Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
Lineholders get pay protected AGAIN! >

Lineholders get pay protected AGAIN!

Search

Notices

Lineholders get pay protected AGAIN!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2020 | 01:26 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5
I’m not at Spirit, but I think most take the VIL lines where I work because their normal easy one leg commute has now turned into a 2 or 3 leg commute and needing a hotel on each side of the trip. So losing 20-25 hours of credit is worth it to them, even if most of their flying would be canceled anyway.

people are ****ed because line holders made out better. Nothing changed from the VILs perspective. They bid for and got exactly what they wanted. Life sucks, it isn’t fair.

I’m on RSV, so in reality I should be more ****ed off than anybody. RSV gets fisted once again.....
Reply
Old 04-24-2020 | 01:43 PM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
Run me through that math. 1000 VIL lines is roughly $3M and change in savings. I come up with 300 first year FO’s needing about $1.25M plus the cost of benefits.
1000 vil lines equals 22,000 hrs of pay reduced for that month. Take that and divide it by 72hrs guarantee. Equals like 305.5. Then account for they don’t furlough 1/2 captains 1/2 fo’s. If the trend continues for 1000 vil a month, if you’re the bottom 300 on the list I’d say you’re in danger come October.
Reply
Old 04-24-2020 | 01:52 PM
  #33  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
Run me through that math. 1000 VIL lines is roughly $3M and change in savings. I come up with 300 first year FO’s needing about $1.25M plus the cost of benefits.
22,000 hrs of pay saved

22,000 / 72hr guarantee = 305 pilots

more or less when you factor in longevities or those furloughed or downgraded vs those taking the VIL and also variable is paying benefits on VIL vs furlough and not.

its rough math but about a savings of 305 pilots a month on guarantee with 1000 VIL.

Now they take that money and toss it at the lineholders to pick up and those that don’t get the month off with pay. That very well may still be a net savings for the company than flying an unprofitable schedule but erased goodwill for folks to want to take VILs in the future. And what RSV is still responsible for being in position for their RAPs? How about wipe all the RAPs with pay and put the ones you need in open time for pick up over guarantee.
Reply
Old 04-24-2020 | 01:53 PM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by MATEN308
1000 vil lines equals 22,000 hrs of pay reduced for that month. Take that and divide it by 72hrs guarantee. Equals like 305.5. Then account for they don’t furlough 1/2 captains 1/2 fo’s. If the trend continues for 1000 vil a month, if you’re the bottom 300 on the list I’d say you’re in danger come October.
1000 VIL’s by my back of the napkin math pays the entire company payroll for roughly a day. And I’m not sure they’re going to put the savings into individual buckets by employee group.

300 first year FO’s x 58 dollars an hour (generous with the 321 override) x 72 hours per month = $1.253M. Maybe $2M with all benefits included.

I dont have a problem with looking at it in terms of furloughs prevented per month. But it needs to presented to us that way with some numbers beside them we can grab ahold of mentally.

My greater point was that saving 1 day of entire company payroll is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
Reply
Old 04-24-2020 | 01:55 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Default

And the band played on.

Plane Coffee
Reply
Old 04-24-2020 | 02:13 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
1000 VIL’s by my back of the napkin math pays the entire company payroll for roughly a day. And I’m not sure they’re going to put the savings into individual buckets by employee group.

300 first year FO’s x 58 dollars an hour (generous with the 321 override) x 72 hours per month = $1.253M. Maybe $2M with all benefits included.

I dont have a problem with looking at it in terms of furloughs prevented per month. But it needs to presented to us that way with some numbers beside them we can grab ahold of mentally.

My greater point was that saving 1 day of entire company payroll is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
Exactly. Correct me if I’m wrong, but there have been zero promises, documents, or even whispers from the company OR union that the VILs will “save jobs” “prevent furlough” etc. They were sold as a way to get a little pay for a whole month off. Nothing more.
Reply
Old 04-24-2020 | 02:29 PM
  #37  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

Actually they did say it would help mitigate involuntary furloughs. I even have a union email that says it, plain as day
Reply
Old 04-24-2020 | 02:38 PM
  #38  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
1000 VIL’s by my back of the napkin math pays the entire company payroll for roughly a day. And I’m not sure they’re going to put the savings into individual buckets by employee group.

300 first year FO’s x 58 dollars an hour (generous with the 321 override) x 72 hours per month = $1.253M. Maybe $2M with all benefits included.

I dont have a problem with looking at it in terms of furloughs prevented per month. But it needs to presented to us that way with some numbers beside them we can grab ahold of mentally.

My greater point was that saving 1 day of entire company payroll is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
Try to look at a furlough as block hours of flying reduction not just $$$’s. The 300 number is a guess that they may be looking at 20,000 hour reduction of the flying schedule. The company will be right sized per the cba of 72hrs pay per pilot. Right now we went from 700+ departures a day to 56 I think. Certainly don’t need a lot of guys to cover that. The number they came up with might be a projection of where they think they’re gonna be down the road here. The whole thing sucks. When it comes down to the wire it will be how many hours are we flying and how fat do they want to keep the group to cover that flying. So basically block hours/72 + the fat for reserves/medical/ voluntary leave etc... wish they would give us a number but all we have right now is they wanted to shed 22,000 hrs of block/pay off the top. Hence 300 pilots.
Reply
Old 04-24-2020 | 02:40 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jimdunbar
Actually they did say it would help mitigate involuntary furloughs. I even have a union email that says it, plain as day
You’re right, it said something like “...The most common method of furlough mitigation in the industry is voluntary leave”. Then it didn’t mention if the company agreed that they’d prevent furloughs because of it. Second to last paragraph mentions they’re “hopeful” it will avoid involuntary furlough, but that word isn’t making me feel to warm and fuzzy.
Reply
Old 04-24-2020 | 03:01 PM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 663
Likes: 46
Default

IMO, the fact that they relieved all line holders with pay and are adding all flying into open time is mind blowing. It not only allows people to have high credit for the month when we are hemorrhaging money but it also puts all of the responsibility of moving airplanes on RSV pilots if it’s not picked up. WTF are these people doing?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clearedtopush
Delta
241
07-27-2016 06:10 PM
MikeF16
Delta
179
02-03-2016 08:22 PM
CloudSailor
FedEx
96
10-17-2015 07:20 AM
Albief15
FedEx
161
10-02-2015 03:11 PM
nerd2009
Major
73
09-26-2010 01:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices