Search
Notices
Trans States Airlines Regional Airline

Trans States Emergency Meeting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2007, 04:39 AM
  #41  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default Flight Time

Originally Posted by ScaryKite View Post
trans states has had a rep for hiring some low time guys, but they do not budge at all for performance. Its actually a good way to hire because the difference between 500 hours and 1500 hours could be a simple difference of how many landings you have saved in the pattern. Until there is quite a bit of IFR cross country experience, most instructing is just adding hours into your logbook. So I think its a relatively good thing to hire people and give them a shot, if they cant cut it, so be it. I definatley think TSAs training was very thorough and fair. If you didnt make it, probably a good thing. Thats one thing I will give TSA props for is the training department, most every captain I flew with was very knowledgeable, professional with the door open, and all in all a damn good pilot.
You are right 1000 hours of flight instructing really is useless to an airline. The minimums are really only a way to reduce the number of applicants. It has nothing to do with pilot skills.

SkyHigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 03-30-2007, 06:53 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B727
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post
I dont think if you dont have a degree you are some how not as good of a pilot. In fact I know thats not true. However if minimum flight time for hiring was higher and a degree was required for employment then more than likely pay would go up. The degree will continue to become less and less important This is just another way for MGMT to "Dumb" down the job. They can justify paying less and less if qualifications aren't important. Just my thoughts. So do you think i have a degree or not? worth 20 points!!!
Unfortunately, management doesn't base pay on qualifications. They base it on supply and demand. It's always been and always will be that way. If the day comes that they can't fill the seats without raising the pay, they'll do it, but only as much as they think they have to. On the other hand, qualifications will follow raised pay. There are lots of highly qualified guys with many thousands of hours of jet transport time on the sidelines because they won't work for a bag of peanuts and a diet coke per leg. When the pay goes up enough (it may never happen, but it's looking more favorable) some of them will be back.
org1 is offline  
Old 03-30-2007, 01:27 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post
I dont think if you dont have a degree you are some how not as good of a pilot. In fact I know thats not true. However if minimum flight time for hiring was higher and a degree was required for employment then more than likely pay would go up. The degree will continue to become less and less important This is just another way for MGMT to "Dumb" down the job. They can justify paying less and less if qualifications aren't important. Just my thoughts. So do you think i have a degree or not? worth 20 points!!!
1. One of the great misunderstandings about aviation is that pilots are paid and chosen just to fly. While flying skills and qualifications are important, they are only one of the facets of being a professional pilot- except maybe for some one being paid to fly aerobatics. A pilot is normally paid to fly an aircraft from point a to point b. Associated with this flying are other important duties, depending on the type of flying. A passenger airline pilot, for example, is in the customer service industry and is being paid to safely move people from point a to point b, and to do so in a manner that makes them want to fly your brand again. While the possession of a college degree does not automatically bestow on the recipient the tools needed to handle these "non-aviation" aviation related tasks, it does demonstrate that the individual has been tested on problem solving of some sort (be it mathematics, people skills/management, etc). This is also why military personnel often have a leg up on people who came through the civilian route. Normally military personnel are put into problem solving and leadership situations that assist them later on. This does not mean pilots coming through the civilian route do not possess these skills- just as a high school graduate, with the correct experience, can have problem solving skills better than a college graduate. There is just a greater chance of getting these opportunities in the military, thus a greater chance of hiring some one with those skill sets.
2. The above applies to aerobatic teams as well. When the Blue Angels and Thunderbirds interview, flying skills are only one of the many discriminators they use. I experienced the same while being interviewed in the Army for the special operations aviation unit. A big part of the assessment was the check ride, but it was only PART of the assessment, and a pilot could still make it in if he busted the check ride. (BTW, I busted. I was 45 seconds late to the target- an unlit, grass strip that I had to find at night, +- 30 seconds).
3. When screening and hiring pilots, it is not an "either/or" proposition between flying experience and education or demonstrated problem solving skills. Usually you can find people with skills in both areas, and normally these people are better aviators. Maybe the bush pilot is more precise at putting a C-180 down in a stream bed, but that is not airline flying. Airline flying is precisely flying an ILS; diagnosing problems that arise; the correct use of the resources at your disposal. One of the things I HATE to read in an incident summary at my airline is a captain writing, "I immediately took the controls from the FO and performed the _______ immediate action items." Worst thing a captain can do, and statistically leads to more accidents, but it is what most pilots used to a single pilot environment do. Heck, 99.9% of the time a monkey could do my job. It is that .1%, however, that I get paid for. Every emergency I have had has involved much more than just wiggling controls- they have been more about system analysis and problem solving.
Again, I am not writing a pilot without a college degree has no chance of getting the skills needed to be a professional pilot. Nor that pilots with college degrees or military experience possess these skills. Just that the odds are greater.
Enough of high jacking this thread. Wasn't it about TSA or something??

Last edited by Blackhawk; 03-30-2007 at 02:20 PM.
Blackhawk is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rballTy
Part 135
5
02-17-2020 02:21 PM
iahflyr
GoJet
27
03-11-2007 09:15 AM
Luv2FLY79
Trans States Airlines
10
01-25-2007 07:45 AM
dmb911
Trans States Airlines
1
07-18-2006 06:21 AM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
0
06-01-2005 03:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices