Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Yay!  ORD/AKL 787 announced. Ord 787 Base? >

Yay! ORD/AKL 787 announced. Ord 787 Base?

Search
Notices

Yay! ORD/AKL 787 announced. Ord 787 Base?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2018, 07:53 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Slats Extend's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 393
Thumbs down Yay! ORD/AKL 787 announced. Ord 787 Base?

Nope! Code Share with ANZ...
Slats Extend is offline  
Old 03-27-2018, 08:19 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: B756 FO
Posts: 1,288
Default

Originally Posted by Slats Extend View Post
Nope! Code Share with ANZ...
Yup! And the company is wanting more of this?

Don’t forget scope on the JV front is just as important as the RJ front.
SUX4U is offline  
Old 03-27-2018, 11:51 PM
  #3  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

This isn't JV it is Star Alliance. This has been allowed for a long time. Still, I wish it were us.

The 787-10 starts showing up soon. It is a 12 hour airplane. I wouldn't be surprised to see an ORD and or EWR 787 base. Europe and SA flying. It is a great replacement for the early 777's lUAL bought. It is their natural replacement.
Probe is offline  
Old 03-28-2018, 05:29 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

Originally Posted by Probe View Post
This isn't JV it is Star Alliance. This has been allowed for a long time. Still, I wish it were us.

The 787-10 starts showing up soon. It is a 12 hour airplane. I wouldn't be surprised to see an ORD and or EWR 787 base. Europe and SA flying. It is a great replacement for the early 777's lUAL bought. It is their natural replacement.
Right now, with the seating configurations, it would be a stretch to have the 787-10 replace the 777 A's. The A's now have 364 seats. I don't know what the UAL configuration will be but many are around 300 seats.

Remember, the A350 order was supposed to replace the early 777's. The oldest of which was built in 1994. If someone were to ask me, a good replacement for the 777's would be a new 777.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 03-28-2018, 05:31 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Default

Originally Posted by SUX4U View Post
Yup! And the company is wanting more of this?

Don’t forget scope on the JV front is just as important as the RJ front.
Yup. DAL led the way in giving away 50 seat scope, they’re now doing it giving away their upper end widebody flying to JV. The die has been cast.

Originally Posted by Probe View Post
This isn't JV it is Star Alliance. This has been allowed for a long time. Still, I wish it were us.

The 787-10 starts showing up soon. It is a 12 hour airplane. I wouldn't be surprised to see an ORD and or EWR 787 base. Europe and SA flying. It is a great replacement for the early 777's lUAL bought. It is their natural replacement.


Per UALs recent investor update:
Attached Images
Grumble is offline  
Old 03-28-2018, 05:41 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 756 left
Posts: 753
Default

Originally Posted by Probe View Post
This isn't JV it is Star Alliance. This has been allowed for a long time. Still, I wish it were us.

The 787-10 starts showing up soon. It is a 12 hour airplane. I wouldn't be surprised to see an ORD and or EWR 787 base. Europe and SA flying. It is a great replacement for the early 777's lUAL bought. It is their natural replacement.

Don't be surprised if some, or all, of the 787-10 orders get deferred.
89Pistons is offline  
Old 03-28-2018, 08:55 AM
  #7  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by Probe View Post
This isn't JV it is Star Alliance. This has been allowed for a long time. Still, I wish it were us.

The 787-10 starts showing up soon. It is a 12 hour airplane. I wouldn't be surprised to see an ORD and or EWR 787 base. Europe and SA flying. It is a great replacement for the early 777's lUAL bought. It is their natural replacement.
I still remember the “codeshare” that CAL and UAL had, which was basically an outsourcing of CAL to United. While it was true we didn’t let code share partners fly anything bigger than a 50 seater, we would fly passengers into a United hub with their CAL bought ticket and then go get on a 747 and fly to Asia, etc. We were never going to get a big widebody fleet like United while we were outsourcing this much flying.

If you’re interested, here is the list of the last one filed. With the exception of 2 routes flown by CAL, the rest was all UAL.

Continental and UNITED on 21AUG09 issued several applications for codeshare routes.

Additional planned codeshare routes are the following:
UNITED operated by Continental
Newark – Beijing
Newark – Shanghai

Continental operated by UNITED
Chicago – Beijing
Chicago – Shanghai
San Francisco – Beijing
San Francisco – Guangzhou (should UNITED decides to go ahead with the launch)
San Francisco – Shanghai
Washington – Beijing (service via Tokyo in W09/10 season)

Chicago – Cancun
Chicago – Cozumel
Chicago – Los Cabos
Chicago – Mexico City
Chicago – Puerto Vallarta
Denver – Cancun
Denver – Los Cabos
Denver – Puerto Vallarta
Los Angeles – Cancun
Los Angeles – Los Cabos
Los Angeles – Mexico City
Los Angeles – Puerto Vallarta
San Francisco – Cancun
San Francisco – Los Cabos
San Francisco – Mexico City
San Francisco – Puerto Vallarta
Washington Dulles – Cancun
Washington Dulles – Mexico City

*points between US and Japan, which UNITED operates:
Tokyo – Chicago
Tokyo – Honolulu
Tokyo – Los Angeles
Tokyo – San Francisco
Tokyo – Seattle
Tokyo – Washington Dulles
Osaka – San Francisco

*points between US and Vietnam
San Francisco – Hong Kong – Ho Chi Minh (Hong Kong currently not included in codeshare application)
svergin is offline  
Old 03-28-2018, 09:38 AM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Pilot ;)
Posts: 91
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald View Post
Right now, with the seating configurations, it would be a stretch to have the 787-10 replace the 777 A's. The A's now have 364 seats. I don't know what the UAL configuration will be but many are around 300 seats.
I dont really agree here Dave...
The UA configurations on the 772 range from 266-364. I doubt a new airplane will be outfitted like the current 777As are - The Old UA Business class seat which is 2-4-2 config. But, if you take the Singapore 787-10 seat map (334 seats) and put in the Old UA Business seat instead of the Singapore Business seat, Id imagine you'd get pretty close to 360. If not, also consider that the 777A has 3-4-3 in coach and the Business Cabin does not extend aft of the 2L/R doors. I don't have info on the area of the seating cabins, but I think they're very close. All depends on how they want to configure the plane.
BoJet is offline  
Old 03-28-2018, 09:59 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,138
Default

Originally Posted by Slats Extend View Post
Nope! Code Share with ANZ...
It is not a total loss......SFO - AKL is now going year around with this announcement.

Previously we were seasonal and during the summer NZ flew daily and 3 times weekly. Now NZ is only daily and UA is taking over the 3 times weekly flight year around.

doesn't help ORD pilots .......
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 03-28-2018, 10:05 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Half wing's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: 787 right
Posts: 504
Default

Originally Posted by BoJet View Post
I dont really agree here Dave...
The UA configurations on the 772 range from 266-364. I doubt a new airplane will be outfitted like the current 777As are - The Old UA Business class seat which is 2-4-2 config. But, if you take the Singapore 787-10 seat map (334 seats) and put in the Old UA Business seat instead of the Singapore Business seat, Id imagine you'd get pretty close to 360. If not, also consider that the 777A has 3-4-3 in coach and the Business Cabin does not extend aft of the 2L/R doors. I don't have info on the area of the seating cabins, but I think they're very close. All depends on how they want to configure the plane.
JC told me the final 787-10 configuration will have 318 seats. I’m not talking about Jesus.
Half wing is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GoCats67
United
123
10-05-2013 09:23 PM
EWR73FO
Major
32
02-25-2013 04:46 PM
JetPhotos
Your Photos and Videos
13
11-12-2012 09:12 PM
David Watts
United
12
12-11-2010 07:21 AM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
1
04-04-2007 06:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices