Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS, Part II

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2015 | 10:27 AM
  #1371  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
Rates do matter because it's guaranteed money. The ability to earn credit over guarantee is a personal choice. I w2 as much as a United pilot, the difference is that I bid lines I don't like to get a transition conflict, I jump when my phone shoots a flica alert out and I try not to leave town just in case scheduling might call.

So the United pilot makes the same as me, has more days off, and gets a 16% retirement contribution. But hey I don't care about rates because my credit number at months end was so much higher, right? And if that United pilot picks up just one turn out of open time above guarantee he has now beat me in every category, except credit.

They don't deposit credit or pay rates in my bank account but pay rates at guarantee travel to my account on the path of least resistance at a fixed amount wheras credit is highly variable.

Pilots at the well paid airlines can make high credit too but they don't take a smaller pay rate for it.

Above all: SCOPE and LTD!!!!
I was trying to not write a book, so I went with bullet points.

I'll clarify for you. I have NO interest in working more than the minimum. You need to take bullet point 2 into account before judging my want list. I want max credit for the days I work because I want max days off on which to spend my earnings.

To be more specific, I want to make more than a quarter million bucks and never work more than 16 days a month for that amount.

My long time beotch is the trip average. It makes my rate look 18 to 20 percent lower than it used to be. IOW, the rate looked like a raise when we saw it in 2003, but we lost the ability to earn good credit per day and in the end, the pay check stayed pretty much the same. But, we got to say that we made more money per hour.

I'm not interested in making more per flight hour, but staying stagnant at months end. We need more money in our W2, not more money in our pay rate column.
Old 12-03-2015 | 10:36 AM
  #1372  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by RalphWiggum
So in one instance you argue for top industry pay at DOS yet in another post you admit you are a scheduling wh0re and don't even leave town for fear you miss out on a deal.

Good catch Ralph. Qotsaautopilot goes at it with me for arguing for higher earnings , earned on fewer work days; and includes info showing that he works more days now to make money.

I'm all for a industry leading W2 without having to work deals and/or work extra days. *

With that said, I suspect that all our differences are not as large in person as they are on the internet.

*I would also be happy to vote for a CBA that provided industry average wages for something like 68 flight hours/12 flying days and allowed for premium pay for those who chose to work more than that min (somewhat like SWA). What I don't want is a system that forces me to work long and hard to make industry average.
Old 12-03-2015 | 11:00 AM
  #1373  
RalphWiggum's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: DTW Left
Default

Originally Posted by GoMountaineers
Your kind words and light-heartedness will be missed.
While you're at it educate yourself on things like historical pattern bargaining, the NMB and the limitations our unions have. Add in what the negotiating committees have to deal with, their interactions with management reps and what the BODs want. it's a complex process. Also read up on how so much of this is tied to leverage. Leverage in part is made up of things like a favorable economy, profits, unified pilot groups, a labor friendly NMB etc etc. leverage is not gained from the oversimplification of this process you and others have stated. Spirit management penny pinches every chance they get. They won't hand over the raises you and Qotas want no matter how long you cry and sulk in the corner. We should and potentially will make very large gains across the board, but if you guys are this ignorant and unwilling to see a deal in its totality before you make up your minds then you're beyond any potential forum reasoning
Old 12-03-2015 | 11:08 AM
  #1374  
RalphWiggum's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: DTW Left
Default

Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
According to your pattern bargaining plan, we should have jumped to the front in 2010. Giving 2010's performance and the fact we went through the hassle of getting released, went on strike, and ended up with this (for lack of a better term) CBA, proves it is the NC that doesn't understand pattern bargaining and leverage.
You are not correct. Being released doesn't entirely foreshadow an industry leading gains just like it doesn't guarantee or preclude a shutdown. In C2010 the rates were not as substandard as they are now. Care to remember what even USair was making at the time ? The only substantial leverage we had at the time was being on strike. We did not have long and sustained profitability with record margins. We didn't have the growth or size leverage we have now and will continue to see grow into the future
Old 12-03-2015 | 11:15 AM
  #1375  
RalphWiggum's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: DTW Left
Default

Originally Posted by skybolt
Good catch Ralph. Qotsaautopilot goes at it with me for arguing for higher earnings , earned on fewer work days; and includes info showing that he works more days now to make money.

I'm all for a industry leading W2 without having to work deals and/or work extra days. *

With that said, I suspect that all our differences are not as large in person as they are on the internet.

*I would also be happy to vote for a CBA that provided industry average wages for something like 68 flight hours/12 flying days and allowed for premium pay for those who chose to work more than that min (somewhat like SWA). What I don't want is a system that forces me to work long and hard to make industry average.
I couldn't agree more with this
Old 12-03-2015 | 12:04 PM
  #1376  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by skybolt
Good catch Ralph. Qotsaautopilot goes at it with me for arguing for higher earnings , earned on fewer work days; and includes info showing that he works more days now to make money.

I'm all for a industry leading W2 without having to work deals and/or work extra days. *

With that said, I suspect that all our differences are not as large in person as they are on the internet.

*I would also be happy to vote for a CBA that provided industry average wages for something like 68 flight hours/12 flying days and allowed for premium pay for those who chose to work more than that min (somewhat like SWA). What I don't want is a system that forces me to work long and hard to make industry average.
Just because I work a lot now doesn't mean I want to do it forever. It's tiring and not sustainable over a career.
Old 12-03-2015 | 12:42 PM
  #1377  
Rainbows's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: Low paid Airbus gear slinger
Default

Talk about going off half-cocked, you guys are already arguing like we got a TA. We ain't heard or seen a thing yet, until we have a piece of paper to look at, we don't know crap!
Old 12-03-2015 | 01:23 PM
  #1378  
GoMountaineers's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by RalphWiggum
. . .Spirit management penny pinches every chance they get. They won't hand over the raises you and Qotas want no matter how long you cry and sulk in the corner. . . .
Yeah, they might make mean faces at us, too, if we ask for too big a raise.
Old 12-03-2015 | 02:29 PM
  #1379  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Does not change my mind, I want industry leading in all areas, no "path to parity" for me. Parity on DOS, industry leading within our non-industry standard 5 year contract (again), or just add one more no vote to the pot.
Old 12-03-2015 | 02:42 PM
  #1380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Audi2000
Does not change my mind, I want industry leading in all areas, no "path to parity" for me. Parity on DOS, industry leading within our non-industry standard 5 year contract (again), or just add one more no vote to the pot.
Aren't you the guy that said his brother worked for INDIGO and an Allegiant merger was hours away circa 2010? Just apply elsewhere so I don't have to listen to you complain in the crew room
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
De La Ghetto
Flight Schools and Training
22
11-26-2014 05:41 PM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
emj55
Major
8
06-04-2008 03:58 AM
downinthegroove
Regional
2
06-03-2008 05:55 PM
N618FT
Regional
34
11-19-2007 07:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices