Search

Notices

Contract Survey

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2017 | 02:31 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Really? It was probably the most comprehensive and thoughtfully laid out product they could have produced. You couldnt take 10 more minutes to actually look at the numbers? It was pretty clear, and they did a hell of a job laying it out pretty clearly.
I agree, it's an outstanding document.

Not being willing to put more than 10 minutes into such an important topic is exactly what we're up against. This is the same reason there are so few people at union meetings.

Oh well. We'll get the contract we deserve.

Last edited by nopac6; 06-05-2017 at 02:49 PM.
Reply
Old 06-05-2017 | 02:41 PM
  #12  
cal73's Avatar
Redeye avoider
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 933
Likes: 14
From: 737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Nevjets
Thanks, but as far as I can tell, that only shows your own airline's documents.


What do you mean?
It compares in bullet points, the main contract areas of our peers. I found the narrow body/ regional ratio comparison to be the most eye opening.

You're right it doesn't compare full language.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 06-05-2017 | 04:08 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by nopac6
I agree, it's an outstanding document.

Not being willing to put more than 10 minutes into such an important topic is exactly what we're up against. This is the same reason there are so few people at union meetings.

Oh well. We'll get the contract we deserve.
Did anything in the guide surprise you?
Reply
Old 06-05-2017 | 04:09 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by cal73
What do you mean?
It compares in bullet points, the main contract areas of our peers. I found the narrow body/ regional ratio comparison to be the most eye opening.

You're right it doesn't compare full language.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He's not United so he can't access it.
Reply
Old 06-05-2017 | 11:19 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Did anything in the guide surprise you?
I didn't realize AA had 200 more airplanes than we do.
Reply
Old 06-06-2017 | 08:43 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by nopac6
I didn't realize AA had 200 more airplanes than we do.
I saw nothing in the report that caught me by surprise, including aircraft fleet sizes, pay rates, rigs, reserve rules, etc, comparisons.

I chose to fill out the survey without completely reading the guide, knowing that I could refer back to the guide if I needed clarification on anything. I didn't need to refer back to the guide when I filled out the survey. While it's nice to read every single aviation related publication out there, a lot of the stuff I read is the same as other sources of information I've already read so I don't read everything cover to cover. If you find my methodology distasteful, I can't help you because I'm not going to spend a couple hours rereading stuff I already know.
Reply
Old 06-06-2017 | 09:02 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default

You're back-pedalling and making yourself look silly.

What Grumble and I were reacting to was your comment:

"I spent 10 minutes looking at it and didn't make it through very far. I wish there had been a Cliff Notes version highlighting those areas where we're behind our peers."

In other words, you couldn't be bothered to even read the whole thing.

Now you say:

"I saw nothing in the report that caught me by surprise"

Well, if you "didn't make it very far" then it's pretty obvious why you saw nothing that caught you by surprise.

Nobody said you have to read "every single aviation related publication," but it would be nice if you could at least read the ones put out by your own union. Especially the ones that are this comprehensive and come at an important time in our history.

That's ok, the rest of us can study the material and invest the cranium time necessary to make wise decisions.
Reply
Old 06-06-2017 | 09:09 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Ah, another attempt at virtue shaming. I will make sure to read cover to cover every 84 page document the ALPA puts together before filling out future contract surveys. Thanks; I feel absolutely terrible that I filled out the contract survey without spending several hours reading the accompanying document cover to cover.
Reply
Old 06-06-2017 | 09:36 AM
  #19  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Ah, another attempt at virtue shaming. I will make sure to read cover to cover every 84 page document the ALPA puts together before filling out future contract surveys. Thanks; I feel absolutely terrible that I filled out the contract survey without spending several hours reading the accompanying document cover to cover.
FWIW, I did the survey without opening the contract comparison. The survey was asking me where I thought the contract could be improved. I don't need a guide to figure out what my opinion is.
Reply
Old 06-06-2017 | 11:00 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
FWIW, I did the survey without opening the contract comparison. The survey was asking me where I thought the contract could be improved. I don't need a guide to figure out what my opinion is.
Obviously, by showing up month after month and working under this contract, you already have an informed enough opinion to fill out the survey. Nobody's said otherwise. But Andy saying he couldn't focus for longer than 10 minutes on the comparison document seems lame. If that constitutes "virtue shaming" then I'm profoundly sorry.

Last edited by nopac6; 06-06-2017 at 11:14 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM
TANSTAAFL
Major
79
03-09-2011 04:50 PM
wags3539
Regional
4
08-21-2009 06:11 PM
old gasser
Union Talk
28
06-08-2008 12:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices