![]() |
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3547474)
Because it can't sustain if your costs are the same. Simple. One main reason it works now because overall labor costs are low. If pilots get top pay, don't you think other work groups will want it and deserve it?? There goes business model.
|
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3547459)
Honest question. If a company pays employees the same as others, fuel costs what it does, and aircraft cost what they do, what's makes an lcc work? You can't charge $49 for tickets when your operating costs are the same as everybody. Business model doesn't work. You can only count on so many people not realizing they have to pay for bags.
|
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3547598)
It’s already been mentioned but you don’t get it. It’s about utilization. Airplanes not flying at peak utilization is why we aren’t profitable and why the company is even at the table. Paying us delta pay wouldn’t make or break profitability. There are cost advantages elsewhere and utilization is a big part of that.
|
Originally Posted by SpeedBrakes
(Post 3547411)
New details leaked by LEC person (heard second had in ORD)
1st year $90 2nd year $145 6th year CA $270 12 year CA $305 Company pushing Red Eyes, offering extra $15/hr for those who do them. Guess they want to start doing more red eyes from what i've heard. Looks like a NO from me.......but need to see complete agreement before making decision. |
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 3547608)
Better be a joke!!
Has to be a joke. Mesa airlines pays new hires $100. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3547598)
It’s already been mentioned but you don’t get it. It’s about utilization. Airplanes not flying at peak utilization is why we aren’t profitable and why the company is even at the table. Paying us delta pay wouldn’t make or break profitability. There are cost advantages elsewhere and utilization is a big part of that.
|
Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
(Post 3547597)
goodness, you used a bunch of words to show everybody that you have no idea what the hell you are even talking about.
|
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3547614)
You don't get it. Pilots pay goes to top, guess what FAs want top pay, rampers, mechanics, etc. Overall labor bill is HUGE for any airline. I'm not not just talking about pilot pay. Total labor. Your business models thrives on lower costs which pretty much equals lower wages all around.
|
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 3547608)
Better be a joke!!
|
We haven’t even the seen an ounce of details and the infighting is priceless ! The Next month is gonna be fun to watch the bickering on here! Popcorn ready.
|
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3547614)
You don't get it. Pilots pay goes to top, guess what FAs want top pay, rampers, mechanics, etc. Overall labor bill is HUGE for any airline. I'm not not just talking about pilot pay. Total labor. Your business models thrives on lower costs which pretty much equals lower wages all around.
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3547629)
We haven’t even the seen an ounce of details and the infighting is priceless ! The Next month is gonna be fun to watch the bickering on here! Popcorn ready.
|
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3547614)
You don't get it. Pilots pay goes to top, guess what FAs want top pay, rampers, mechanics, etc. Overall labor bill is HUGE for any airline. I'm not not just talking about pilot pay. Total labor. Your business models thrives on lower costs which pretty much equals lower wages all around.
|
My guess is MEC thinks it comes up short. Sends it back to NC to go back to the table. We get no details today.
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3547648)
My guess is MEC thinks it comes up short. Sends it back to NC to go back to the table. We get no details today.
|
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 3547608)
Better be a joke!!
|
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3547616)
Come back to me in a few years when you have 100s of millions in merger expenses, labor through the roof and tell me how your profit sharing check is doing. You show you know nothing.
|
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3547474)
Because it can't sustain if your costs are the same. Simple. One main reason it works now because overall labor costs are low. If pilots get top pay, don't you think other work groups will want it and deserve it?? There goes business model.
No real dog in this fight. But, have you ever heard of Frank Lorenzo? Did I just age myself? For you youngsters, Frank Lorenzo was a very important man! Adored by some, loathed by most. With today’s pilot market his tactics would equal to “****ing into wind.” Don’t take my word for it. A little research will show that some Regional pilots are making something like $300k or even more! Do we think that their management found religion all of a sudden? Did they become lovers of labor all of a sudden? Or, could it be that they just can’t staff their pilot ranks? My theory is that for those that don’t wanna pay and play, they will eventually suffer the consequences via recruiting shortfalls and attrition. |
Originally Posted by Avro85
(Post 3547650)
If this happens, no need sending the same negotiation group back.
|
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3547670)
This is premature. There is a well defined process for how this all works, and if the AIP is determined to not meet expectations then the NC will be sent back with updated parameters to negotiate to. Let’s not campaign to throw anyone under the bus with no information about what was on the table.
Agreed. The negotiation committee has boundaries set by the voting members of the MEC. They have zero authority to go lower on their own. |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3547629)
We haven’t even the seen an ounce of details and the infighting is priceless ! The Next month is gonna be fun to watch the bickering on here! Popcorn ready.
Hopefully cooler heads will prevail amongst those of us who actually work here and are eligible to vote. |
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3547614)
You don't get it. Pilots pay goes to top, guess what FAs want top pay, rampers, mechanics, etc. Overall labor bill is HUGE for any airline. I'm not not just talking about pilot pay. Total labor. Your business models thrives on lower costs which pretty much equals lower wages all around.
|
If the numbers are true that I just heard from a pretty reliable source, Spirit’s costs will rise, and the same amount of pilots will be walking out the door.
|
What time are we supposed to hear the news today?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by LongHornFlyer
(Post 3547710)
If the numbers are true that I just heard from a pretty reliable source, Spirit’s costs will rise, and the same amount of pilots will be walking out the door.
|
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3547670)
This is premature. There is a well defined process for how this all works, and if the AIP is determined to not meet expectations then the NC will be sent back with updated parameters to negotiate to. Let’s not campaign to throw anyone under the bus with no information about what was on the table.
|
Voted for Memrat, 27%..
bickering beginning in 3…….2……..1…… |
Originally Posted by Avro85
(Post 3547720)
I am intimately aware of how this process works from inside the ring and stand by my thought. If the NC brings an agreement to the MEC that doesn't pass their approval, then the NC either didn't know what the parameters were to start with or the MEC moved the goal line and didn't tell them.
|
AIP passed MEC, standby for TA sent to pilots
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3547723)
Voted for Memrat, 27%..
bickering beginning in 3…….2……..1…… |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3547723)
Voted for Memrat, 27%..
bickering beginning in 3…….2……..1…… |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3547723)
Voted for Memrat, 27%..
bickering beginning in 3…….2……..1…… |
Originally Posted by SpeedBrakes
(Post 3547741)
What about a snap up clause? I’m done being the bottom feeder
|
Originally Posted by SpeedBrakes
(Post 3547741)
What about a snap up clause? I’m done being the bottom feeder
|
Originally Posted by baseball3792
(Post 3547747)
Go to delta
|
Originally Posted by baseball3792
(Post 3547747)
Go to delta
|
Originally Posted by SpeedBrakes
(Post 3547763)
No Thanks, not a fan of double breast
|
Originally Posted by SpeedBrakes
(Post 3547763)
No Thanks, not a fan of double breast
|
No concessions but now company is able to get 1st year pay raises without union approval nice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3547782)
Theres always an excuse. My guess is already got turned down.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:11 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands