Trans States
#7111
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,054
From looking into the previous posts I came up with:
December 3rd 9 CQFO'S, 3 FO's
December 16th 13 CQFO's, 3 FO's
January 5th 20 CQFO’s, 5 FO’s
January 14th 15 CQFO’s, 3 FO’s
The numbers I am coming up with are around 57 CQFO's and 14 FO's since December 3rd. Are these numbers accurate?
Thanks,
Speed
December 3rd 9 CQFO'S, 3 FO's
December 16th 13 CQFO's, 3 FO's
January 5th 20 CQFO’s, 5 FO’s
January 14th 15 CQFO’s, 3 FO’s
The numbers I am coming up with are around 57 CQFO's and 14 FO's since December 3rd. Are these numbers accurate?
Thanks,
Speed
Now, some TSA guy, praying enough of you get duped into coming to TSA so he can upgrade, will come here and argue this point. They will say that TSA needs CQFOs first and foremost and THAT is why there are so few FOs so far; they need the CQFOs for their expansion. But if your company was growing, wouldn't you also need the same amount of expansion in your FO ranks as well?
Beware of this place. TSA has a grand history of lying to their pilots. Look back through older TSA stuff and see how they hire in spring and furlough in fall.
#7112
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
In the "other" TSA thread, someone said:
Most CQFOs will be paired with CQFOs. Perhaps the company wanted it that way, but obviously TSA is not getting enough regular FOs. You guys need to stop lying to potential new hires. They come to this forum to get information, not propaganda that is easily dismissed with logic.
Now, some TSA guy, praying enough of you get duped into coming to TSA so he can upgrade, will come here and argue this point. They will say that TSA needs CQFOs first and foremost and THAT is why there are so few FOs so far; they need the CQFOs for their expansion. But if your company was growing, wouldn't you also need the same amount of expansion in your FO ranks as well?
Beware of this place. TSA has a grand history of lying to their pilots. Look back through older TSA stuff and see how they hire in spring and furlough in fall.
Most CQFOs will be paired with CQFOs. Perhaps the company wanted it that way, but obviously TSA is not getting enough regular FOs. You guys need to stop lying to potential new hires. They come to this forum to get information, not propaganda that is easily dismissed with logic.
Now, some TSA guy, praying enough of you get duped into coming to TSA so he can upgrade, will come here and argue this point. They will say that TSA needs CQFOs first and foremost and THAT is why there are so few FOs so far; they need the CQFOs for their expansion. But if your company was growing, wouldn't you also need the same amount of expansion in your FO ranks as well?
Beware of this place. TSA has a grand history of lying to their pilots. Look back through older TSA stuff and see how they hire in spring and furlough in fall.
You can be jealous and angry if you'd like. TSA didn't take concessions and you did. TSA is seeING growth and you're not.
#7113
In the "other" TSA thread, someone said:
Most CQFOs will be paired with CQFOs. Perhaps the company wanted it that way, but obviously TSA is not getting enough regular FOs. You guys need to stop lying to potential new hires. They come to this forum to get information, not propaganda that is easily dismissed with logic.
Now, some TSA guy, praying enough of you get duped into coming to TSA so he can upgrade, will come here and argue this point. They will say that TSA needs CQFOs first and foremost and THAT is why there are so few FOs so far; they need the CQFOs for their expansion. But if your company was growing, wouldn't you also need the same amount of expansion in your FO ranks as well?
Beware of this place. TSA has a grand history of lying to their pilots. Look back through older TSA stuff and see how they hire in spring and furlough in fall.
Most CQFOs will be paired with CQFOs. Perhaps the company wanted it that way, but obviously TSA is not getting enough regular FOs. You guys need to stop lying to potential new hires. They come to this forum to get information, not propaganda that is easily dismissed with logic.
Now, some TSA guy, praying enough of you get duped into coming to TSA so he can upgrade, will come here and argue this point. They will say that TSA needs CQFOs first and foremost and THAT is why there are so few FOs so far; they need the CQFOs for their expansion. But if your company was growing, wouldn't you also need the same amount of expansion in your FO ranks as well?
Beware of this place. TSA has a grand history of lying to their pilots. Look back through older TSA stuff and see how they hire in spring and furlough in fall.
wow you're trolling hard this morning...
#7115
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,054
Riiighhtt
I post logics and you post lies and point fingers. Nice work.
I post logics and you post lies and point fingers. Nice work.
#7119
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,054
I'm not buying it number one; you guys have told a few whoppers on here already. Second, I'd be amazed if it kept up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post