Search

Notices

Voting opened

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2022 | 08:13 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 283
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by SSlow
Well right now we have the lowest first year pay in the industry.

Assuming this TA passes, first year pay will inevitably be moved up to industry leading or very close to it.

So there's that...
If first year pay was what they are so desperate to change (the so-called leverage) then why didn't they raise first year right away on this TA? I think they are going more for retention than attracting.
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 08:33 PM
  #22  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 275
Default

Originally Posted by Poppachubby
If first year pay was what they are so desperate to change (the so-called leverage) then why didn't they raise first year right away on this TA? I think they are going more for retention than attracting.
Ding ding we have a winner

Company is so concerned about first year pay that they did NOT flat increase it in this TA when they could, union wanted to. They also didn’t move training pay much at all

Doesn’t seem like they are half as concerned as some pilots are.

Bank the money, move on to the next fight
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 09:09 PM
  #23  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 226
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Bank the money and fight tomorrows fight, tomorrow.

But bank the money. This is free money, banked, and ours to get through the crap
Vote how you want to, and what is best for you. But FFS stop talking about tomorrow's fight. Health insurance during training, training pay, first year pay and slope are fights we have lost for over a decade. I might vote yes, because I am not sure if we can do better. That doesn't make all the other issues tomorrow's fight. It means I will take my gains over other people's loss.
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 09:49 PM
  #24  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 275
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
Vote how you want to, and what is best for you. But FFS stop talking about tomorrow's fight. Health insurance during training, training pay, first year pay and slope are fights we have lost for over a decade. I might vote yes, because I am not sure if we can do better. That doesn't make all the other issues tomorrow's fight. It means I will take my gains over other people's loss.
Fight tomorrows fight as in we have multiple rounds of negotiations still to go, either with JBLU, NK, or maybe F9 and/or a combination of those. Guys acting like this is the vote to take a stand on, a 2 year contract, nope. Exactly why I’m taking the money now, free cash, and realizing the big items to actually “fight” are to come in the next steps.

Sorry but as much as I want more money for newhires, the company doesn’t even want to pay more, and they are the ones supposed to be “begging” for pilots, and last I checked, attracting pilots is still their problem
Reply
Old 12-30-2022 | 10:18 PM
  #25  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 226
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Fight tomorrows fight as in we have multiple rounds of negotiations still to go, either with JBLU, NK, or maybe F9 and/or a combination of those. Guys acting like this is the vote to take a stand on, a 2 year contract, nope. Exactly why I’m taking the money now, free cash, and realizing the big items to actually “fight” are to come in the next steps.

Sorry but as much as I want more money for newhires, the company doesn’t even want to pay more, and they are the ones supposed to be “begging” for pilots, and last I checked, attracting pilots is still their problem
“the company doesn’t even want to pay more “

But they agreed to pay us more. And not out of the kindness of their hearts. They calculate how much they need to offer to get 51%. And in the last contract they ended up over paying, as it was over 70% voted yes. How that money is spread around is up to us. Calling training pay tomorrow’s fight is disingenuous at best. Yes, we can take that money now, but we didn’t take a stand last time, and not doing it now, so probably won’t happen next time.
Reply
Old 12-31-2022 | 03:30 AM
  #26  
BananaHammock's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Poppachubby
Exactly what leverage do we have now that we wouldn't have later?!
Section 9 is the big change no one talks about for some reason
Reply
Old 12-31-2022 | 05:19 AM
  #27  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 275
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
“the company doesn’t even want to pay more “

But they agreed to pay us more. And not out of the kindness of their hearts. They calculate how much they need to offer to get 51%. And in the last contract they ended up over paying, as it was over 70% voted yes. How that money is spread around is up to us. Calling training pay tomorrow’s fight is disingenuous at best. Yes, we can take that money now, but we didn’t take a stand last time, and not doing it now, so probably won’t happen next time.
Great, and you can vote your vote and I’ll do the same, as will all non probationary pilots. The 10th will come and we will see how it shook out. Hopefully the merger gets worked out sooner vs later, and Ted and Bendo go off into the mist

Last edited by CincoDeMayo; 12-31-2022 at 05:33 AM.
Reply
Old 12-31-2022 | 05:45 AM
  #28  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 20
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Originally Posted by BananaHammock
Section 9 is the big change no one talks about for some reason
Not all of us want to be instructors to make decent bank…. That said, I am grateful those punks will finally have to bid their own seniority and not be able to cherry-pick trips…
Reply
Old 12-31-2022 | 05:50 AM
  #29  
gripngrab's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Default

Get out there and vote yessssss.
Reply
Old 12-31-2022 | 06:18 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Poppachubby
If first year pay was what they are so desperate to change (the so-called leverage) then why didn't they raise first year right away on this TA? I think they are going more for retention than attracting.
Maybe I’m misunderstanding what you’re saying, but doesn’t the table show $93 and some change for first year pay? I know training pay was a joke of an increase, but looks like first year was adjusted relatively well.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sun Tzu
JetBlue
194
07-20-2018 08:04 PM
DALFA
Delta
295
05-06-2017 09:04 AM
TurbineDriver
Southwest
3
11-07-2016 12:06 PM
ToiletDuck
Corporate
0
01-25-2007 05:41 PM
Tech Maven
Pilot Health
2
01-01-2006 03:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices