Search

Notices

Voting opened

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2022 | 12:46 PM
  #11  
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,190
Likes: 160
Default

It’s a tough vote. No right answer because no one has a crystal ball so everything is purely speculation.

1) We vote no and they drag their feet to come back to the table. Mainly because they’ll probably wait for the amendable date then it takes another 2-3 months for a better offer and another 1-1.5 months to bring it to a vote.

This will be happening while everyone goes into TPA (go into TPA with the current CBA?) so won’t be an expeditious process.

2) We vote no and we do get a better offer fast. This would be best case scenario, but no guarantee (obviously).

3) We vote yes, we take the pay and go into TPA and than JCBA. These rates would hold us over to really dig deep and claw for every penny on the JCBA.

4) We vote yes and the merger doesn’t go through. Go back to the table and negotiate from the new CBA rather than the old one.

Probably missed a scenario, but this is what comes to mind. We would be the highest paid ULCC for now (not counting JB as they’re a LCC, but quickly leaving that category).

Is voting down a $30-$40/hr pay raise for an additional $15/hr worth it (if even possible?)? Only the individual can answer that. I would just encourage everyone to get educated and vote what they feel is right. Good luck!
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 01:28 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
Spirit won’t survive in present form without a new contract attrition is too great and NH pay isn’t high enough. Vote this TA down and you’ll have a better agreement because management can’t afford not to give it. There’s only so many 750hr helicopter pilots around so they won’t be able to hire enough to change the tide.
Spirit isn’t surviving in present form anyway. It’s bleeding money and pilots. It’s either going to JetBlue or frontier.
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 02:06 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Default

Vote yes, take the money in the short term and get more soon in the merger tpa and jcba
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 02:53 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
It’s a tough vote. No right answer because no one has a crystal ball so everything is purely speculation.

1) We vote no and they drag their feet to come back to the table. Mainly because they’ll probably wait for the amendable date then it takes another 2-3 months for a better offer and another 1-1.5 months to bring it to a vote.

This will be happening while everyone goes into TPA (go into TPA with the current CBA?) so won’t be an expeditious process.

2) We vote no and we do get a better offer fast. This would be best case scenario, but no guarantee (obviously).

3) We vote yes, we take the pay and go into TPA and than JCBA. These rates would hold us over to really dig deep and claw for every penny on the JCBA.

4) We vote yes and the merger doesn’t go through. Go back to the table and negotiate from the new CBA rather than the old one.

Probably missed a scenario, but this is what comes to mind. We would be the highest paid ULCC for now (not counting JB as they’re a LCC, but quickly leaving that category).

Is voting down a $30-$40/hr pay raise for an additional $15/hr worth it (if even possible?)? Only the individual can answer that. I would just encourage everyone to get educated and vote what they feel is right. Good luck!
Thanks for the well-thought-out reply, much appreciated.
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 05:24 PM
  #15  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 275
Default

Bank the money and fight tomorrows fight, tomorrow.

But bank the money. This is free money, banked, and ours to get through the crap
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 05:43 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 128
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
It’s a tough vote. No right answer because no one has a crystal ball so everything is purely speculation.

1) We vote no and they drag their feet to come back to the table. Mainly because they’ll probably wait for the amendable date then it takes another 2-3 months for a better offer and another 1-1.5 months to bring it to a vote.

This will be happening while everyone goes into TPA (go into TPA with the current CBA?) so won’t be an expeditious process.

2) We vote no and we do get a better offer fast. This would be best case scenario, but no guarantee (obviously).

3) We vote yes, we take the pay and go into TPA and than JCBA. These rates would hold us over to really dig deep and claw for every penny on the JCBA.

4) We vote yes and the merger doesn’t go through. Go back to the table and negotiate from the new CBA rather than the old one.

Probably missed a scenario, but this is what comes to mind. We would be the highest paid ULCC for now (not counting JB as they’re a LCC, but quickly leaving that category).

Is voting down a $30-$40/hr pay raise for an additional $15/hr worth it (if even possible?)? Only the individual can answer that. I would just encourage everyone to get educated and vote what they feel is right. Good luck!
This is an easy no without a JetBlue merger. Easy! The following steps of the merger and passing on easy money now certainly complicate things

Your number 4 scenario while factual has no ending. All leverage will be lost.
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 05:50 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
This is an easy no without a JetBlue merger. Easy! The following steps of the merger and passing on easy money now certainly complicate things

Your number 4 scenario while factual has no ending. All leverage will be lost.
Not all leverage. This deal isn’t near enough to really help with attrition. At most, it’s a stopgap to help the bleeding for the next 6-12 months until it becomes jetblues problem. The leverage will not be lost.
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 06:00 PM
  #18  
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,190
Likes: 160
Default

Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
This is an easy no without a JetBlue merger. Easy! The following steps of the merger and passing on easy money now certainly complicate things

Your number 4 scenario while factual has no ending. All leverage will be lost.
I’m inclined to feel the same way if the merger wasn’t a thing. I would be worried if this was the best they could do for an offer during the current climate.

Honestly, I haven’t given much thought to your second point, but I don’t disagree with it
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 06:31 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 283
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
All leverage will be lost.
Exactly what leverage do we have now that we wouldn't have later?!
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 06:40 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 29
From: baller, shot caller
Default

Originally Posted by Poppachubby
Exactly what leverage do we have now that we wouldn't have later?!
Well right now we have the lowest first year pay in the industry.

Assuming this TA passes, first year pay will inevitably be moved up to industry leading or very close to it.

So there's that...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sun Tzu
JetBlue
194
07-20-2018 08:04 PM
DALFA
Delta
295
05-06-2017 09:04 AM
TurbineDriver
Southwest
3
11-07-2016 12:06 PM
ToiletDuck
Corporate
0
01-25-2007 05:41 PM
Tech Maven
Pilot Health
2
01-01-2006 03:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices