Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Spirit
Spirit Now Sure As It Emerges From Bankruptcy >

Spirit Now Sure As It Emerges From Bankruptcy

Search

Notices

Spirit Now Sure As It Emerges From Bankruptcy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2025 | 12:59 PM
  #901  
10and250's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
So on this

I’ve asked the NC about the lack of “fragmentation” pilots go with the planes”. As explained, it’s not helpful for NK pilots as it stands because NK leases almost of their planes. So there wouldn’t be a purchase to transfer assets solely, the planes are owned by a bank, not NK. So it’s not like UAL can come in and negotiate with NK to only buy the planes, because NK doesn’t own the planes. So as stated above, it’s not a scope provision that would help NK pilots with almost all planes being leased.

Now if UAL decides to say “hey we want to buy NK to merge”, furloughed pilots historically get placed at the bottom of the integrated seniority list, regardless of hire date, and will be integrated as a furloughed pilot on the new list below active pilots.
So, because the majority of our fleet are bank owned, is this more harmful than helpful considering if they were paid off, an acquiring airline could buy the planes only and tell the pilots to kick rocks?

What I am trying to understand is how desperately I should be trying to retain my recall rights while simultaneously trying to get hired on elsewhere, because, as I understand it, most job offers elsewhere are usually conditional upon giving up recall rights at your previous carrier.. Now I also understand that the value of having recall rights varies wildly depending if it's someone like Frontier vs. a legacy with better prospects and continued growth.
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 02:19 PM
  #902  
Chimpy's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 177
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
This is starting to turn into a cash/debt doom loop. As they try and sell assets to generate cash, they become smaller and make less revenue to pay debts, engine repairs, etc and then have to sell more assets to generate cash and so forth. I'm guessing Q2 financial are not looking very good as well as the forward looking cash flows as the timing of this announcement is at a time of peak airline revenues. It doesn't get better than Q2 with Q3 closely behind.

Good luck to everyone and get those apps out. American and United probably have the most growth over the next 4-5 years with massive retirements and lots of planes being delivered. If you can get to UA, DL or AA take the job while you can.

So why not just file CH11 again ( A real one) , get rid of the Debt and merge with F9... Seems like the only real way forward, no?
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 02:23 PM
  #903  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 275
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
So why not just file CH11 again ( A real one) , get rid of the Debt and merge with F9... Seems like the only real way forward, no?
Get rid of the debt that the bondholders/owners own? How do you just get “rid of the debt?” You can reorganize it, IF the creditors are wanting to and a judge agrees, but it’s not as simple as just “getting rid of the debt”



Like the Seinfeld episode, “it’s a write off…they just write it off”.
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 02:27 PM
  #904  
Chimpy's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 177
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo



Like the Seinfeld episode, “it’s a write off…they just write it off”.
Absolute Gold and about as far as my financial literacy goes, lol.
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 02:30 PM
  #905  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 438
Likes: 80
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Get rid of the debt that the bondholders/owners own? How do you just get “rid of the debt?” You can reorganize it, IF the creditors are wanting to and a judge agrees, but it’s not as simple as just “getting rid of the debt”



Like the Seinfeld episode, “it’s a write off…they just write it off”.
Schitt’s Creek also did this well

The write-off people!!
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 02:30 PM
  #906  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 439
Likes: 30
Default

Yea, the bondholders/creditors aren't going to just be like "yea, don't worry about it" on over $1BILLION in money owed.
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 02:35 PM
  #907  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 75
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
So why not just file CH11 again ( A real one) , get rid of the Debt and merge with F9... Seems like the only real way forward, no?

You can't just wipe out bondholders like you can stockholders. Now I think the current equity holders are driving this towards another bankruptcy. I don't see the upside. The best case is a pre-packaged Chapter 11. Another airline provides DIP financing, and bondholders receive 20-30 cents on the dollar, but these are financed through new bonds.
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 02:44 PM
  #908  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 441
Likes: 96
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Get rid of the debt that the bondholders/owners own? How do you just get “rid of the debt?” You can reorganize it, IF the creditors are wanting to and a judge agrees, but it’s not as simple as just “getting rid of the debt”



Like the Seinfeld episode, “it’s a write off…they just write it off”.
I believe that's Ch 7 bankruptcy, when you can't pay people back.
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 02:59 PM
  #909  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 487
Likes: 23
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
UAL is off the table as a merger partner. United already looked at the NK planes and its too time consuming and costly to reconfigure all the planes, especially since our seat supplier can barely keep up with our new planes and reconfiguring older planes, not to mention the debt and other integration issues.

Also with the Jetblue partnership, which was just granted full approval by the DOT, is going to be the focus going forward and not any acquisitions.
I completely agree that United has zero interest in us. To your other points.. didn’t we have 2 airlines in the past 3 years make offers to buy us ? One of them offering a whopping 3.1 billion knowing full well the cost of new seats, paint, integration headaches as well as our debt situation? Clearly these two airlines, knowing the headaches saw enough value to even get into a bidding war. Who’s to say someone else doesn’t see the same now ?

all I’m saying is if someone sees enough long term value for the right price they’ll make a move . Pilots are less needed now than 3 years ago, and Boeing just pumped out more planes than they have in 6 years.. so the dynamics have changed certainly. But if you offered me a totally dilapidated house in a sought after neighborhood at a bargain basement price .. no matter the headaches I face .. if I see long term value after the renovations.. ill snag it.
Reply
Old 07-29-2025 | 03:01 PM
  #910  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 275
Default

Originally Posted by 10and250
So, because the majority of our fleet are bank owned, is this more harmful than helpful considering if they were paid off, an acquiring airline could buy the planes only and tell the pilots to kick rocks?

What I am trying to understand is how desperately I should be trying to retain my recall rights while simultaneously trying to get hired on elsewhere, because, as I understand it, most job offers elsewhere are usually conditional upon giving up recall rights at your previous carrier.. Now I also understand that the value of having recall rights varies wildly depending if it's someone like Frontier vs. a legacy with better prospects and continued growth.
Frankly speaking; if any airline offers you a job when on furlough, you take it if it means resigning your recall rights. And yes, as explained to me by the NC, there really isn’t a likely scenario where someone comes in, wants NKs leased planes, the lease holder (bank) says ok, and the pilots go with it. Most likely the planes for back to the bank and then overseas. It’s why they haven’t proceeded with any scope fragmentation additions in these furlough MOUs, it isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hockeypilot44
Spirit
515
04-27-2020 07:36 PM
Group W Bench
Major
18
04-29-2012 07:17 PM
trent890
Charter
17
04-15-2012 06:39 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
06-02-2005 05:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices