![]() |
Spirit Training
I am curious how Spirit training would be for a 135 cargo pilot using a basic auto pilot and Garmin 430/530? Any insight will help.
|
Originally Posted by Kiwikid
(Post 2492854)
I am curious how Spirit training would be for a 135 cargo pilot using a basic auto pilot and Garmin 430/530? Any insight will help.
😂 Sorry man, couldn’t resist. My advice, not worth the risk. This program not set up for guys without prior 121 and automation. |
Originally Posted by Timeismoney
(Post 2492873)
[emoji23]
Sorry man, couldn’t resist. My advice, not worth the risk. This program not set up for guys without prior 121 and automation. If you don’t mind me asking what background did you have prior to your first 121 job? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Timeismoney
(Post 2492873)
😂
Sorry man, couldn’t resist. My advice, not worth the risk. This program not set up for guys without prior 121 and automation. |
Originally Posted by Kiwikid
(Post 2492910)
If you don’t mind me asking prior to being in 121 what was your pilot position?
|
Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
(Post 2492912)
I don't think he is saying that jumping to any 121 is a bad idea, just this one. The training program here is not designed for those without prior 121 experience. You literally do 4 sims and then a full pic check/type ride. Failures here currently are at an all time high. A pink slip is not worth it for this garbage company.
I was just wondering what is pre 121 experience was. I don’t think all 121s are garbage yet I would prefer to skip regionals but obviously may not. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
(Post 2492912)
I don't think he is saying that jumping to any 121 is a bad idea, just this one. The training program here is not designed for those without prior 121 experience. You literally do 4 sims and then a full pic check/type ride. Failures here currently are at an all time high. A pink slip is not worth it for this garbage company.
|
Originally Posted by Kiwikid
(Post 2492953)
I understand 121 carries are different I was just curious if there have been other 135 pilots go through Spirit and how the training was for them. I’ve been hired by another 121 just weighing my options.
|
Whether or not spirit is your final career destination (LOLZ show me the money Bob) you really may be better off going through a full training course at another 121 outfit first. You'll get better first year pay at many regionals and be better prepared to either come to spirit or any other major carrier after that year. $35k-ish at Spirit vs. $50k at a regional, plus more comprehensive training before hitting the line... A bunch of my friends passed on Spirit and went to regionals instead because of this and it's really hard to find fault in their reasoning. They'll be flying for United/Delta/SWA/FedEx/UPS as quickly as anyone coming from Spirit and they'll make $20-$30k more along the way during their first couple of years. Some started a year ago and will be logging PIC time making CA pay before Spirit pilots see a new contract.
That said, if you study hard before even showing up for training, yea you can get through it with no prior 121 experience. The odds are against you and if your first ever V1 cut is when they show it to you in the sim before your checkride, then you're going to need to be well prepared to do that pilot shxt before you get here. Feeling lucky? |
Thanks for the insight it does seem like a regional is the safer option. I have been flying as a CA for the past 2 years and am familiar with PIC checkrides. Just know 121 is much different than 135 esp. the automation etc.
|
So is it possible that Scaring Away Potential Applicants is the new, company baited Job Action, and we are once again falling into their trap?
I mean, they don't *really* want to reach a deal this week, they're just demonstrating good faith until they can hit us with another justifiable stall. There's been a lot of this recently, especially by first time posters like this. I say be careful. And now I'll remove my tin foil hat. |
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 2493238)
So is it possible that Scaring Away Potential Applicants is the new, company baited Job Action, and we are once again falling into their trap?
I mean, they don't *really* want to reach a deal this week, they're just demonstrating good faith until they can hit us with another justifiable stall. There's been a lot of this recently, especially by first time posters like this. I say be careful. And now I'll remove my tin foil hat. |
Originally Posted by Kiwikid
(Post 2493368)
I noticed you went from 1900, 145, then 320 airframes how did you find the transition? I’m a metro driver just trying to get well rounded replies to make an educated decision. Thanks
|
Originally Posted by AllOva736
(Post 2493413)
Plenty of people came here from 135 and made it through and plenty of people have come here from 121 and failed. It's not a good training program and it's much tougher than it should be. There is no cut and dry reason people succeed here other than being very prepared on day 1.
|
Personally, there were certain difficulties in all of them. (I have a 737-200 type as well.) An airplane is an airplane, but going from Cessnas and Pipers to a 1900 was difficult because it was my first systems intensive airplane and they expected us to be able to build one.
Going from 1900 - E145, the glass and automation took some getting used to, but the information is still the same. (This is where you will slot in, coming from a Metro.) Mostly it was difficult because my sims were at 2:30AM. The 737-200 was very primitive, but even though it was a shotgun cockpit, as opposed to the glass of the 145, you almost forget about it as soon as you start flying. I told myself, "I did it on the Beech, I can do it here." The A320's difficulties (for me) were because while the cockpit is very similar to the E145, it's automation worked kinda opposite of the E145. I'd been on the E145 so long that it was hard to just memory dump it. Not having to un-learn an old automation philosophy, you might be at an advantage, but it could be the most difficult part of learning an Airbus, I don't know. Training for me was fine, but putting the new methods to work on the line, combined with lack of tactile feedback from the flight controls in landing, was where I struggled. |
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 2493440)
Personally, there were certain difficulties in all of them. (I have a 737-200 type as well.) An airplane is an airplane, but going from Cessnas and Pipers to a 1900 was difficult because it was my first systems intensive airplane and they expected us to be able to build one.
Going from 1900 - E145, the glass and automation took some getting used to, but the information is still the same. (This is where you will slot in, coming from a Metro.) Mostly it was difficult because my sims were at 2:30AM. The 737-200 was very primitive, but even though it was a shotgun cockpit, as opposed to the glass of the 145, you almost forget about it as soon as you start flying. I told myself, "I did it on the Beech, I can do it here." The A320's difficulties (for me) were because while the cockpit is very similar to the E145, it's automation worked kinda opposite of the E145. I'd been on the E145 so long that it was hard to just memory dump it. Not having to un-learn an old automation philosophy, you might be at an advantage, but it could be the most difficult part of learning an Airbus, I don't know. Training for me was fine, but putting the new methods to work on the line, combined with lack of tactile feedback from the flight controls in landing, was where I struggled. |
If you live in South Florida contact AeroStar, I believe they will let you observe an A320 sim training session for a few hundred $. Or if your company has a jumpseat capability, try and catch a ride on one.
Might be worth it, but as a previous poster suggested. Go to a regional especially one with E170/175's. I transitioned from C172 G1000 to Caravan G1000 to Embraer E175. I've jumpseated on older A320's and looks like my E175 FO job easier. |
I know the E170/175 was mention as some what similar experiences..
What about guys with CRJ 200 experiences flying 121. Does that translate to flying airbus at all? |
Originally Posted by brooklynboys
(Post 2493921)
I know the E170/175 was mention as some what similar experiences..
What about guys with CRJ 200 experiences flying 121. Does that translate to flying airbus at all? |
Originally Posted by Kiwikid
(Post 2493368)
I noticed you went from 1900, 145, then 320 airframes how did you find the transition? I’m a metro driver just trying to get well rounded replies to make an educated decision. Thanks
1900 to CRJ wasn't very difficult at all, much easier than I had expected. CRJ to Airbii was a lot less enjoyable and much worse than I had expected. My 1900 to CRJ training program was top notch. My CRJ to A320 Powerpoint presentation was Spirit. Go to a regional. |
I found the Airbus somewhat difficult to learn only because it was different than anything else I had experienced. However, once I started flying it many things fell into place. IMO it is an easy aircraft to fly.
Probably the best analogy between a conventional aircraft and an Airbus is the difference between a Macintosh and a Windows based computer. They both do the same thing but with different commands and inputs. Also, the Airbus is the great equalizer. It takes great pilots and makes them good and takes bad pilots and makes them good. |
Originally Posted by brooklynboys
(Post 2493921)
I know the E170/175 was mention as some what similar experiences..
What about guys with CRJ 200 experiences flying 121. Does that translate to flying airbus at all? |
I think the current numbers speak for themselves. I think at last count there were over 40 failures this past year. Those are the ones invited to leave. There were more pink slips but those were deemed retrainable and given another ride.
In comparison, other majors only had one or two failures. That being said, the training footprint is very small here, there have been inexperienced pilots as well as experienced not make it. Just depends on the individual. |
Originally Posted by Flyondawall
(Post 2494305)
I think the current numbers speak for themselves. I think at last count there were over 40 failures this past year. Those are the ones invited to leave. There were more pink slips but those were deemed retrainable and given another ride.
In comparison, other majors only had one or two failures. That being said, the training footprint is very small here, there have been inexperienced pilots as well as experienced not make it. Just depends on the individual. Also, what is the company doing about the big failure rate? |
Originally Posted by Vspeeds
(Post 2494491)
Curious, what are folks usually failing, i.e. what aspect of the training phase?
Also, what is the company doing about the big failure rate? The number one thing they could do is sign an industry standard contract thus making Spirit attractive to more experienced pilots that generally can push themselves through our crappy training program. Right now our contract attracts pilots that are not yet equipped with the skills to make it through our terrible program. The training hasn’t changed in years yet failures are up exponentially as hiring has ramped up at carriers with much more lucrative compensation packages. The experience goes elsewhere and we get the bottom of the barrel and hope one doesn’t end up in a mountain one day |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2494502)
All different phases from the oral to IOE. The company isn’t doing anything but overhiring to play the odds.
The number one thing they could do is sign an industry standard contract thus making Spirit attractive to more experienced pilots that generally can push themselves through our crappy training program. Right now our contract attracts pilots that are not yet equipped with the skills to make it through our terrible program. The training hasn’t changed in years yet failures are up exponentially as hiring has ramped up at carriers with much more lucrative compensation packages. The experience goes elsewhere and we get the bottom of the barrel and hope one doesn’t end up in a mountain one day |
Originally Posted by lowandslow
(Post 2494643)
To make matters worse a lot of our really sharp, higher qualified guys/gals leave once they realize we aren’t close to the Big 4 and their number comes up. Good for them but terrible for those of us who hopefully will be convinced to stay.
|
Originally Posted by lowandslow
(Post 2494643)
To make matters worse a lot of our really sharp, higher qualified guys/gals leave once they realize we aren’t close to the Big 4 and their number comes up. Good for them but terrible for those of us who hopefully will be convinced to stay.
|
Originally Posted by Feng
(Post 2494741)
Why is it terrilble and who’s trying to convince you to stay? Last I checked they said juniority is a plus and if you want legacy pay then go to a legacy.
|
Originally Posted by Feng
(Post 2494741)
Why is it terrilble and who’s trying to convince you to stay? Last I checked they said juniority is a plus and if you want legacy pay then go to a legacy.
|
Originally Posted by Feng
(Post 2494741)
Why is it terrilble and who’s trying to convince you to stay? Last I checked they said juniority is a plus and if you want legacy pay then go to a legacy.
Nobody is trying to but I’ve made the choice to wait it out. Terrible was a little dramatic but meaning we are losing good people I’d prefer to spend the rest of my career sharing a seniority list with. |
Originally Posted by FlyingOkra
(Post 2494884)
Jyri, Is that you? :rolleyes:
|
Flying with August new hire, he was great, but told me 70% of his class failed either the oral or the check ride. My class in 2013 there was one pair asking for an extra sim, and no failure. He said a few of these people had been fired from regional initial. We just had a tail-strike on a first ioe flight. This is honestly scaring me because most of them made it to the line, and will eventually upgrade.Very depressing to see...
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2495240)
We just had a tail-strike on a first ioe flight.
|
Originally Posted by Silver02ex
(Post 2495266)
Was this recently?
|
Originally Posted by Silver02ex
(Post 2495266)
Was this recently?
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2495240)
Flying with August new hire, he was great, but told me 70% of his class failed either the oral or the check ride. My class in 2013 there was one pair asking for an extra sim, and no failure. He said a few of these people had been fired from regional initial. We just had a tail-strike on a first ioe flight. This is honestly scaring me because most of them made it to the line, and will eventually upgrade.Very depressing to see...
If yes, then how are they able to pass the Aptitude and Psycho Test but fail during training? |
Originally Posted by Vspeeds
(Post 2495410)
Doesn't Spirit have an online Aptitude/Psychometric Test and after passing it are invited for an interview?
If yes, then how are they able to pass the Aptitude and Psycho Test but fail during training? |
Originally Posted by Vspeeds
(Post 2495410)
Doesn't Spirit have an online Aptitude/Psychometric Test and after passing it are invited for an interview?
If yes, then how are they able to pass the Aptitude and Psycho Test but fail during training? |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2495240)
We just had a tail-strike on a first ioe flight. This is honestly scaring me because most of them made it to the line, and will eventually upgrade.Very depressing to see...
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands