegheny-Mohawk authorizes the Parties to utilize an agreed-upon alternative method to resolve the seniority integration issues; and

WHEREAS, Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (“SWAPA”), the Air Line Pilots Association (“ALPA”), Southwest and AirTran desire to utilize an alternative process as set forth in this Agreement for the creation of an Integrated Master Seniority List;
shoelu is offline  
Old 11-04-2014, 10:44 AM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 441
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Rizzo View Post
You must have a very understanding doctor. I looked at the plan documents and colonoscopies are specifically exempted. It probably depends if it's routine or diagnostic. $500 for the rest of those procedures are a fraction of what I'd have thought.
It has nothing to do with an understanding doctor, if the procedure is not preventative it is covered under the SWA Regular Plan. In my case my Dad died of colon cancer, so I have a family history that caused the first to be diagnostic. Since then they have been done to keep track of polyps that were discovered. In my wife's case she is diagnosed with IBS, so colos are diagnostic.
tanker is offline  
Old 11-04-2014, 10:49 AM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
4th Level's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 323
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Rizzo View Post
Im a little curious why you chose to vote no. Care to elaborate?
Probably for the same reasons I did. I was against the acquisition from the start, and I didn't want to streamline the process for Unka Gary anymore than was already happening. It was going to happen, but not with my endorsement.
4th Level is offline  
Old 11-04-2014, 01:04 PM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frank Rizzo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 717 Capt.
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu View Post
You're expectations should have been NEVER going to arbitration since an alternative method of gaining an integrated seniority list was exactly what all parties agreed to in the process agreement.

So using your logic, "alternate method" allows management to use fraud in the inducement (threats of unemployment) to gain an unfair advantage in negotiations?
Frank Rizzo is offline  
Old 11-04-2014, 06:30 PM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 127
Default

Rizzo - I voted not because I am a line pilot, period. My loyalties are to the line pilot. No one else. I knew my union or your past union were not going to help anyone except the union workers, i.e. not the line pilot. That is the way of the past and future.

Most line pilots are good solid dudes who just fly from point A to point B. Get the paycheck and kiss their wives/girlfriends when they get home.

You can hate the union, but do not hate the guys on the forums. They are more than likely a line pilot. Most union reps and execs shy away from forums as this tarnishes their reputation. Just like a politician.

You should actually be proud of your ex-union when you voted to strike. You had unity. SWAPA has no unity.
OrionTanker is offline  
Old 11-04-2014, 08:43 PM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

Couple of points to ponder:

1)Ask virtually any original SWA pilot if this was a merger of equals, they will say heck no! Ask virtually any former ATN pilot if this was a merger of equals, they will say heck yes! All of the angst on both sides originates from this fundamental difference of views.

2)With every passing day, it is becoming ever more apparent that the #1 reason for SWA acquiring ATN was as a convenient means to eliminate a pesky competitor. Sucks, but it's just how the business evolves sometimes. Gaining access to the ATL was just icing on the cake. It seems clear now that SWA views the ATL as primarily an O&D market and not a hub, and is sizing the operation there accordingly (safe to say Delta is defending the motherland better than United has done in DEN....credit where credit is due, Richard.) Consider also that after all the dust has now settled, ATN pilots have only brought over one-third of "their" aircraft (and Captain's seats), yet ALL their pilots continue to be employed by SWA. That is definitely not nothing, but gets precious little acknowledgement from most ATN pilots. Any of you still think arbitration would have been a panacea with that fact now in the mixture? It would have come to light before arbitration was complete; no way Gary could have put off the deal with Delta for that long. It is also further evidence to me that Gary wasn't bluffing when he threatened to not integrate ATN with SWA. I believe he wanted ATN gone and was going to accomplish it the easy way (integration), or if need be, the much less pleasant way (fragmentation). 80% of your pilots voted in the best interests of their careers when their true lack of leverage came to light....and yep, they pretty much had a gun to their heads. 80% of our pilots also voted in what they thought was the best interests of their careers....and probably 50% of them now feel like chumps for not going to arbitration in light of what happened to the 717s.

3)Frank and Whack, I'm sorry that your cheese has been moved so much. I really am. But in the new consolidated airline landscape, it is a completely unrealistic assumption that ATN could have remained a stand-alone carrier. That's the perils of being a smaller fish in the big industry pond. ATN succeeded in the years leading up to the SWA purchase largely due to Delta's "lost decade" of big losses, bankruptcy, and merger. IOW, they were too distracted with bigger issues to put up an effective fight against ATN in the ATL. How do you think a stand-alone ATN would be holding up now to the new Delta? Be honest...
Maybe you would have fared better being acquired by an airline other than SWA....maybe not. JetBlue, Alaska, Hawaiian, Spirit, and Virgin are all likely in the same boat: most of them will not survive the next five years in their present state, IMHO. Heck, SWA might not even survive as a stand-alone. Never say never...

4)I wish the deal had never happened, either. It has transformed the airline in many ways that are not for the better. Senior management absolutely owns ALL the results, from the recent impressive financials to the crappy operational performance and withering employee relations. Hopefully over time it will prove to be a good strategic move....even though to a lot of us line-swine it sure feels like a tactical failure on several fronts right now.

Here's to just putting it all behind us now and hoping for better times to come. One LUV, baby!
Smokey23 is offline  
Old 11-05-2014, 09:42 AM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
4th Level's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 323
Default

Great post Smokey with one big notable exception;

Consider also that after all the dust has now settled
The dust in no way has settled, and the pain has yet to be felt on many fronts. It's tough to "put it behind you" when it hasn't happened yet.
4th Level is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyC
Cargo
32
05-08-2013 02:10 PM
Poppy
United
4
03-10-2013 08:03 PM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
Snarge
United
56
02-12-2013 06:33 AM
Underdog
Cargo
51
03-11-2011 11:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices