Search

Notices

737-900 lga?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2017 | 06:13 PM
  #21  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
I'm sure the load planners have already thought about this. It won't be doing long enough flights to have consistent performance issues. Probably just ORD or IAH
FWIW, the UA restrictions for the 900ER in LGA still include wet and contaminated runways. If it is scheduled for anything other than last minute e-subs with CAVU conditions I suspect it will not be a reliable operation.

And speaking of the planners thinking about this, it reminds me of the time I showed up at DCA on a rainy day and was assigned a 900ER for a transcon to SFO. (Hint: We did not leave full and on such a high yield route even passengers with "status" were left at the gate.). It was not our finest hour but it beat a cancellation.

Last edited by cadetdrivr; 05-09-2017 at 06:26 PM.
Reply
Old 05-11-2017 | 12:49 AM
  #22  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
I haven't seen LGA much the last 10 or so years. And it's apples to oranges, but pre 9/11 DAL took the L-1011 and 764 in/out of there also with just those 2 destinations IIRC.

As they taxied out of the alley you'd practically get blown into Flushing bay if you were at the blast fence.



Ain't called extra runway for nuthin'
Big, long range airplanes flying 2 hour flights take off like rockets, as they are extremely light. You can take any wide body from LGA-ATL. I think the limit for LGA is the taxiways are too close together. A 764 looks like Godzilla taxiing there.
Reply
Old 05-11-2017 | 06:23 AM
  #23  
Shrek's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
25M+ Airline Miles
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 100
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Big, long range airplanes flying 2 hour flights take off like rockets, as they are extremely light. You can take any wide body from LGA-ATL. I think the limit for LGA is the taxiways are too close together. A 764 looks like Godzilla taxiing there.
..... God-zirra
Reply
Old 05-11-2017 | 10:10 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,233
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Big, long range airplanes flying 2 hour flights take off like rockets, as they are extremely light. You can take any wide body from LGA-ATL. I think the limit for LGA is the taxiways are too close together. A 764 looks like Godzilla taxiing there.
I knowwwwwww....

Hence the apples and oranges part of my post.

But the sheer size of those planes combined with a possible reject in La Garbage seemed like it'd be a sight to see. Just like and extra/entire runway 73.
Reply
Old 05-11-2017 | 01:31 PM
  #25  
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 6
From: 777
Default

UAL used to fly 767-200's into LGA. I flew them there. In fact, there was a separate taxi speed gage just to the left of the AS indicator. There were taxi speed restrictions. They were afraid stopping the plane too quickly would shear the pavement right off the pilings.

Yes, taxiing around was the biggest problem. Space, the wings hung over everything.
Reply
Old 05-11-2017 | 01:41 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 188
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
UAL used to fly 767-200's into LGA. I flew them there. In fact, there was a separate taxi speed gage just to the left of the AS indicator. There were taxi speed restrictions. They were afraid stopping the plane too quickly would shear the pavement right off the pilings.

Yes, taxiing around was the biggest problem. Space, the wings hung over everything.
All the 767-200's had the taxi speed gauge. Some of the early 767-300's had them also before Boeing realized the IRU groundspeed was good enough.
Delta flew the L1011 from LGA to DFW. That was before they removed the dykes at the runway ends. You always expected a big thump going off the end but somehow it worked.
Reply
Old 05-11-2017 | 01:43 PM
  #27  
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 6
From: 777
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
All the 767-200's had the taxi speed gauge. Some of the early 767-300's had them also before Boeing realized the IRU groundspeed was good enough.
Delta flew the L1011 from LGA to DFW. That was before they removed the dykes at the runway ends. You always expected a big thump going off the end but somehow it worked.
Yup, the only reason the -200 had the taxi speed gage, was LGA. And yes, the IRU's were new, and they didn't trust the GS readouts yet. Who knew...
Reply
Old 05-11-2017 | 04:01 PM
  #28  
fireman0174's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 1
From: Retired 121 pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
UAL used to fly 767-200's into LGA. I flew them there.

Yes, taxiing around was the biggest problem. Space, the wings hung over everything.
United and American operated DC-10's out of LGA. I flew a few trips side saddle (UAL) and it was cozy taxiing around. As I recall it was to ORD only. United only operated the 10 into LGA for a few months, American a longer period.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Lerxst
United
172
02-05-2013 06:58 AM
1Seat 1Engine
Major
11
06-15-2007 05:20 AM
SWAjet
Major
2
07-22-2005 04:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices