|
My Bookie is calling it at 56% yes, 40% No, 4% forgot to vote. (+/- 3% error)
Line: 2/1 "NO" the contract doesn't pass 1/6 "YES" the contract passes 500/1 Draw 100% everyone is full of crap |
Originally Posted by Super EZ E
(Post 2531281)
My Bookie is calling it at 56% yes, 40% No, 4% forgot to vote. (+/- 3% error)
Line: 2/1 "NO" the contract doesn't pass 1/6 "YES" the contract passes 500/1 Draw 100% everyone is full of crap |
Im guessing this is how most NO voters considered the contract.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNxz2hhSXuY&t=2m57s |
Originally Posted by Allap
(Post 2530339)
I have yet to fly with a yes voter! All my FOs are a NO
|
Originally Posted by NKSMCOTAKEOVER
(Post 2530340)
52% fail
48% pass If im wrong I will never post on APC again starting March 2 2018. .....with this scren name |
If I were you I would definitely vote NO. For one thing, you first negotiated scope clause should read: ALL flying performed by NK, etc must be flown by pilots on the NK seniority list. You are already allowing a carve out! Why? Have you not been paying attention on whats been going on around you for the last 30+ years? Your pay rates are mediocre, PBS comes way too cheap. Some of you proposed scheduling sounds draconian. You can do MUCH MUCH better. It just takes a modicum of courage. Something that has been rare in this business for decades..Make us proud!
|
Originally Posted by minibus
(Post 2531741)
For one thing, you first negotiated scope clause should read: ALL flying performed by NK, etc must be flown by pilots on the NK seniority list.
|
Originally Posted by minibus
(Post 2531741)
If I were you I would definitely vote NO. For one thing, you first negotiated scope clause should read: ALL flying performed by NK, etc must be flown by pilots on the NK seniority list. You are already allowing a carve out! Why? Have you not been paying attention on whats been going on around you for the last 30+ years? Your pay rates are mediocre, PBS comes way too cheap. Some of you proposed scheduling sounds draconian. You can do MUCH MUCH better. It just takes a modicum of courage. Something that has been rare in this business for decades..Make us proud!
Please elaborate? Draconian? Compared to whose rules? |
Originally Posted by minibus
(Post 2531741)
If I were you I would definitely vote NO. For one thing, you first negotiated scope clause should read: ALL flying performed by NK, etc must be flown by pilots on the NK seniority list. You are already allowing a carve out! Why? Have you not been paying attention on whats been going on around you for the last 30+ years? Your pay rates are mediocre, PBS comes way too cheap. Some of you proposed scheduling sounds draconian. You can do MUCH MUCH better. It just takes a modicum of courage. Something that has been rare in this business for decades..Make us proud!
NK pilots needs to decide for themselves if this TA is what they want. Not get uneducated opinions from some bored outsider. |
Originally Posted by Tool
(Post 2531810)
I’m sorry. Who do you work for? Thanks for your two cents but nobody asked you. We may not be on par with the big 3 this time aroud but every captain on property will be making doctor money starting 3/1. That measures up for me!
NK pilots needs to decide for themselves if this TA is what they want. Not get uneducated opinions from some bored outsider. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:06 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands