Search

Notices

Swa ta

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2015 | 11:07 AM
  #1  
Sr. Barco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Default Swa ta

Well, it's finally here. Let's discuss it. I'm a solid NO vote. Here's the short list why:

1) Weak bonus. Really? $16,000 for a topped out Captain!? The company is buying BILLIONS in stock and they can only give us $125m for a bonus? It needs to be doubled.
2) Weak 401k match. It's only 10% and it's a match. The other 3 legacies are getting a 15-16% contribution.
3) International codeshare relief which gives swapa the ability to waive protections in the contract. I don't trust SWAPA

What are you voting?
Reply
Old 09-19-2015 | 11:48 AM
  #2  
Reserve Sucks
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Hell no
Reply
Old 09-19-2015 | 12:13 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sr. Barco
Well, it's finally here. Let's discuss it. I'm a solid NO vote. Here's the short list why:

1) Weak bonus. Really? $16,000 for a topped out Captain!? The company is buying BILLIONS in stock and they can only give us $125m for a bonus? It needs to be doubled.
2) Weak 401k match. It's only 10% and it's a match. The other 3 legacies are getting a 15-16% contribution.
3) International codeshare relief which gives swapa the ability to waive protections in the contract. I don't trust SWAPA

What are you voting?
Good synopsis. To use Delta as a measuring stick, I believe they voted down theirs mostly because it was a trade. Pay raises for tougher profit sharing metrics. Feel free to correct me dal guys

What SWA is proposing is taking our code share( only they really know what that's worth) for 1.6% annual raises, sub market rate retirement and at risk profit sharing.
The best thing about this TA is how easy it is to select No as my vote
Reply
Old 09-19-2015 | 12:17 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Pretty simple. Section 1 gutted, 401K match increase of .7%!, Raises less than COLA and abysmal Reserve improvements... I think you know my answer.
Reply
Old 09-19-2015 | 12:30 PM
  #5  
Sr. Barco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Default

Oh and then there's this:

Memorandum of Understanding
It is hereby understood and agreed, by and between Southwest Airlines Co. and Southwest Airlines Pilots’ Association, that upon ratification of the Parties’ new collective bargaining agreement, the Parties through their designated representatives will initiate a joint study of the feasibility of an alternative automated bidding system. Upon completion of their joint study, the designated representatives will make recommendations to their respective organizations.

Looks like PBS in disguise to me.
Reply
Old 09-19-2015 | 12:37 PM
  #6  
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,573
Likes: 282
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Default

Originally Posted by 27 driver
Hell no
Hell ****!ng NO!!!!
Reply
Old 09-19-2015 | 12:43 PM
  #7  
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,573
Likes: 282
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Default

I'm fairly confident that it'll go down, but I just hope it goes down in a huge ball of flames (a la the FA 87% NO vote) so as to send a message to management that they're not even close to offering what we'll accept.

Then once it does it's time to start pulling out the USA Today ads and start punching them in the eye. The biggest thing we have going for us is a management that is ultra sensitive to bad press about their precious airline.
Reply
Old 09-19-2015 | 12:47 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Sr. Barco
Oh and then there's this:

Memorandum of Understanding
It is hereby understood and agreed, by and between Southwest Airlines Co. and Southwest Airlines Pilots’ Association, that upon ratification of the Parties’ new collective bargaining agreement, the Parties through their designated representatives will initiate a joint study of the feasibility of an alternative automated bidding system. Upon completion of their joint study, the designated representatives will make recommendations to their respective organizations.

Looks like PBS in disguise to me.
I forgot about that. This TA is so riddled with concessions, I cant recall them all during my short hunt for Easter turds. Not a fan of the multiple subsets either in regards to scheduling flexibility.
Reply
Old 09-19-2015 | 12:56 PM
  #9  
Window_Seat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sr. Barco
Well, it's finally here. Let's discuss it. I'm a solid NO vote. Here's the short list why:

1) Weak bonus. Really? $16,000 for a topped out Captain!? The company is buying BILLIONS in stock and they can only give us $125m for a bonus? It needs to be doubled.
2) Weak 401k match. It's only 10% and it's a match. The other 3 legacies are getting a 15-16% contribution.
3) International codeshare relief which gives swapa the ability to waive protections in the contract. I don't trust SWAPA

What are you voting?
I'd say #3 should be your #1 reason. Those worms will never go back into the can.
Reply
Old 09-19-2015 | 02:44 PM
  #10  
Logbook...
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Default

You had me at no.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brakes Set
Southwest
10
06-25-2012 10:03 PM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
brakechatter
Major
602
10-12-2010 11:54 AM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
SWAjet
Major
44
01-19-2006 12:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices