Notices

Kirby was WRONG!

Old 01-03-2026 | 08:49 PM
  #71  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,176
Likes: 234
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
in other words, you have no idea how corporate debt works and try to apply your Dave Ramsey strategies.
I am, however, aware that AA paid out about $2 billion in interest expense on that debt in both 2023 and 2024, and will come very near that this year based on the first three quarters. We’ll know for sure when they announce their fourth quarter financials.

alt=""

And that because of their far lower profits and higher debt and debt to equity ratio they are paying higher interest than their legacy competitors. If you hope to convince me that’s a GOOD thing, you are certainly free to try, but I gotta warn you - you got your work cut out for you.

alt=""

alt=""
Reply
Old 01-03-2026 | 09:54 PM
  #72  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 438
Likes: 80
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
No pilot at United wants Spirit pilots to lose their jobs. At most, FORMER NKers came here to give insight on how it is on the other side.

You, however, chose to stay put at F9 in the best hiring environment in decades. Then you failed the interview at United (or maybe never interviewed at all cuz trolling is your thing?) so now you’re all butt hurt about it. Please spare us the misery
Thanks for saying what we were all thinking
Reply
Old 01-04-2026 | 06:55 AM
  #73  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,851
Likes: 654
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

AA's financials are not in three-alarm fire territory by any means.

But objectively they are not in as good a position as other legacies, and they might be in a tight spot in the face of a significant economic/industry downturn (they'd just need to tap some crisis financing, which would be available). In a black swan situation, they'd be the first to go (absent CARES style bailout).

If things keep chugging along, they'll be fine. They're also too big to fail, absolute worst that could happen would be Ch.11, furloughs and CBA haircuts... nothing really new in this industry.
Reply
Old 01-04-2026 | 07:19 AM
  #74  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,176
Likes: 234
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
AA's financials are not in three-alarm fire territory by any means.

But objectively they are not in as good a position as other legacies, and they might be in a tight spot in the face of a significant economic/industry downturn (they'd just need to tap some crisis financing, which would be available). In a black swan situation, they'd be the first to go (absent CARES style bailout).

If things keep chugging along, they'll be fine. They're also too big to fail, absolute worst that could happen would be Ch.11, furloughs and CBA haircuts... nothing really new in this industry.
Indeed. They are too big to fail, but not too big to go bankrupt if things got bad enough. Strangely enough, they were sort of the unicorn in their last bankruptcy, in that even their stockholders didn’t lose ALL of their money.
Reply
Old 01-04-2026 | 07:37 AM
  #75  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,851
Likes: 654
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Indeed. They are too big to fail, but not too big to go bankrupt if things got bad enough. Strangely enough, they were sort of the unicorn in their last bankruptcy, in that even their stockholders didn’t lose ALL of their money.
That was an era when BK was allowed as a matter of bookkeeping convenience, vice last-ditch survival option. So the court probably didn't see the equity in wiping out common shareholders if the company was only moderately distressed.

But laws have changed since, you need to be in really bad shape for the court to even entertain a BK plea now. That's for corporate, as far as I know individuals can still load up the lifestyle on credit cards and then just tap out at any time, no questions asked.
Reply
Old 01-04-2026 | 08:16 AM
  #76  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 153
From: 787 FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
That was an era when BK was allowed as a matter of bookkeeping convenience, vice last-ditch survival option. So the court probably didn't see the equity in wiping out common shareholders if the company was only moderately distressed.

But laws have changed since, you need to be in really bad shape for the court to even entertain a BK plea now. That's for corporate, as far as I know individuals can still load up the lifestyle on credit cards and then just tap out at any time, no questions asked.
Spirit's two trips to bankruptcy seems to undermine your corporate argument and the 2005 BAPCPA legislation made it more difficult, expensive, and less financially advantageous for consumer debtors to file for bankruptcy, particularly Chapter 7 liquidation.
Reply
Old 01-04-2026 | 08:25 AM
  #77  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,851
Likes: 654
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by jerryleber
Spirit's two trips to bankruptcy seems to undermine your corporate argument and the 2005 BAPCPA legislation made it more difficult, expensive, and less financially advantageous for consumer debtors to file for bankruptcy, particularly Chapter 7 liquidation.
My argument was that you need to be in financial dire straits. They were. Might there have been shenanigans along the way? Of course, but as long as you're actually broke you can still file.

Also in the case of airlines, you can't cut it quite as close as in other industries, since the FAA will start looking hard at your operating authority if you're near insolvent (safety). The court will recognize this fact and allow for it.

As I said, "as far as I know". My interest in that realm is limited to corporate law and business. Don't follow personal stuff. Glad to hear they made it harder, at the very least they should garnish the crap out of your wages if dig yourself a hole with lifestyle (more sympathy for medical debt, health-induced job loss, etc).
Reply
Old 01-04-2026 | 09:29 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,749
Likes: 55
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
That was an era when BK was allowed as a matter of bookkeeping convenience, vice last-ditch survival option. So the court probably didn't see the equity in wiping out common shareholders if the company was only moderately distressed.

But laws have changed since, you need to be in really bad shape for the court to even entertain a BK plea now. That's for corporate, as far as I know individuals can still load up the lifestyle on credit cards and then just tap out at any time, no questions asked.
AMR bankruptcy was well after the new legislation. Possibly to help facilitate the merger with usair? Also possible the new legislation helped shareholders obtain (provided some leverage) new stock in the combined company?
Reply
Old 01-04-2026 | 05:09 PM
  #79  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,851
Likes: 654
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
AMR bankruptcy was well after the new legislation. Possibly to help facilitate the merger with usair? Also possible the new legislation helped shareholders obtain (provided some leverage) new stock in the combined company?
OK, if it was under the new laws then different rules.
Reply
Old 01-04-2026 | 05:27 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,231
Likes: 65
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
My argument was that you need to be in financial dire straits.
Pretty sure that wasn't the case at F9 when they filed.

Originally Posted by rickair7777
OK, if it was under the new laws then different rules.
Pretty sure they did it after the law changes.

And YES, we ALL NOW, it was a strategic move...........
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
206321
United
36
05-11-2020 01:49 PM
vagabond
Safety
22
10-08-2014 08:07 PM
steamgauge
Cargo
159
04-11-2012 12:42 PM
ShyGuy
Regional
272
01-03-2012 04:15 PM
floridaCFII
Flight Schools and Training
29
05-09-2009 10:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices