Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
IAH787 grandfather rights >

IAH787 grandfather rights

Search
Notices

IAH787 grandfather rights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2017, 05:14 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default IAH787 grandfather rights

No CBA on my phone, Can someone post the language regarding equipment closures and grandfather rights in the case of IAH787, if any?

Open new equipment bid, or recall for displaced IAH787 pilots?
awax is offline  
Old 09-08-2017, 05:47 PM
  #2  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
No CBA on my phone, Can someone post the language regarding equipment closures and grandfather rights in the case of IAH787, if any?

Open new equipment bid, or recall for displaced IAH787 pilots?
8-C-6 When a vacancy or vacancies occur in a Category from which a Pilot(s) has been displaced under the provisions of Section 8-E, the displaced Pilot(s) shall, for a period of 120 days beyond the effective date of his displacement, be offered in order of seniority the vacancy prior to awarding that position under the provisions of Section 8-C-5. This 120 day period is measured from the effective date of the displacement to the date on which the vacancy bulletin is published.
svergin is offline  
Old 09-08-2017, 06:41 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Thanks for posting that - so the effective date for future IAH flying for the purpose of recall has to be October 30, 2017 + 120 days. Or, February 27, 2018.
awax is offline  
Old 09-08-2017, 08:48 PM
  #4  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
Thanks for posting that - so the effective date for future IAH flying for the purpose of recall has to be October 30, 2017 + 120 days. Or, February 27, 2018.
The way I read it, and I'm assuming this legacy language is from the UAL contract, then 100% of the IAH 787 CA/FOs will all get to come back ahead of any other pilots on any vacancy bid posted before that date.

LCAL didn't have language in our contract like this as I recall.
svergin is offline  
Old 09-09-2017, 08:43 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by svergin View Post
The way I read it, and I'm assuming this legacy language is from the UAL contract, then 100% of the IAH 787 CA/FOs will all get to come back ahead of any other pilots on any vacancy bid posted before that date.

LCAL didn't have language in our contract like this as I recall.
Each displacement had a different effective date. The first round of displacements was 1701 if I remember correctly. You have to add 120 days to each displacement. If someone took a voluntary bump early on, their rights may expire before the vacancy opens.
El10 is offline  
Old 09-09-2017, 09:42 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 804
Default

Originally Posted by El10 View Post
Each displacement had a different effective date. The first round of displacements was 1701 if I remember correctly. You have to add 120 days to each displacement. If someone took a voluntary bump early on, their rights may expire before the vacancy opens.
True, but you have to figure that when somebody takes a voluntary bump, it is because they really wanted the bid, and the paid move.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 09-09-2017, 10:32 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by El10 View Post
Each displacement had a different effective date. The first round of displacements was 1701 if I remember correctly. You have to add 120 days to each displacement. If someone took a voluntary bump early on, their rights may expire before the vacancy opens.
I think the earliest displacement was 1709D with an effective date of 8/29/17 which if I'm reading the language above correctly puts the grandfather rights out in December sometime.

May 3, 2017
Dear IAH 787 Captains and First Officers,

As announced in the April 6th Townhall/Message from Howard, the 787 fleet will cease flying out of IAH at the end of October, 2017. As a result, the IAH 787 category is now in phase out status. The first displacement will open today, and will involve a displacement of twenty (20) IAH 787 captains and twenty (20) IAH 787 first officers. Under the provisions in Section 8-E of the UPA, this letter constitutes formal displacement notice to twenty (20) IAH 787 captains and twenty (20) IAH 787 first officers, as shown on the attached lists, with an effective date of August 29, 2017. The pilots listed on the attached sheet are required to submit
displacement bids in CCS using the procedures below by 1200 CT on May 17, 2017.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 09-09-2017, 11:38 AM
  #8  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox View Post
I think the earliest displacement was 1709D with an effective date of 8/29/17 which if I'm reading the language above correctly puts the grandfather rights out in December sometime.
Which means 100% of them will be able to come back if they want, since this route starts in January, the vacancy bids are going to have to be in advance of that for sure.
svergin is offline  
Old 09-09-2017, 03:56 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slats Extend's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 393
Wink

Scabfather rights....At least some that bumped to will leave the west coast
Slats Extend is offline  
Old 09-09-2017, 04:16 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Default

Originally Posted by svergin View Post
Which means 100% of them will be able to come back if they want, since this route starts in January, the vacancy bids are going to have to be in advance of that for sure.
As it should be. For the company to not offer those IAH 787 crews who were bumped first right of refusal would be unacceptable. Even beyond 120 days IMHO.
Andy is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jsled
United
232
07-24-2016 09:34 AM
Dave Behnke
Cargo
109
08-27-2014 01:45 PM
AA gear puller
Major
109
11-15-2010 11:03 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
jungle
Money Talk
8
11-20-2008 07:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices