Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United pax forcibly removed from flight >

United pax forcibly removed from flight

Search

Notices

United pax forcibly removed from flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2017, 01:22 AM
  #571  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 121
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped
So what is your solution. You're the agent. A crew of must ride's shows up and must get on board last minute to protect a downline flight from cancelling. Passengers have boarded. You don't get any volunteers. What are you going to do?
That's a good interview question!!
lgaflyer is offline  
Old 04-13-2017, 01:43 AM
  #572  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 5
Default

https://www.inc.com/cynthia-than/the...t-matters.html
AmericanFlyer is offline  
Old 04-13-2017, 01:57 AM
  #573  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fletch727's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by Goosent
The fact that UA publicly admitted the flight was not "overbooked" is a very strong evidence against them at court.
Also, if UA wants to prove it was an overbook/oversold case, they will have to prove these employees were booked/ had purchased tickets on the flight. My guess is if they were, the passengers would have been denied boarding earlier or held at the gate waiting for the employees to arrive.
Some folks mentioned about Force Majeure earlier...I used FM before and would say it is impossible for UA to apply FM in this case because UA had many many ways to transport their employees to Louisville and high cost (regardless how high) never constitutes a Force Majeure.

Goosent - it appears you are new here, welcome. It also appears you may not be employed in the industry...? It would take a phone conversation to explain everything that goes into how an airline operation functions on a daily basis. But, to address your comment that there would be a case if, indeed, the flight was not oversold but sold to capacity, in my opinion, would be weak. Even if there was a policy at United to not oversell, situations like this occur all the time. Just look at Jet Blues denied boarding numbers.

Things change on a minute by minute basis at an airline. Whether or not that crew of four was previously booked, any number of things could have happened to require them to be quickly booked and placed on that flight. Happens all the time, especially during irregular operations due to inclement weather. These forced bookings have now made the flight oversold, by four, therefore putting the gate agents the painful position of having to go through the process of probably ruining someone's day, unless there are volunteers willing to take in some easy money/tickets, or whatever, and take the next a available flight.

What not a single blowhard news anchor seems to understand, since no news agency is willing to have their "airline consultants" appear on their shows to explain it - these crew members are considered Must Rides, because they are going to be taking another plane load of people somewhere else that has to go, and have duty day limitations and rest requirements established by federal law to abide by (Colgan crash a number of years ago should ring bell - if not, google it). Taking a car ride is not really an option 99.9% of the time. If the booked crew or crewmember doesn't get on the plane, the operation gets messed up, and depending on the aircraft type, hundreds if not thousands of people in one day would be inconvenienced by delays and missed connections during an entire day as a result (considering a crew was to take out the first flight of the day early in the morning, and subsequent crews are unable to make up the lost time during the rest of the days scheduled flights for that aircraft).

With all this rambling, the point is that there are countless tidbits that play into this mess that will be covered by the attorneys. My personal opinion? He should get compensation in the form of what he would have received at the time he was being removed and seek further damages from the Aviation Police Department. The request was legal on part of United, whether he liked it or not. United's Customer Service Representatives requested assistance from law enforcement due to his escalation and unwillingness to exit the aircraft - they did not touch him. He told the Police the only way he would exit is if he was dragged out, and they obliged. His blood is due to resisting, not because he stood up and walked out.

On the other side, obviously change needs to be made, and most definitely will - how could anyone disagree? But, everything was handled per a protocol that has been successful and in affect for probably decades, and that had never led to what you are seeing today - who could have predicted a tantrum-driven adult would cause so much pain? It sickens me that he will probably walk away with millions from this, especially given his character based on published public documents.

Last edited by Fletch727; 04-13-2017 at 02:19 AM. Reason: Text was missing once posted.
Fletch727 is offline  
Old 04-13-2017, 02:09 AM
  #574  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by EF77
You're the prototypical tool that drives a car with a license plate that says PILOT so you make sure everyone on the road knows you're an a**, just not the crew member you just got done flying with.
You nailed it! That's me. A vanity plate on my 15 yr old pickup. LOL. That would be AWESOME, baby. I'm just tired of all the resident experts on this forum. It's worse than Facebook. I know that misery loves company....but c'mon man.
jsled is offline  
Old 04-13-2017, 04:48 AM
  #575  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shindo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
People like you scare me. You and others on this board would have no problems with a cop walking on board and then putting a bullet in his head and dragging the corpse off the plane.

"Hey man, it's his own fault. He shoulda complied."

Psychopaths.
You're an idiot.

This passanger was told to get off by the airline, he refused and the authorities had to ask the same thing and he still refused. They had to forcefully remove him and since he resisted his face hit the armrest. This was all his fault and he should be charged with a crime.
Shindo is offline  
Old 04-13-2017, 04:48 AM
  #576  
Production Test Pilot
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: Production Test Pilot, Boeing
Posts: 110
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
You nailed it! That's me. A vanity plate on my 15 yr old pickup. LOL. That would be AWESOME, baby. I'm just tired of all the resident experts on this forum. It's worse than Facebook. I know that misery loves company....but c'mon man.
CAPTNR1 would be awesome
Claybird is offline  
Old 04-13-2017, 04:53 AM
  #577  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shindo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
First, it wasn't oversold according to United's own statements, which 250.5(a) states as the condition for which the rest of what you put in there applies.

Second, he had already boarded. He wasn't denied boarding, making 250.5 irrelevant.

Third, $1350 isn't necessarily the max. Here's a lengthy explanation of why linked below. Caveat, this is debated, and I'm waiting for a credible source (i.e. FAA/DOT) to clarify.
The Widely-Misreported $1350 Maximum Offer for A Passenger Voluntarily Giving Up A Seat

Now, even if that was the max for IDB, and even if IDB was applicable (it's not for the stated reasons in 1 and 2 above IMO), airlines can compensate for IDB, then throw whatever flight vouchers, gift cards, hotels, food vouchers, loss of work comp, etc that they want not for direct compensation for involuntarily losing their seat, but for the inconvenience, or stress, or goodwill, or whatever they want to call it. Airlines and companies can give money to (mostly) whomever they want for (mostly) whatever reason they want. No government agency would ever fine an airline for compensating someone more than they are required. Those laws are written to protect the flying public, and lay out what the companies must provide for IDB. Going above that when it is mutually beneficial isn't violating any laws, or intent of laws, and I think the FAA would agree. I guess we will see, as that will likely be made more clear with this.
Doesn't matter, he was told to deplane. He doesn't get to argue commands.
Shindo is offline  
Old 04-13-2017, 05:35 AM
  #578  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Downwind, headed straight for the rocks, shanghaied aboard the ship of fools.
Posts: 1,128
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
How exactly did United bloody a passenger?
Goggles is right. In the end the doctor bloodied himself by resisting. That said, I think it's completely ridiculous to remove a perfectly fine already boarded passenger from a plane to cover operational problems. That's the real issue here. If you can't get volunteers then leave the late deadheads behind. I know the pro-union tyoes won't like this, but there was still one seat left up front. If either pilot had taken it this wouldn't be worldwide news today. I'm not saying that taking the jumpseat and empowering the doctor is neccessarily the right thing to do. But I've ridden up there many times in similar situations and I've had many UA and AA pilots come up front after explaining they volunteered to do so to get someone on board. I think that's great and good customer service and thank them for it after welcoming them aboard. In the end, this is a customer service job. The airlines are going to have to come up with a definitive plan for deadheaders to prevent this going forward. I see much more civil disobedience going forward from boarded passengers refusing to leave when asked to. And in this case I agree with them.
SpeedyVagabond is offline  
Old 04-13-2017, 05:43 AM
  #579  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 570
Default

Some of you just don't get it. Regardless of what company policy is, what officers told him, whether or not he was right or flat out wrong... United is guilty in the court of public opinion which is going to cost United in $$$. That's the bottom line and this could have been avoided or settled in a better way than it was. Go ahead and argue with consumers about policy and fine print, they'll just book with a different airline in the near future.

Last edited by Taco280AI; 04-13-2017 at 06:01 AM.
Taco280AI is offline  
Old 04-13-2017, 05:55 AM
  #580  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
Where's your personal threshold of punishment for defiance against authority?

You're obviously good with a face full of armrest as an appropriate punishment.

What about summary execution? Still good?

The "face full of armrest" wasn't punishment, it was incidental to the police getting him to comply. Whether that was an over reaction on the cops' part isn't clear since we don't see what led up to the armrestification of his face. Punishment would be the fine for trespassing on the aircraft after UAL revoked his privilege to be there. Restitution would be the amount the Dr. pays UAL for the armrest he broke while committing a crime, and the ensuing bio-hazard cleanup.
Plane Ramrod is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
CommuteAir
5406
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
sfitz
Military
125
01-16-2019 02:32 PM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
757Driver
Major
26
08-09-2011 05:50 AM
MobiusOne
Foreign
12
05-09-2008 09:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices