Side gigs....
#21
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
https://fixingnotams.org/the-problem...-about-notams/
How about we just fix the real problem with NOTAMS? Having a to read through a ton of irrelevant stuff in NOTAMS decreases safety.
How about we just fix the real problem with NOTAMS? Having a to read through a ton of irrelevant stuff in NOTAMS decreases safety.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 44
NOTAMS? Yes on occasion there is an important NOTAM but 99% of the NOTAMS have zero impact on your flight. Your job is to look at the NOTAMS and find that one NOTAM that is important to your flight. But no, there are some guys that treat every single last NOTAM like it's the be all end all, that taxiway closure in some obscure corner of the airport you never go to, that 200' crane 2 miles off the end of the runway, etc. I don't care about that obscure stuff and never will. But there is always that guy who obsesses about it. And yeah, they are working too hard. You wanna be that guy? I'll make fun of you for it. I've got tens of thousands of hours of flight time with this philosophy and I've never had an issue.
#23
Another weak argument there bud
#24
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
#25
No no, your logic is sound and arguments valid. I look forward to more tips and tricks for the suckers working too hard. Fuel hacks are probably a waste of time too, I mean how often are we leaking or short on gas right?
#26
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
But have you seen some of these darling captains we have? I shouldnt have to be embarrassed walking around a terminal with Captain wearing clip on sunglasses indoors, a red suitcase, ripped pants, yellow shirt, and smells like he hasnt showered in a week.
Calling all FOs unprofessional is quite a broad stroke and completely false for 99% of us. I get it, some guys leave alot to be desired, however mentoring new guys is part of the job. Not everyone is straight out of the airforce academy. Calling half our seniority list abysmal, is ****ing ridiculous. Flying 1.5 pilot? Really? Sometimes I feel the same way about some of our Captains. VERY few of them, but not ALL of them. You dont see me calling everyone abysmal.
#27
Apparently your airline doesn't require that you be stabilized at 1000, right? Because at mine even if you're circling we still need to meet that criteria. If you circle at 200 ft, then yeah I guess that tower would be relevant but I don't circle at 200 ft. But alas, I know I'm not convincing anyone. Just further proving my point that some guys make this job harder than it needs to be, by worrying about stuff that has no effect on the flight (like that 200' tower somewhere in the rough vicinity of the airport). Can't wait to get my next "Pretty weak argument there bud!" 

#28
I agree with you. Some guys make this job harder than it has to be. I’ve had a few conversations with my FOs about some of them. The only time I read notams is going into an unfamiliar airport, one without a tower, or during hard IMC when I have to do an actual approach. I don’t bother marking taxiways because I figure if it has a tower, they aren’t going to send me down a closed taxiway. If the FAA redid notams and made it easier to find pertinent information, I think more pilots would look at them. Anyways to each their own as long as you’re being safe.
If this was meant to be sarcastic, it was presented well
If this is your true outlook and thought process, you're actions are nothing short of careless.
"I don’t bother marking taxiways because I figure if it has a tower, they aren’t going to send me down a closed taxiway"
---please tell me this was all a joke
#29
Wow...I hope this entire post was sarcasm, because if not, we just hired a doozy....
If this was meant to be sarcastic, it was presented well
If this is your true outlook and thought process, you're actions are nothing short of careless.
"I don’t bother marking taxiways because I figure if it has a tower, they aren’t going to send me down a closed taxiway"
---please tell me this was all a joke
If this was meant to be sarcastic, it was presented well
If this is your true outlook and thought process, you're actions are nothing short of careless.
"I don’t bother marking taxiways because I figure if it has a tower, they aren’t going to send me down a closed taxiway"
---please tell me this was all a joke
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 44
I agree with you. Some guys make this job harder than it has to be. I’ve had a few conversations with my FOs about some of them. The only time I read notams is going into an unfamiliar airport, one without a tower, or during hard IMC when I have to do an actual approach. I don’t bother marking taxiways because I figure if it has a tower, they aren’t going to send me down a closed taxiway. If the FAA redid notams and made it easier to find pertinent information, I think more pilots would look at them. Anyways to each their own as long as you’re being safe.
If you are coming into land and it’s snowing and you turn off the runway before tower gives you instructions and you turn off into a closed taxiway (just because a taxiway is closed doesn’t mean it will barricaded) you just made a violation. I have heard of people being violated for this. Just one example.
Your probably the kinda of person I hear on the radio ask for the ILS to a runway at the last minute and the control says “it’s NOTAMED out of service” then there’s an awkward silence.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



