Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Question for Intl Arrival Procedure >

Question for Intl Arrival Procedure

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Question for Intl Arrival Procedure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2008, 09:13 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
shanKs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: HS-125
Posts: 95
Default Question for Intl Arrival Procedure

Hi, first post here but I have a burning question that nobody can seem to find the answer for and I'd love to pick the brains of you guys flying internationally or in Asia.

I was on a trip to Shanghai and ran into a problem concerning arrival procedures. When I'm paging through Jepps for arrivals (outside the US), the larger airports seem to have a massive amount of published arrivals but no way to plan ahead of time what arrival I will be issued.

I'll cite a specific example (see attached image):

My cleared flight plan route was a jet airway ending at "AND" VOR to DADAT int to ZSPD airport. As we approached AND we asked, but were given no specific arrival procedure until 20 seconds before arriving at the VOR and then were cleared the 22A arrival. Some quick fingers on the FMS and activating the arrival got us where we needed to go, but my question finally is - is there a way to plan ahead of time what arrival you can expect? (nothing was on the atis regarding arrivals, only runway in use for landing) I was guessing the 24A since DADAT was in my cleared route but of course I was wrong at the last minute.


I hope there is an obvious answer to someone, since these types of arrivals are new to me. Thanks in advance
shanKs is offline  
Old 04-06-2008, 09:33 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

You were right to assume 24A cause of DADAT. Not much else you can do about it. I've gone into PVG a few times and always got what I was expecting, but you need to be on your toes, I guess. The altimetry being in meters is a pain in the butt, too.
de727ups is offline  
Old 04-06-2008, 10:02 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 137
Default

Don, Hijack ,where do you normally go on your trips.
t-cart is offline  
Old 04-06-2008, 10:05 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

I'm on reserve so hardly do international anymore. Lately I've been to Fresno, Portland, Louisville, Rockford, Des Moines, and Fresno.
de727ups is offline  
Old 04-06-2008, 02:13 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ranger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD-11/10 Captain
Posts: 533
Default

I would agree with the above response. Your guess was based on what you saw on your flight plan/release. If you have a secondary flight plan function as part of your FMS system you could consider putting the other arrival/runway into it and then simply activating it if they spring the late change on you. A lot of folks would build the reciprocal runway in the secondary out of habit. Coming from the south, as you did on this arrival, if they did do a complete runway change and have to take you up north, you'd still have plenty of time to rebuild the arrival and runway.
Ranger is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 06:52 PM
  #6  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Default

First post here as well. I was doing some research (google) on another topic and came across your post. I figured I would sign up and offer some possible clues to your experience since I know the details of this day at ZSPD.

Looking at the time of your post I am guessing that you were flying with a 0803 database in cycle 0802 or 0803 effective date. Chinese authorities delayed the opening of Pudong runways 17 and 35 in the middle of the 0803 release. Because of this delay the new procedures that were to go into effect were no longer valid upon the 0803 effective date. Atleast not until March 25,2008. Notams were issued and charts updated back to the old procedures between March 13 to March 25th. The good thing about the charts is that they are usually reviewed to be updated every 15 days while the database is only every 28 days. Here is where we get the disconnect and confusion.

The Chinese ATC knew of this problem and had to guide clearance as they came in. Some Airlines issued internal notams to inform their pilots that the new procedure are not valid until later. The problem is that once the new effective date hits, the old procedures are not accessible in the database.

Anyway, sorry for the long write... I think it was this problem and the timing of your flight into this airport that caused the delay from ATC.

Cheers,

P.S. seems like an interesting site. I look forward to reading this forum.

Last edited by Skyrider; 04-15-2008 at 07:49 PM.
Skyrider is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
snippercr
Flight Schools and Training
5
02-24-2008 09:27 PM
ERJ135
Regional
26
01-24-2008 12:39 PM
iarapilot
Cargo
2
07-27-2007 09:50 AM
cargo hopeful
Cargo
21
03-05-2006 06:12 AM
Cjp21
Major
6
02-28-2006 06:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices