Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
What are you doing with Bendo's offer? >

What are you doing with Bendo's offer?

Search

Notices

What are you doing with Bendo's offer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2017 | 08:56 PM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
No red-eye plus 1, schedule integrity (reserves too!!), no ready reserve (United I believe has it), red-green, no involuntary junior manning/extensions.... There's probably more, but I'm sleepy...
What's red-eye plus 1 and red-green?
Reply
Old 09-14-2017 | 09:27 PM
  #52  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 663
Likes: 46
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
Ummmm okay...so IF during a downturn and 1/3 of the airlines just took concessionary contracts, I'm sure you'll be the first one to argue that the good contracts are irrelevant and we should strive for concessions also because those are the newest contracts and we should get the average of those. Hmmmm

Your housing example is just crazy!

Companies should pay fair market rate based on their segment of the industry. Market rate is whatever your competitors in your segment of the industry CURRENTLY pays.

To argue that, well... they're negotiating right now and will have a better contract soon thus we should compare ourselves to their next contract has as merit as the company saying, "well, 2 contracts from now Alaska/virgin will have a contract during a downturn so we'll use that as a baseline."

Face it, your union and the outspoken clowns has backed your position into a corner. For the sake of saving face at this point, I don't see y'all willing to come out and accept anything but legacy rates. And I believe the NMB will see the company's proposal as entirely reasonable and will stop any strike before it starts. Y'all are basically stuck in this hellhole of a stalemate for years to come.

Thank goodness there's full retro!!! Good luck!
How much do you get paid to write this crap? Enjoy your lonely life of crap my friend, I'm sure people love you everywhere you go.

Last edited by AllOva736; 09-14-2017 at 09:42 PM.
Reply
Old 09-15-2017 | 03:19 AM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Default

Meh...

I'll be patient. Nobody has backed me into any corner. I'll stick it out for as long as it takes to get a fair and equitable contract.
Reply
Old 09-15-2017 | 07:01 AM
  #54  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
Ummmm okay...so IF during a downturn and 1/3 of the airlines just took concessionary contracts, I'm sure you'll be the first one to argue that the good contracts are irrelevant and we should strive for concessions also because those are the newest contracts and we should get the average of those. Hmmmm
Sadly, that seems to be reality. I don't like it, and I won't advocate for it, but precedent is there. For reference, see Alaska's Kasher award back in 2005. The company was profitable, yet a bankruptcy-average contract was awarded. It sucked, but it happened.

Originally Posted by Feng
Your housing example is just crazy!
How so? You're trying to find the current value of something. Not the value of something from 2011. What houses are selling for NOW is what is relevant.

Originally Posted by Feng
Companies should pay fair market rate based on their segment of the industry. Market rate is whatever your competitors in your segment of the industry CURRENTLY pays.

To argue that, well... they're negotiating right now and will have a better contract soon thus we should compare ourselves to their next contract has as merit as the company saying, "well, 2 contracts from now Alaska/virgin will have a contract during a downturn so we'll use that as a baseline."
I think perhaps we've miscommunicated. I'm not trying to compare anything to future rates, just current rates. Contracts past their amendable date aren't "current," and don't make much sense for comparison. If we're going to do that, can I use Delta and United rates from 2000, corrected for inflation? Should an arbitrator deciding a contract at a narrowbody carrier use Spirit's current rates for comparison?
Reply
Old 09-15-2017 | 01:15 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 341
Default

Originally Posted by CRJoperator
You obviously don't know much if any about AA work rules..

- When a trip is cancelled you DO NOT go on reserve. If a 3 day trip is cancelled they can assign you another trip BUT only if it stays within the original footprint. Obviously with some contractual limitations.

I agree the 4 days off between trips is nice but other than that I can't find anything else.

That's called reserve! And there is no choice given, it's take this trip or leave it. If you decline it guess what, you lose all pay protection!
Reply
Old 09-15-2017 | 01:18 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 341
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800
How so? You're trying to find the current value of something. Not the value of something from 2011. What houses are selling for NOW is what is relevant.
Yes, what houses actually sold for. Not listed for which is what you are doing by comparing a contract that doesn't even have a T/A.

I can understand your viewpoint but that just isn't reality. The way to solve it is for a short contract length (3 years) and/or a "me too" trim up clause like at AA.
Reply
Old 09-15-2017 | 02:56 PM
  #57  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
That's called reserve! And there is no choice given, it's take this trip or leave it. If you decline it guess what, you lose all pay protection!
You must be USAirways or AWA.
Reply
Old 09-15-2017 | 03:03 PM
  #58  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
That's called reserve! And there is no choice given, it's take this trip or leave it. If you decline it guess what, you lose all pay protection!
You can refuse a trip as a line holder, what's your point? Former LUS or AWA? Regardless, not the approptiate thread to discuss AA stuff.
Reply
Old 09-15-2017 | 05:36 PM
  #59  
SourGrapes's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Planepirate
Meh...

I'll be patient. Nobody has backed me into any corner. I'll stick it out for as long as it takes to get a fair and equitable contract.
Reply
Old 09-16-2017 | 10:25 AM
  #60  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
Yes, what houses actually sold for. Not listed for which is what you are doing by comparing a contract that doesn't even have a T/A.

I can understand your viewpoint but that just isn't reality. The way to solve it is for a short contract length (3 years) and/or a "me too" trim up clause like at AA.
Which contracts was I making comparisons to that weren't even TA's yet? DAL/UAL/AMR/SWA/HAL/Allegiant are all post-ratification current contracts. Those are houses that have recently sold.

The others are the invalid numbers due to non-current contracts. Those are houses that are on the market but have not yet sold, and the only info available is what the purchase price was the previous time they were sold after the last real-estate bubble burst.

Comparing yourself to JetBlue/Alaska/Virgin/Frontier pre-TA rates is doing exactly what you're arguing against.

Last edited by pete2800; 09-16-2017 at 10:40 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
doz4dllrs
Major
151
03-29-2010 09:04 PM
EWRflyr
Major
1
12-16-2009 10:30 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
05-16-2005 06:00 PM
Freight Dog
Cargo
0
05-04-2005 01:43 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
0
05-04-2005 01:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices