Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
The Signing "Bonus" is the problem >

The Signing "Bonus" is the problem

Search

Notices

The Signing "Bonus" is the problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2018 | 07:03 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Default The Signing "Bonus" is the problem

Serious question:

What would the consensus among our yes voters be if there was no one-time taxed "bonus" for trading away so much... to be locked into a subpar agreement for the next 5-8 years?
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 07:27 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by CMFIC
Serious question:

What would the consensus among our yes voters be if there was no one-time taxed "bonus" for trading away so much... to be locked into a subpar agreement for the next 5-8 years?
I will go out on a limb and say that if you are a FO and voting yes, it is not because of the bonus. That being said, 350+ FOs are on probation and won't be participating by providing a vote
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 07:39 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tjamaica
I will go out on a limb and say that if you are a FO and voting yes, it is not because of the bonus. That being said, 350+ FOs are on probation and won't be participating by providing a vote
I would guess around 1500 to 1600 pilots would be eligible to vote. I agree as an FO the signing bonus is a joke.( I am voting yes)
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 08:10 AM
  #4  
Ed Force One's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 778
Likes: 16
From: A320 CA
Default

Anything less than 100% retro is a joke. It sends a message to the company that it was okay to drag this out for 3 years.

They get to keep our 43% pay raises for themselves. (Minus the bonus, which makes it about, roughly, approximately, plus or minus, 2 years pay we lose.) That's about 6 figures for nearly every pilot who's been here since early openers.)

Oh, and expect nothing to change in 5 years when we do this all again.
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 08:22 AM
  #5  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Question 1: What airline has ever gotten "full retro?"
Question 2: How do you figure they keep our pay raise for themselves?
Guys like you come on here and make these outlandish statements like they are facts. If you want to hate this TA fine, but give a good reason. I cannot imagine how you could back up anything you're saying with logic or anything based on reality, but please indulge us...
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 09:35 AM
  #6  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 111
Likes: 21
From: A320 captain
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Force One
Anything less than 100% retro is a joke. It sends a message to the company that it was okay to drag this out for 3 years.

They get to keep our 43% pay raises for themselves. (Minus the bonus, which makes it about, roughly, approximately, plus or minus, 2 years pay we lose.) That's about 6 figures for nearly every pilot who's been here since early openers.)

Oh, and expect nothing to change in 5 years when we do this all again.
This is the reality of the RLA. Keep beating that 100% retro drum, but it will never make a difference. It’s unjust from our point of view but reality nonetheless.
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 09:39 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tweek
Question 1: What airline has ever gotten "full retro?"
Question 2: How do you figure they keep our pay raise for themselves?
Guys like you come on here and make these outlandish statements like they are facts. If you want to hate this TA fine, but give a good reason. I cannot imagine how you could back up anything you're saying with logic or anything based on reality, but please indulge us...
Delta got full retro last contract, just FYI.
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 09:54 AM
  #8  
Chimpy's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by EyeoftheTiger
Delta got full retro last contract, just FYI.
They did but their % of pay increase was smaller an they didnt negotiate past 12 months of amendable (or somewhere around there)
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 10:04 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
They did but their % of pay increase was smaller an they didnt negotiate past 12 months of amendable (or somewhere around there)
Nor 43% pay raises, added scope, LTD, a retirement plan, etc... We are so far frickin behind!
Reply
Old 02-16-2018 | 11:17 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Total BS
It’s unjust from our point of view but reality nonetheless.
Lots of use of “should” on this forum. Is there a more useless word in the english language?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shfo
Technical
6
08-14-2009 11:34 PM
skybolt
Major
75
05-21-2009 06:57 AM
MaydayMark
Cargo
2
03-11-2009 11:04 AM
vagabond
Technical
4
12-31-2008 04:13 PM
fedupbusdriver
Cargo
13
10-20-2006 05:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices