Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United pax forcibly removed from flight >

United pax forcibly removed from flight

Search
Notices

United pax forcibly removed from flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2017, 10:51 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,824
Default



The latest interwebs meme.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 04-10-2017, 10:52 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 182
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
The Contract of Carriage Document is available on-line, no media interpretation required. There is no list for removing passengers who have boarded.






.
Tony, read the first sentence of your post I quoted above. "UA shall have the right to refuse to transport or shall have the right to remove from the aircraft at any point,"
Falcondrivr is offline  
Old 04-10-2017, 10:54 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
Nice ad hominem attack. That bolsters your position significantly.


So, you're going to try to redefine "board", too?


Good luck with that.






.
Tony Denied Boarding is an industry term. If you want to get technical about the law, the CFRs actually read denial of a reserved seat, not boarding. So there goes your theory out the window Clarence.
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 04-10-2017, 10:54 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Viperstick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 280
Default

Originally Posted by thevagabond View Post
You are tool of the week for writing this. The guy paid for a ticket. He should get to ride. I hope he sues the airline. If I were on the jury I would vote to award a generous settlement. I'm sure if you had to be someplace and paid for a ticket that you would be the most gracious passenger ever as evidenced by your mature and adult like posts on this forum.
I hope he sues too...and loses, and has to pay the court costs. No lawyer in their right mind would take this case. Read the contract of carriage. Read the law regarding being directed by police to comply with their direction. The pax has no case, except in the emotional court of public opinion.
Viperstick is offline  
Old 04-10-2017, 10:54 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

I predict that the Vagabond who is a moderator will forcibly remove this thread from its seat.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 04-10-2017, 10:56 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 132
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
The Contract of Carriage Document is available on-line, no media interpretation required. There is no list for removing passengers who have boarded.


.
Be that as it may, you said:

Furthermore, the passengers were told the individuals to be removed were selected by the computer, not from a boarding priority list.
And I'm saying that unless you know someone who was on the plane, then you read that in a news article. To which I replied:

Because the news always reports aviation stories accurately, right?
b82rez is offline  
Old 04-10-2017, 11:09 AM
  #87  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 72
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
Whenever I had to DH on an oversold United flight, I was always told by the gate agent that they would get to me AFTER they were done boarding.
If you have a seat it doesn't make sense. But if you don't have a seat, they wait until the end for a no show so they can give you that person's seat. If they gave you a seat when you walked up, now they have to deal with an annoyed passenger who probably picked that seat to be next to someone, wanted a window, whatever reason they want to give... I know this because this exact thing happened to me a couple weeks ago.
Master of FiFi is offline  
Old 04-10-2017, 11:10 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default

So UAL only goes up to $800 for denied boarding compensation? I've always wondered what the amount was. I wonder if this will cause UAL to change their overbooking formula and or their maximum denied boarding compensation?
Nevjets is offline  
Old 04-10-2017, 11:11 AM
  #89  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Falcondrivr View Post

Originally Posted by RULE 21 REFUSAL OF TRANSPORT
RULE 21 REFUSAL OF TRANSPORT
UA shall have the right to refuse to transport or shall have the right to remove from the aircraft at any point, any Passenger for the following reasons:
  1. Breach of Contract of Carriage – Failure by Passenger to comply with the Rules of the Contract of Carriage.
  2. Government Request, Regulations or Security Directives – Whenever such action is necessary to comply with any government regulation, Customs and Border Protection, government or airport security directive of any sort, or any governmental request for emergency transportation in connection with the national defense.
  3. Force Majeure and Other Unforeseeable Conditions – Whenever such action is necessary or advisable by reason of weather or other conditions beyond UA’s control including, but not limited to, acts of God, force majeure, strikes, civil commotions, embargoes, wars, hostilities, terrorist activities, or disturbances, whether actual, threatened, or reported.
  4. Search of Passenger or Property – Whenever a Passenger refuses to submit to electronic surveillance or to permit search of his/her person or property.
  5. Proof of Identity – Whenever a Passenger refuses on request to produce identification satisfactory to UA or who presents a Ticket to board and whose identification does not match the name on the Ticket. UA shall have the right, but shall not be obligated, to require identification of persons purchasing tickets and/or presenting a ticket(s) for the purpose of boarding the aircraft.
  6. Failure to Pay – Whenever a Passenger has not paid the appropriate fare for a Ticket, Baggage, or applicable service charges for services required for travel, has not paid an outstanding debt or Court judgment, or has not produced satisfactory proof to UA that the Passenger is an authorized non-revenue Passenger or has engaged in a prohibited practice as specified in Rule 6.
  7. Across International Boundaries – Whenever a Passenger is traveling across any international boundary if:
    1. The government required travel documents of such Passenger appear not to be in order according to UA's reasonable belief; or
    2. Such Passenger’s embarkation from, transit through, or entry into any country from, through, or to which such Passenger desires transportation would be unlawful or denied for any reason.
  8. Safety – Whenever refusal or removal of a Passenger may be necessary for the safety of such Passenger or other Passengers or members of the crew including, but not limited to:
  9. Any Passenger who, by reason of engaging in the above activities in this Rule 21, causes UA any loss, damage or expense of any kind, consents and acknowledges that he or she shall reimburse UA for any such loss, damage or expense. UA has the right to refuse transport, on a permanent basis, to any passenger who, by reason of engaging in the above activities in this Rule 21, causes UA any loss, damage or expense of any kind, or who has been disorderly, offensive, abusive, or violent. In addition, the activities enumerated in H) 1) through 8) shall constitute a material breach of contract, for which UA shall be excused from performing its obligations under this contract.
  10. UA is not liable for its refusal to transport any passenger or for its removal of any passenger in accordance with this Rule. A Passenger who is removed or refused transportation in accordance with this Rule may be eligible for a refund upon request. See Rule 27 A). As an express precondition to issuance of any refund, UA shall not be responsible for damages of any kind whatsoever. The passenger’s sole and exclusive remedy shall be Rule 27 A).

I'd think there's probably a good case for 25:H,2 ...

Passengers who fail to comply with or interfere with the duties of the members of the flight crew, federal regulations, or security directives;
Notice the first sentence of the Rule:
UA shall have the right to refuse to transport or shall have the right to remove from the aircraft at any point, any Passenger for the following reasons:
Rule 25 says the airline can remove a passenger for any of those reasons, but prior to the passenger being selected to be removed, he had boarded, taken his seat, and declined offers to give up his seat voluntarily. How is that "failure to comply with or interfere with the duties of the members of the flight crew"?

Sure, he resisted leaving the airplane after he was selected to be removed, but that act of resistance cannot be claimed to be the reason for removal when the selection for removal occurred before that behavior occurred.



Originally Posted by Falcondrivr View Post

... and 25:H,4.

Passengers who, through and as a result of their conduct, cause a disturbance such that the captain or member of the cockpit crew must leave the cockpit in order to attend to the disturbance;
Again, you cannot claim the behavior which occurred as the passenger was removed is the justification for his selection for removal. That's like punishing you for an infraction you will commit in the future.

(It's also unlikely a member of the cockpit crew had to leave the cockpit to attend to the disturbance.)





Originally Posted by Falcondrivr View Post

However, the smart thing to do will be delay, file motions, and then settle. But I'm no lawyer.

Sure, that's the way to make our legal system work to serve justice. Why bother with trying to do the right thing when you can obfuscate, delay, and outspend your opponent?

That's why people are so disgusted with lawyers and the legal system.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 04-10-2017, 11:15 AM
  #90  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Falcondrivr View Post

Tony, read the first sentence of your post I quoted above. "UA shall have the right to refuse to transport or shall have the right to remove from the aircraft at any point,"

And there's a long list of conditions under that statement. As I posted before, please cite the condition which applied.

The gentleman presented his boarding pass, boarded the aircraft, occupied his assigned, reserved, paid seat, and declined offers to voluntarily surrender his seat. At that point, which behavior or condition described in Rule 25 applied?






.
TonyC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
CommuteAir
5406
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
sfitz
Military
125
01-16-2019 02:32 PM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
757Driver
Major
26
08-09-2011 05:50 AM
MobiusOne
Foreign
12
05-09-2008 09:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices