![]() |
Originally Posted by Super EZ E
(Post 2992968)
You guys have seen the email right? Ted claims we will only grow April at 9% so clearly Management isn't that worried.
|
Originally Posted by AllOva736
(Post 2992981)
also says they don’t expect to any adjustments to hiring, staffing or training. Hopefully that stands correct
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 2992576)
They have already cut capacity for April they’ve pretty much already made their choice. I doubt we will be seeing many more classes going forward.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk You know, future spirit pilots read what you say and make decisions based on your ignorant post..... not the best decision but it happens. Start researching and adding educated content, not pond swill. It’s a bad look and makes me think this forum is infected with bitter regional lifers. I just finished recurrent and the union and company folks said the exact opposite, more new hires without any reduction through 2020. Some April reduced hours were coming due to the virus but also the Airbus delivery slow down. Facts, although elusive these days, make for an informed group. I appreciate the previous post using facts to report what is really going on. Common guys/gals.... this is the big leagues. Act like you’ve been there.... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Spirit Pilot Hiring in 2020 & Beyond
Originally Posted by flyjbh
(Post 2992988)
Common guys/gals.... this is the big leagues. Act like you’ve been there....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I have been there, furloughed after 9/11 and downgraded in the recession. That would be great if they keep hiring (more seniority for me) but I’ve heard this song and dance before. Plan for the worst hope for the best. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 2993024)
I have been there, furloughed after 9/11 and downgraded in the recession. That would be great if they keep hiring (more seniority for me) but I’ve heard this song and dance before.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I was there pre 9/11 too. This is different . Hopefully the bow of the ship learned something back then Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by flyjbh
(Post 2993029)
I was there pre 9/11 too. This is different . Hopefully the bow of the ship learned something back then
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by flyjbh
(Post 2992988)
You know, future spirit pilots read what you say and make decisions based on your ignorant post..... not the best decision but it happens. Start researching and adding educated content, not pond swill. It’s a bad look and makes me think this forum is infected with bitter regional lifers. I just finished recurrent and the union and company folks said the exact opposite, more new hires without any reduction through 2020. Some April reduced hours were coming due to the virus but also the Airbus delivery slow down. Facts, although elusive these days, make for an informed group. I appreciate the previous post using facts to report what is really going on. Common guys/gals.... this is the big leagues. Act like you’ve been there....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I wouldn’t advise newhires to change their plans. Take the job if offered. Just be cautious with your math. You might stay longer on reserve but hey, that could always be the case right? |
Roll the Dice, come play Airline Pilot. Welcome to the Airline world. Funny how everything has changed in 10 days. Everything you think you know just went out the window.
|
Like every other news headline, people won’t remember this coronavirus by December. I swear if the news outlets didn’t broadcast/exaggerate it 24/7 for their ratings, we wouldn’t be facing this meltdown.
as far as the 2020 hiring, they planned for 64/month and so far they have hit or exceeded those numbers in every single month. April has 68 new hires scheduled. Subject to change at any time of course, but so far so good. I doubt it will stop but I also wouldn’t be surprised if they cut it in half for a short while. I think as long as this virus doesn’t lead to another recession, we might make it out fine. reserves are gonna be bored for a while though |
Originally Posted by Slowhawk
(Post 2993564)
Like every other news headline, people won’t remember this coronavirus by December. I swear if the news outlets didn’t broadcast/exaggerate it 24/7 for their ratings, we wouldn’t be facing this meltdown.
as far as the 2020 hiring, they planned for 64/month and so far they have hit or exceeded those numbers in every single month. April has 68 new hires scheduled. Subject to change at any time of course, but so far so good. I doubt it will stop but I also wouldn’t be surprised if they cut it in half for a short while. I think as long as this virus doesn’t lead to another recession, we might make it out fine. reserves are gonna be bored for a while though |
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 2993591)
i think spirit would do pretty well in a recession assuming oil stays reasonably priced. People won’t want to spend the extra money to fly a legacy so they’ll fly spirit instead. Companies wanting to save on travel will fly spirit instead of a legacy. It’s why a lot of us came here.
|
Originally Posted by Slowhawk
(Post 2993564)
Like every other news headline, people won’t remember this coronavirus by December. I swear if the news outlets didn’t broadcast/exaggerate it 24/7 for their ratings, we wouldn’t be facing this meltdown.
as far as the 2020 hiring, they planned for 64/month and so far they have hit or exceeded those numbers in every single month. April has 68 new hires scheduled. Subject to change at any time of course, but so far so good. I doubt it will stop but I also wouldn’t be surprised if they cut it in half for a short while. I think as long as this virus doesn’t lead to another recession, we might make it out fine. reserves are gonna be bored for a while though |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2993775)
20+ resignations in January alone. We're going to need to hire 68/month to outpace attrition.
|
Today's SeekingAlpha write up on SAVE was equal parts encouraging and completely frightening. Check it out...
https://seekingalpha.com/article/433...sk-high-reward |
oil hasn't been 105 for over 5 years. have we just not been successful over the past 5 years somehow? seems far fetched.
|
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2993854)
oil hasn't been 105 for over 5 years. have we just not been successful over the past 5 years somehow? seems far fetched.
|
Originally Posted by DrSteveBrule
(Post 2993835)
Today's SeekingAlpha write up on SAVE was equal parts encouraging and completely frightening. Check it out...
https://seekingalpha.com/article/433...sk-high-reward |
My buddy at Frontier says their flights are pretty darn full.
I think the ULCC/LCC model is more immune to this. It is hard to make money when you fly 777/787's to Asia and Europe, and those PAX board via DFW and ORD, fed by 737/A320s. the Big-3 model depends on the business traveler for revenue. Corporate America, Federal Government, and others are cancelling meetings and conferences, and embracing web conferencing/etc. ULCC/LCC are possibly better able to endure this storm. My opinion |
Originally Posted by DrSteveBrule
(Post 2993835)
Today's SeekingAlpha write up on SAVE was equal parts encouraging and completely frightening. Check it out...
https://seekingalpha.com/article/433...sk-high-reward says all airlines will be in the crapper, not just NK. |
Originally Posted by senecacaptain
(Post 2993916)
My buddy at Frontier says their flights are pretty darn full.
I think the ULCC/LCC model is more immune to this. It is hard to make money when you fly 777/787's to Asia and Europe, and those PAX board via DFW and ORD, fed by 737/A320s. the Big-3 model depends on the business traveler for revenue. Corporate America, Federal Government, and others are cancelling meetings and conferences, and embracing web conferencing/etc. ULCC/LCC are possibly better able to endure this storm. My opinion The problem isn’t flight loads now. It’s the demand in the upcoming months that has fallen off a cliff. No airline will be immune. |
Originally Posted by mainlineAF
(Post 2993945)
The problem isn’t flight loads now. It’s the demand in the upcoming months that has fallen off a cliff. No airline will be immune.
|
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 2993954)
Correct. Current flights are already sold and paid for. Upcoming demand, or lack thereof, is what is driving all the actions of the various management groups. NK is betting this passes quickly for the moment, but that’s hardly a given.
|
Fortune favors the bold. Fear is the enemy. Safe spaces are available for the frightened. I don't work for yellow, but, as an ever increasing part owner, I am counting on you.
|
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 2993863)
We’ve not been as successful as we could have been with oil at that price point. Or do you think BS like AA’s foolery with the E island, fare matching and gate limiting at DFW would go on if their fuel prices were 20-30% higher than they’ve been for the last half decade? Give them $100+ per barrel oil and the price differential becomes stark in a ULCC’s favor.
If traffic demands recovers quickly enough, we might be able to take huge advantages of this oil price war. Heck, we might even start hedging, I know I would. Having said all that, there’s always going to be demand for ULCCs (taking covid19 and such extremes apart). In strong economies we stimulate first time flyers “creating” market traffic. In recessions, leisure premium travelers “step down” to fly cheaper. And lastly, don’t forget about independent business travelers that today might represent a very small % but will slowly grow as we add frequencies. |
Cheap oil does benefit everyone. And that’s the point. An environment where everyone can take advantage of the tailwind is not what the ULCC model was built for. That “fit fleet” of young, fuel efficient planes is meant to take advantage of the competition having to pay more for their oil and their older aircraft.
Fuel is the number one expense for any airline. The legacies can play their games to suppress the ULCC niche and it’s growth when that cost is low. Those opportunities are much more limited when oil is selling for a more traditional price point. This isn’t rocket science. The cost structure and higher personnel and support costs of the legacies make competition with a ULCC nearly untenable when oil costs more. |
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 2994116)
Cheap oil does benefit everyone. And that’s the point. An environment where everyone can take advantage of the tailwind is not what the ULCC model was built for. That “fit fleet” of young, fuel efficient planes is meant to take advantage of the competition having to pay more for their oil and their older aircraft.
Fuel is the number one expense for any airline. The legacies can play their games to suppress the ULCC niche and it’s growth when that cost is low. Those opportunities are much more limited when oil is selling for a more traditional price point. This isn’t rocket science. The cost structure and higher personnel and support costs of the legacies make competition with a ULCC nearly untenable when oil costs more. |
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 2994172)
our fleet really isn’t that fuel efficient compared to any legacy right now. A CEO 320 built in 2016 burns the same as a CEO 320 built in 1995. We only have like what 25-30 NEO’s right now.
Also, we’re not hauling cargo for a third party, and our seat density is higher. That means we’re not flying them as heavy and we’re moving more butts per unit of fuel burn than say AA. Additionally, we’re accomplishing the same mission with smaller planes. A legacy would need a 767 or larger to move the same number of people as we do on a 321. Or a 757 to the same number as one of our 320s. Those fuel burns aren’t even close. And, as you’ve correctly noted, that gap widens as we essentially go all NEO from this point forward. Low fuel costs are a boon for us now as load factors will drop off with the current market scare. But we fare better in a more traditional demand environment with a normalized oil price. |
Investors don’t share the same sentiment. We are down almost 21% pre-market
|
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 2995164)
Investors don’t share the same sentiment. We are down almost 21% pre-market
|
It’s really irrelevant what our stock price is at this point... until the hysteria calms down, all the stocks are misrepresented
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by flyjbh
(Post 2995182)
It’s really irrelevant what our stock price is at this point... until the hysteria calms down, all the stocks are misrepresented
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 2995164)
Investors don’t share the same sentiment. We are down almost 21% pre-market
|
Originally Posted by flyjbh
(Post 2995182)
It’s really irrelevant what our stock price is at this point... until the hysteria calms down, all the stocks are misrepresented
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by DrSteveBrule
(Post 2995288)
Tell that to the investors that fund our growth
Our growth is already funded. The investors were there when we needed to secure financing . That deal is done.... we just need to pay for it now Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 2995225)
watching the stock market on the day to day roller coaster of a panic driven pandemic is probably an inaccurate way to gauge things.
I can’t imagine the domestic fleet not being grounded for all airlines as this starts to grow more and pop up more on planes. The concern shouldn’t be stock price, it should be what is our burn rate on cash with a fleet not flying, would the government subsidize all airlines if there is a grounding (would assume so) and is Airbus in schedule to deliver planes and will we/can we postpone for a quarter or so. |
Originally Posted by Omniscient
(Post 2995392)
It’s as ridiculous as a 35 year old looking at their 401k balance right now saying they “lost money”. Rational thought rarely exists in the market and it left the building about 2 weeks ago.
I can’t imagine the domestic fleet not being grounded for all airlines as this starts to grow more and pop up more on planes. The concern shouldn’t be stock price, it should be what is our burn rate on cash with a fleet not flying, would the government subsidize all airlines if there is a grounding (would assume so) and is Airbus in schedule to deliver planes and will we/can we postpone for a quarter or so. |
Originally Posted by Omniscient
(Post 2995392)
It’s as ridiculous as a 35 year old looking at their 401k balance right now saying they “lost money”. Rational thought rarely exists in the market and it left the building about 2 weeks ago.
I can’t imagine the domestic fleet not being grounded for all airlines as this starts to grow more and pop up more on planes. The concern shouldn’t be stock price, it should be what is our burn rate on cash with a fleet not flying, would the government subsidize all airlines if there is a grounding (would assume so) and is Airbus in schedule to deliver planes and will we/can we postpone for a quarter or so. |
Originally Posted by flyjbh
(Post 2995382)
Our growth is already funded. The investors were there when we needed to secure financing . That deal is done.... we just need to pay for it now
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 2995396)
if the govt mandates all grounding of US Airlines how could they not be willing to subsidize the losses...
|
Originally Posted by senecacaptain
(Post 2995400)
I think we have enough fear mongering via soccer mom facebook groups and on Good Morning America.
Why some continue to dismiss the medical experts on this and act like all is normal, it’s ridiculous. Nobody is saying they hide in a bunker but if you’re not at least considering possible alternatives like a brief halt to air travel, you aren’t paying attention to the rest of the world and how this country is trending. This way of thinking isn’t necessarily out of fear, it’s out of being realistic and looking at all angles. Maybe if our own government hadn’t said just 2 weeks ago that “we are at 15 cases and soon be at 0,” and took meaningful preventive action then, we wouldn’t be where we are now. |
Originally Posted by Omniscient
(Post 2995433)
This isn’t fear mongering, it’s not just closing your eyes and saying “it’s just a flu and will go away In the summer”
Why some continue to dismiss the medical experts on this and act like all is normal, it’s ridiculous. Nobody is saying they hide in a bunker but if you’re not at least considering possible alternatives like a brief halt to air travel, you aren’t paying attention to the rest of the world and how this country is trending. This way of thinking isn’t necessarily out of fear, it’s out of being realistic and looking at all angles. Maybe if our own government hadn’t said just 2 weeks ago that “we are at 15 cases and soon be at 0,” and took meaningful preventive action then, we wouldn’t be where we are now. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:42 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands