Miami Air
04-08-2017, 05:20 AM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 775
Miami Air
Miami Air Flying
In accordance with Section 1.B.2 of the CBA, the MEC was notified late this afternoon of Spirit's intent to enter into an agreement with Miami Air to operate FLL-LBE-FLL tonight and TPA-DTW-TPA tomorrow. The stated reason was they could not complete the scheduled flights as a result of three NEOs out of service and weather delayed operations.
Having a little problem running the Airline???
In accordance with Section 1.B.2 of the CBA, the MEC was notified late this afternoon of Spirit's intent to enter into an agreement with Miami Air to operate FLL-LBE-FLL tonight and TPA-DTW-TPA tomorrow. The stated reason was they could not complete the scheduled flights as a result of three NEOs out of service and weather delayed operations.
Having a little problem running the Airline???
04-08-2017, 02:54 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Originally Posted by Blaggock
Only going to get worse, between attrition, the inability to hire guys with the ability to get through this bare bones training and the majority of guys unwilling to help.
Let this hellhole of an airline burn to the ground.
Whoever was in charge of ordering those NEOS should be fired, along with Bendover and Jyrinul
Let this hellhole of an airline burn to the ground.
Whoever was in charge of ordering those NEOS should be fired, along with Bendover and Jyrinul
04-08-2017, 04:06 PM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Originally Posted by Blaggock
Wow, what amazing insight from such a knowledgeable managemt tool.
The fact you think 3 airplanes out of service warrants sub service shows how clueless you are
The fact you think 3 airplanes out of service warrants sub service shows how clueless you are
So what is it that makes me a management sympathizer? Is it pointing out the millennial entitlement where captains are required to pay for FO expenses while on trips, or pointing out that calling a "choker" on the phone is harassment, or pointing out that trying to organize a NO OT program is illegal? Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it's wrong, and doesn't make me a management sympathizer.
04-08-2017, 04:16 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Originally Posted by Blaggock
You're just an obnoxious tool, and I'm too old to be a millennial
Accusations with zero evidence - tool. Then again, I guess that's what we do here now.
04-08-2017, 04:27 PM
#7
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 775
Originally Posted by paidpnuts
You guys need to do some research on Bendo and how he handled the mechanics at northwest. This is suspiciously similar. Not on that scale but the idea.
04-08-2017, 05:06 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,902
Originally Posted by Super EZ E
I was there. Not anywhere near the same. Steenland had scab MX guys in Arizona trained ready to go when our boys walked out the door. The "replacements" showed up and the airline kept flying with scab MX! The Pilots dropped their pants so they could save the "oh mighty pension!!" AFA supported the MX and were willing to walk, not ALPA!
04-08-2017, 05:35 PM
#9
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
Obnoxious, sure, but I still don't see management sympathizer. I don't see any evidence of it in your reply, so as expected, you have nothing.
Accusations with zero evidence - tool. Then again, I guess that's what we do here now.
Accusations with zero evidence - tool. Then again, I guess that's what we do here now.
Seems that they're just collecting a check, a big fat one.
Hey Ram, First round it's on me!
04-08-2017, 05:51 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,114
I know this feels like another kick when we're down but this isn't the first time we've done this guys. North American was contracted 4-5 years ago with 757s to fly fll-lga-fll when we only had 587 and 588 and they were broken.
If we're going to make an issue about it be concerned about our contract language saying they can keep renewing 90 day contracts. That is what's scary.
If we're going to make an issue about it be concerned about our contract language saying they can keep renewing 90 day contracts. That is what's scary.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
