![]() |
“Arguably, it is possible that management could decide to return to the bargaining table quickly and offer more money. But throughout negotiations we need to deal with probabilities rather than possibilities. Based on our collective experience, and due to Spirit’s current financial situation, in our opinion this is unlikely. And in the unlikely event they are open to improving the TA, it may not happen on a timetable that is acceptable to our pilot group. We can look to the UAL negotiations as a recent example. The UAL/ALPA TA was put out for pilot ratification in June and then voted down. The parties have returned to the bargaining table, but to date no new TA has been announced and the timetable for one is unclear.” -SPA_ExecSummary
Don’t be unrealistic guys. If I could vote it would be a yes and then come back to the table during the successful or failed merger. Y’all can argue for Delta plus in about two years. |
Originally Posted by AndroidPilot
(Post 3564296)
“Arguably, it is possible that management could decide to return to the bargaining table quickly and offer more money. But throughout negotiations we need to deal with probabilities rather than possibilities. Based on our collective experience, and due to Spirit’s current financial situation, in our opinion this is unlikely. And in the unlikely event they are open to improving the TA, it may not happen on a timetable that is acceptable to our pilot group. We can look to the UAL negotiations as a recent example. The UAL/ALPA TA was put out for pilot ratification in June and then voted down. The parties have returned to the bargaining table, but to date no new TA has been announced and the timetable for one is unclear.” -SPA_ExecSummary
Don’t be unrealistic guys. If I could vote it would be a yes and then come back to the table during the successful or failed merger. Y’all can argue for Delta plus in about two years. |
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3564308)
They must be realllllly concerned about the current vote tally….
|
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3564308)
They must be realllllly concerned about the current vote tally….
|
Originally Posted by baseball3792
(Post 3564349)
I assume this was all pre-planned. They’re putting out information (in favor of their point of view) slowly and consistently to try to sway opinions (disclaimer, I agree with their opinion).
|
Heard an interesting thing on my last trip. Theory that if the JB NE alliance goes through, they'll use it as leverage with the feds to disband it and to rubber stamp the merger faster. If that happens, we'll be locked into whatever we have at the time since we will be under JB control. Not sure what the time line could be with this to happen but an interesting situation if it expedites fed approval, delaying a TA for a few more bucks could really hurt over the next few years.
|
Originally Posted by baseball3792
(Post 3564349)
I assume this was all pre-planned. They’re putting out information (in favor of their point of view) slowly and consistently to try to sway opinions (disclaimer, I agree with their opinion).
|
Originally Posted by AndroidPilot
(Post 3564296)
“Arguably, it is possible that management could decide to return to the bargaining table quickly and offer more money. But throughout negotiations we need to deal with probabilities rather than possibilities. Based on our collective experience, and due to Spirit’s current financial situation, in our opinion this is unlikely. And in the unlikely event they are open to improving the TA, it may not happen on a timetable that is acceptable to our pilot group. We can look to the UAL negotiations as a recent example. The UAL/ALPA TA was put out for pilot ratification in June and then voted down. The parties have returned to the bargaining table, but to date no new TA has been announced and the timetable for one is unclear.” -SPA_ExecSummary
Don’t be unrealistic guys. If I could vote it would be a yes and then come back to the table during the successful or failed merger. Y’all can argue for Delta plus in about two years. |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3564365)
We'll get em next time!
|
Originally Posted by AndroidPilot
(Post 3564370)
In this industry you will never “get ‘em next time”, especially when you have a limitless goal post. You in particular will always want more. Let the “yes” voters have a voice and stop canceling peoples opinions that are opposite of yours.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:09 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands