Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
Possible Plane Order >

Possible Plane Order

Search

Notices

Possible Plane Order

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2019 | 04:03 PM
  #791  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
Default

Enough to pay for a couple of airbuses.
Reply
Old 10-24-2019 | 05:16 PM
  #792  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by gringo
I for one am disappointed we didn’t get the A220. It would be nice to fly something with similar computing power as my wrist watch...

That being said, I did a little happy dance as soon as I found out we are NOT going to be subjugated to the indignities of flying a lipstick’d up Cold War era flying pig... VNAV or not, at $208/hour I’m not paid nearly enough to work that hard.

A good day indeed.
The Airbus was clearly the best choice for fleet commonality, but I agree the A220 would have been a great addition at the lower end of the seating range. It is such a versatile airplane with a very low CASM.

Any idea on how many A319 NEOs have been ordered?
Reply
Old 10-24-2019 | 05:20 PM
  #793  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
Default

The MOU is written such that NK has the flexibility to adjust its order up or down from A220 to 321LXR. In fact, NK will be taking more leases early on to see how the market will shape the aircraft order to meet the demands of the future.
Reply
Old 10-24-2019 | 05:49 PM
  #794  
TrojanCMH's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
The MOU is written such that NK has the flexibility to adjust its order up or down from A220 to 321LXR. In fact, NK will be taking more leases early on to see how the market will shape the aircraft order to meet the demands of the future.


Where did you hear this?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 10-24-2019 | 05:51 PM
  #795  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 21
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
The MOU is written such that NK has the flexibility to adjust its order up or down from A220 to 321LXR. In fact, NK will be taking more leases early on to see how the market will shape the aircraft order to meet the demands of the future.
That’s not quite what was said. Their intent is to operate an A320 fleet type. While they do have the option to dial it back to a 220, that is not their goal, based on the conference call.
Reply
Old 10-24-2019 | 06:34 PM
  #796  
Omniscient's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
That’s not quite what was said. Their intent is to operate an A320 fleet type. While they do have the option to dial it back to a 220, that is not their goal, based on the conference call.
Exactly correct

Someone asked if they have flexibility to move to other Airbus types. The CFO said yes they do BUT they are interested in the 320 family and operating the 320 family. When asked about the 220, they said the 319 was selected to help serve as the smaller aircraft.

The answer was such a brush off like “sure, yeah....maybe....but won’t happen”

220s aren’t coming and I doubt anything but 320s were ever truly considered
Reply
Old 10-24-2019 | 06:44 PM
  #797  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Default

Congrats for the order...
Honest question: how could a big aircraft order affect potential merger/buyout talks?
Reply
Old 10-24-2019 | 07:19 PM
  #798  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 21
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Originally Posted by cynicalaviator
Congrats for the order...
Honest question: how could a big aircraft order affect potential merger/buyout talks?
If I recall correctly, consolidation was brought up, but for the life of me I can’t remember the gist of the answer.
Reply
Old 10-24-2019 | 07:28 PM
  #799  
Omniscient's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
If I recall correctly, consolidation was brought up, but for the life of me I can’t remember the gist of the answer.
They asked management

“We are not asking about consolidation directly, that's not really the issue. But with the new aircraft contract, did you build any, I don't know, deliberate contract flexibility into that as part of the order? Should you end up participating in M&A at any point during the delivery stream?”

Answer

Hey, Jamie, it's Ed. So we were pretty thoughtful throughout the course of this order for a variety of things. And as Scott mentioned in his comments, flexibility was a component of our fleet desires going forward and that flexibility went up or down within gauge, and we built a balance sheet to enhance that by the way. So we're very excited about the growth prospects. We feel good about the setup. We have the desired fleet flexibility to move within gauge to get more airplanes that we want, to retire aircraft, to sell aircraft. We have flexibility within the contract as well. So I would say, broadly speaking, I think, we're in a good spot.
Reply
Old 10-24-2019 | 10:36 PM
  #800  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
That’s not quite what was said. Their intent is to operate an A320 fleet type. While they do have the option to dial it back to a 220, that is not their goal, based on the conference call.
Yes. I didn’t imply that 220’s are on tap. I said that the MOU provides the flexibility to adjust the order from anything from the 220 to 321 derivatives. And that is exactly correct.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lori Clark
Hangar Talk
24
11-06-2025 07:25 PM
Skybo
United
13
09-04-2012 12:59 PM
ovrtake92
SkyWest
75
07-17-2012 08:40 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
12
05-03-2008 06:06 PM
Squawk8800
Hangar Talk
10
03-06-2008 10:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices