Lineholders get pay protected AGAIN!
04-25-2020 | 01:56 PM
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
04-25-2020 | 02:25 PM
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
04-25-2020 | 06:56 PM
#84
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
https://ops.group/blog/wp-content/up...ace-months.pdf
04-25-2020 | 07:04 PM
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
I brought this up in a next thread, didn’t the FAA exempt the 90 day landing currency 121.439(a) in the list of exemption due to the covid19. Link to exemption:
https://ops.group/blog/wp-content/up...ace-months.pdf
https://ops.group/blog/wp-content/up...ace-months.pdf
04-25-2020 | 08:36 PM
#86
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
“Because A4A is a trade association and not a certificate holder, it cannot be granted an exemption from FAA operating requirements. Accordingly, the FAA will grant the relief requested by A4A to its members and all part 119 certificate holders conducting training and qualification under part 121 when requested. To make this exemption effective, each affected certificate holder must submit to the FAA a request in the form of a Letter of Intent to use this exemption and affirm its intentions to comply with the conditions and limitations of this exemption.”
So I guess Spirit just has to request the exemption.
04-27-2020 | 06:30 AM
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Per the releasing line holders without placing them on TAJ, that action was specifically requested of the company by our MEC Chairman according to email correspondence with my rep. So we, the union, are behind the line holders not being reassigned through TAJ to operate the new pairings.
04-27-2020 | 09:59 AM
#88
Line holder
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,179
Likes: 258
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Per the releasing line holders without placing them on TAJ, that action was specifically requested of the company by our MEC Chairman according to email correspondence with my rep. So we, the union, are behind the line holders not being reassigned through TAJ to operate the new pairings.
04-27-2020 | 10:07 AM
#89
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 944
Likes: 258
From: A320
AFAIK, SWA with the same reschedule, decided to reassign trips in reverse seniority on "TAJ" days. I think it was financially irresponsible of the union to request above guarantee/line value pay for trips that could have been contractually signed out without extra pay.
I agree, but the union can ask all it wants, it’s up to the company to play along. Both are equally to blame IMO.
04-27-2020 | 10:41 AM
#90
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 508
Likes: 5
AFAIK, SWA with the same reschedule, decided to reassign trips in reverse seniority on "TAJ" days. I think it was financially irresponsible of the union to request above guarantee/line value pay for trips that could have been contractually signed out without extra pay.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
