![]() |
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3549431)
I’m fine with always being on ghetto end of every terminal. With all that in mind, there is an updated market cost for what it costs to crew a narrowbody N-registered jet, and no one here can sell me on the idea that any QOL should make me feel comfortable accepting less than that market rate.
|
The override pay is a joke. It’s definitely not a guarantee. I like how the union and company are advising it’s an additional 2 percent raise. Thats definitely not the case. It’s done off of block hours and if anyone even looks at the percentage of hours we are getting for the last few years it has never reach 2 percent. I just look at mine for this up coming pay period and we are actually getting 1.58%. So when you do the math it’s not $306 an hour as advertised it’s actually $304 an hour. I know we are supposed to get more 321 this next year but those will be a wash with all the extra 320 we are also getting. Our union does a great job with smoke and mirrors on every TA they have ever brought to the pilot group.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Bgood
(Post 3549469)
Then let Spirit come up to legacy rates too. After all, the legacies haven't had a pay raise in 4 years.
And you can damn well bet B6 stood up in cold ass NY on the streets and demanded it for most of that journey to legacy rates. You get what you want when you demand it, not settle for what the company is willing to offer. Go to sleep. Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk Bragging about matching 4 year old pay rates isn't saying much for B6 |
Originally Posted by HardPassSpa
(Post 3549489)
The override pay is a joke. It’s definitely not a guarantee. I like how the union and company are advising it’s an additional 2 percent raise. Thats definitely not the case. It’s done off of block hours and if anyone even looks at the percentage of hours we are getting for the last few years it has never reach 2 percent. I just look at mine for this up coming pay period and we are actually getting 1.58%. So when you do the math it’s not $306 an hour as advertised it’s actually $304 an hour. I know we are supposed to get more 321 this next year but those will be a wash with all the extra 320 we are also getting. Our union does a great job with smoke and mirrors on every TA they have ever brought to the pilot group.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I’m glad someone else noticed our override hasn’t hit 2 percent in years. |
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3549610)
You exceeded current legacy pay rates with your AIP.
Bragging about matching 4 year old pay rates isn't saying much for B6 I guarantee B6 is gonna be similar to the new legacy TA’s when they come out, which will be much better than ours. |
JetBlues focused TA is going to blow us out of the water and we are going to look like chumps
|
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3549957)
JetBlues focused TA is going to blow us out of the water and we are going to look like chumps
|
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 3549979)
snap up would have been nice…..
|
I think the negotiating committee intends to include an increase to jetBlue rates as part of the transition process agreement (just reading the tea leaves, most likely wrong).
Does anyone know if there is precedent in prior mergers for that to happen? Hopefully they will be more clear on what they intend to fight for in a TPA. |
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3549982)
It’s not too late
|
Originally Posted by GWY320
(Post 3549994)
I think the negotiating committee intends to include an increase to jetBlue rates as part of the transition process agreement (just reading the tea leaves, most likely wrong).
Does anyone know if there is precedent in prior mergers for that to happen? Hopefully they will be more clear on what they intend to fight for in a TPA. |
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 3550003)
I believe that is what happened with AK/VA, VA snapped up to AK, and this is the goal for the TPA.
Whatever we get now we'll be stuck with until the JCBA, which is years down the line. |
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 3550052)
I doubt it, not with this NC.
Whatever we get now we'll be stuck with until the JCBA, which is years down the line. |
Originally Posted by baseball3792
(Post 3550073)
There’s no way you can possibly know that, just like there’s no way you can be sure that management will rush to return to the table if this agreement is voted down. Management might immediately return to the table. They also might agree to raise pay to B6 in a TPA. There is no way to know for sure, and stating anything for certain is fearmongering
|
Originally Posted by baseball3792
(Post 3550073)
There’s no way you can possibly know that, just like there’s no way you can be sure that management will rush to return to the table if this agreement is voted down. Management might immediately return to the table. They also might agree to raise pay to B6 in a TPA. There is no way to know for sure, and stating anything for certain is fearmongering
"We'll get 'em next time" |
Originally Posted by GWY320
(Post 3549994)
I think the negotiating committee intends to include an increase to jetBlue rates as part of the transition process agreement (just reading the tea leaves, most likely wrong).
Does anyone know if there is precedent in prior mergers for that to happen? Hopefully they will be more clear on what they intend to fight for in a TPA. |
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3549610)
You exceeded current legacy pay rates with your AIP.
Bragging about matching 4 year old pay rates isn't saying much for B6 And no, it's not my intention to be bragging about anything. My intention is for all of us to be paid fairly, regardless of the business model. Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Bgood
(Post 3549469)
Then let Spirit come up to legacy rates too. After all, the legacies haven't had a pay raise in 4 years.
And you can damn well bet B6 stood up in cold ass NY on the streets and demanded it for most of that journey to legacy rates. You get what you want when you demand it, not settle for what the company is willing to offer. Go to sleep. Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk Stand down.... talking to these people is like talking to the wall. |
Originally Posted by 8JRMfortheyear
(Post 3550203)
Stand down.... talking to these people is like talking to the wall.
I personally can't give away the leverage we have today for these rates and the lack of a snap up. I will vote -no- but I think this will pass. If this acquisition falls through we will pay a big price, if it doesn't we look weak. People will vote what's best for them, such is life. Sorry. |
Originally Posted by putzin
(Post 3551505)
Not all of us.
I personally can't give away the leverage we have today for these rates and the lack of a snap up. I will vote -no- but I think this will pass. If this acquisition falls through we will pay a big price, if it doesn't we look weak. People will vote what's best for them, such is life. Sorry. so in other-words, if the TA passes and the JetBlue merger fails. We go back straight to negotiations and we have just as much leverage. (Because using your logic this is a crappy TA and people will still be leaving anyways) we are in a win-win situation if we say yes to this TA! |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3551565)
I think it’s funny that in the same thought you think this is a crap TA, but if this TA passes using your same logic we should still have plenty of leverage because people would still be leaving.
so in other-words, if the TA passes and the JetBlue merger fails. We go back straight to negotiations and we have just as much leverage. (Because using your logic this is a crappy TA and people will still be leaving anyways) we are in a win-win situation if we say yes to this TA! |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3550180)
I think for now the company will wait and see because they think this TA is good enough to get people to stay.
|
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 3551600)
Probably good enough to pass, but not good enough for people to stay.
Attrition will go down. |
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 3551600)
Probably good enough to pass, but not good enough for people to stay.
…and that is why we STILL have leverage!!! Well said. a win-win if this TA passes! |
Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
(Post 3551602)
Good enough for enough people to stay. This passes, leverage gone.
Attrition will go down. swing and a miss… |
Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
(Post 3551602)
Good enough for enough people to stay. This passes, leverage gone.
Attrition will go down. |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3551565)
I think it’s funny that in the same thought you think this is a crap TA, but if this TA passes using your same logic we should still have plenty of leverage because people would still be leaving.
so in other-words, if the TA passes and the JetBlue merger fails. We go back straight to negotiations and we have just as much leverage. (Because using your logic this is a crappy TA and people will still be leaving anyways) we are in a win-win situation if we say yes to this TA! |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3551618)
This passes it will make zero short term difference. Must be 100-120 guys with CJOs elsewhere awaiting their class dates right now. And at least as many more burnishing their resumes and prepping for interviews. I think without really major changes in benefits and compensation, NK may wind up like AK. The lifers are those with too much invested in their seniority to leave or locals who are putting up with less than the legacies because of their bases.
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3551618)
This passes it will make zero short term difference. Must be 100-120 guys with CJOs elsewhere awaiting their class dates right now. And at least as many more burnishing their resumes and prepping for interviews. I think without really major changes in benefits and compensation, NK may wind up like AK. The lifers are those with too much invested in their seniority to leave or locals who are putting up with less than the legacies because of their bases.
EDIT: I think Spirit knows maybe it’s not enough, but it buys them time. If this passes, they can manage long enough till the JCBA. |
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 3551661)
yeah but unlike AK we get the opportunity to negotiate with our JB brothers & sister for a JCBA
|
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 3551802)
You're assuming the B6/NK merger is approved. If it isn't, then we're stuck with this half-baked TA for years waiting for Franke and Co. to really hose us.
|
This will for sure put a very big dent in attrition.
Being able to move first year pay at their will will be cemented in there and we and the JetBlue pilots will have to pay to get it out and the price will be high. It may be 10+ years before we have todays conditions again but that language will come back to haunt us in the future. |
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3551825)
This will for sure put a very big dent in attrition.
Being able to move first year pay at their will will be cemented in there and we and the JetBlue pilots will have to pay to get it out and the price will be high. It may be 10+ years before we have todays conditions again but that language will come back to haunt us in the future. And their 12 year 320 CAs make $283 +16% DC - and that’s their CURRENT contract. Again, without screwing over there newbies. |
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3551825)
This will for sure put a very big dent in attrition.
Being able to move first year pay at their will will be cemented in there and we and the JetBlue pilots will have to pay to get it out and the price will be high. It may be 10+ years before we have todays conditions again but that language will come back to haunt us in the future. |
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3551821)
100 percent
… and the fear mongering continues… |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3551867)
… and the fear mongering continues…
“Raise first year pay? Leverage gone!” - meanwhile Frontiers new hire attrition unchanged “You can be sure DFW will be CLOSED if we merge!” -Frontier opens DFW base “You can be sure Franke and Frontiers negotiation will drag out for YEARS!” -Spirit and Frontier said they hoped to have the merger complete by the end of 2022. TA sent out only after 3 months…. |
Some of yall need to call my good buddy JG Wentworth really bad.
|
Originally Posted by Tx Paratroopr
(Post 3551882)
Some of yall need to call my good buddy JG Wentworth really bad.
|
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 3551880)
It’s pretty humorous. Regarding the rumors with Frontier…
“Raise first year pay? Leverage gone!” - meanwhile Frontiers new hire attrition unchanged “You can be sure DFW will be CLOSED if we merge!” -Frontier opens DFW base “You can be sure Franke and Frontiers negotiation will drag out for YEARS!” -Spirit and Frontier said they hoped to have the merger complete by the end of 2022. TA sent out only after 3 months…. |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 3551802)
You're assuming the B6/NK merger is approved. If it isn't, then we're stuck with this half-baked TA for years waiting for Franke and Co. to really hose us.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:11 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands