Line pilots to be "pretend" students for TK
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 403
I had a chat with a friend who's a guppy PI. He's pulling down quite a bit of cheddar; much more than I would as a 777 FO flying 90 hrs/mo on yr 12 pay. I'd need to do ~130 hrs/mo to make the same.
Either he was lying to me or PIs are getting a ton of credit hours every month.
Either he was lying to me or PIs are getting a ton of credit hours every month.
Per the UPA, I/Es (no longer PIs), are maxed out as “best held” 90 hrs per month plus $1215 override, so that would be the min. Best held means u have to be at least senior 1 WB FO to get WB pay.
Max of 3 overtimes at 5.3 hrs for 1st 2 OTs and 200% on 3rd OT makes a a max of 21.2 hrs add pay. So the max would be 111.2 hrs of 9th yr FO pay + $1215.
Evaluators(Captains) are not capped obviously, but the same hourly rate applies, $111.2 is max hrs plus override($1350 or
$1485)
Historically speaking it was a snowballs chance in hell to get 3 OT events. It’s only the last 3-6 months where this has been easier on the 737 fleet due to shortages.
If your friend was TDY from IAH last summer, then he was getting paid Per Diem for the time he was away from home + $25 a day for the days he worked. TDY pay went away last August.
#72
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Wow. Really?
1. My old airline (Part 121) farmed out the entire training department to Flight Safety.
2. American Airlines instructors are not on the seniority list.
3. United Airlines had non seniority list instructors prior to and during the 1985 strike.
To be clear, I am NOT advocating for any change in the status quo of having United Airlines pilots on the seniority list conduct our training. We would be fools to even consider it.
1. My old airline (Part 121) farmed out the entire training department to Flight Safety.
2. American Airlines instructors are not on the seniority list.
3. United Airlines had non seniority list instructors prior to and during the 1985 strike.
To be clear, I am NOT advocating for any change in the status quo of having United Airlines pilots on the seniority list conduct our training. We would be fools to even consider it.
I said upthread that I want line pilots doing the instruction; that hasn't changed. I assumed, incorrectly, that this was the norm at all airlines.
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Either he was lying to you, you misunderstood him, or he is one of a few rare “uncapped” instructors who isn’t capped at 9th yr FO pay which is what the UPA dictates(Uncapped Instructors are guys who were grandfathered under the previous contract or won a grievance to match those who were grandfathered)
Per the UPA, I/Es (no longer PIs), are maxed out as “best held” 90 hrs per month plus $1215 override, so that would be the min. Best held means u have to be at least senior 1 WB FO to get WB pay.
Max of 3 overtimes at 5.3 hrs for 1st 2 OTs and 200% on 3rd OT makes a a max of 21.2 hrs add pay. So the max would be 111.2 hrs of 9th yr FO pay + $1215.
Evaluators(Captains) are not capped obviously, but the same hourly rate applies, $111.2 is max hrs plus override($1350 or
$1485)
Historically speaking it was a snowballs chance in hell to get 3 OT events. It’s only the last 3-6 months where this has been easier on the 737 fleet due to shortages.
If your friend was TDY from IAH last summer, then he was getting paid Per Diem for the time he was away from home + $25 a day for the days he worked. TDY pay went away last August.
Per the UPA, I/Es (no longer PIs), are maxed out as “best held” 90 hrs per month plus $1215 override, so that would be the min. Best held means u have to be at least senior 1 WB FO to get WB pay.
Max of 3 overtimes at 5.3 hrs for 1st 2 OTs and 200% on 3rd OT makes a a max of 21.2 hrs add pay. So the max would be 111.2 hrs of 9th yr FO pay + $1215.
Evaluators(Captains) are not capped obviously, but the same hourly rate applies, $111.2 is max hrs plus override($1350 or
$1485)
Historically speaking it was a snowballs chance in hell to get 3 OT events. It’s only the last 3-6 months where this has been easier on the 737 fleet due to shortages.
If your friend was TDY from IAH last summer, then he was getting paid Per Diem for the time he was away from home + $25 a day for the days he worked. TDY pay went away last August.
He was an IAH PI on the 737, now at TK. I was shocked at how much he said he grossed last year. Not jealous, just shocked; I figured that he had to ***** himself out quite a bit to make that much.
I also hear some insane numbers on occasion from fellow line swine. I'll pick up extra days on occasion but I'm not going to try to kill myself in order to try grossing >$300K (including PS) in a year.
#74
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
I was one of those 2172. I know that some of those prior contract provisions required many of us to get hired with the block hours being flown in the first place.
As for the other carriers, how many of them retired every single one of their DC-10s, 747-200s, 727s, and 737-200's within the span of a couple of months? United was the only one to retire that many fleets in such a short period of time.
You're out of your mind to blame the furloughs on the contract. In fact the furloughs got as high as they did because the contract wasn't protected. It wasn't taken away. It was given away. And when we were done giving they came and took the rest.
One of the things that upsets me the most is that the No Furlough Clause wasn't defended. Maybe it wouldn't last through court but don't throw your hands up and give it away like it was.
Lastly, many say the term manpower positive including myself. The correct term should be manpower neutral. The goal should be to stay away from negative.
As for the other carriers, how many of them retired every single one of their DC-10s, 747-200s, 727s, and 737-200's within the span of a couple of months? United was the only one to retire that many fleets in such a short period of time.
You're out of your mind to blame the furloughs on the contract. In fact the furloughs got as high as they did because the contract wasn't protected. It wasn't taken away. It was given away. And when we were done giving they came and took the rest.
One of the things that upsets me the most is that the No Furlough Clause wasn't defended. Maybe it wouldn't last through court but don't throw your hands up and give it away like it was.
Lastly, many say the term manpower positive including myself. The correct term should be manpower neutral. The goal should be to stay away from negative.
No fallacy. We should be allowed to drop further below minimum days off on a voluntary basis. We should be allowed to fly over vacation on a voluntary basis. I have no use for the rest of those bullets. Just my opinion of course. In general, I am happy with the JCBA as it removed most of the crazy UAL ALPA rules that were "manpower positive" in our old contract. I say keep it coming. The more productive, the better. Lean and mean. Profitable. That's how you grow.
In the next downturn, management is going to park some of our older equipment until they right-size supply with reduced demand. The best way to minimize furloughs IMHO is to have pilots allowed to fly a ton of hours during the good times so that all that's required is to reducing the number of flying hours in line construction, as is currently listed in 5-B-1-(a)-1. But I'd tighten that up a bit, not allowing the company to construct lines above 80 hrs if any pilot's furloughed.
In addition, I'd open up 20-P-1-h to allow pilots to drop down to zero hours rather than have to do a voluntary furlough.
The downside to allowing a ton of flying during good times is that some pilots will get hooked on 100+ credit hour paychecks and will not be happy when their hours are reduced. But by cutting the number of hours they're able to fly, furloughs would be significantly reduced.
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
OK, that's just insane. I don't follow what goes on at TK, but that should not be permitted. A single PI can't effectively act as both instructor and fill-in during a full motion simulator period.
#76
It is legal for certain training events. And it does occur from time to time.
#78
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,017
It’s the 2 letter code for the Denver training center. There’s lots of theories about how “TK” was chosen, but I’ve never heard anything other than speculation. Since the merger, it’s no longer “officially” TK, but at United, it’ll always be TK, just as the 737 will always be the Guppy.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 403
9th to 12th yr WB FO pay's only a 4% difference. Not enough to be a serious deterrent IMHO.
He was an IAH PI on the 737, now at TK. I was shocked at how much he said he grossed last year. Not jealous, just shocked; I figured that he had to ***** himself out quite a bit to make that much.
I also hear some insane numbers on occasion from fellow line swine. I'll pick up extra days on occasion but I'm not going to try to kill myself in order to try grossing >$300K (including PS) in a year.
He was an IAH PI on the 737, now at TK. I was shocked at how much he said he grossed last year. Not jealous, just shocked; I figured that he had to ***** himself out quite a bit to make that much.
I also hear some insane numbers on occasion from fellow line swine. I'll pick up extra days on occasion but I'm not going to try to kill myself in order to try grossing >$300K (including PS) in a year.
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 403
As a fellow 2172, I have to agree with guppie. I'd prefer a much leaner operation where there are, as he stated, we should be allowed to drop below minimum days and fly over vacation on a voluntary basis.
In the next downturn, management is going to park some of our older equipment until they right-size supply with reduced demand. The best way to minimize furloughs IMHO is to have pilots allowed to fly a ton of hours during the good times so that all that's required is to reducing the number of flying hours in line construction, as is currently listed in 5-B-1-(a)-1. But I'd tighten that up a bit, not allowing the company to construct lines above 80 hrs if any pilot's furloughed.
In addition, I'd open up 20-P-1-h to allow pilots to drop down to zero hours rather than have to do a voluntary furlough.
The downside to allowing a ton of flying during good times is that some pilots will get hooked on 100+ credit hour paychecks and will not be happy when their hours are reduced. But by cutting the number of hours they're able to fly, furloughs would be significantly reduced.
In the next downturn, management is going to park some of our older equipment until they right-size supply with reduced demand. The best way to minimize furloughs IMHO is to have pilots allowed to fly a ton of hours during the good times so that all that's required is to reducing the number of flying hours in line construction, as is currently listed in 5-B-1-(a)-1. But I'd tighten that up a bit, not allowing the company to construct lines above 80 hrs if any pilot's furloughed.
In addition, I'd open up 20-P-1-h to allow pilots to drop down to zero hours rather than have to do a voluntary furlough.
The downside to allowing a ton of flying during good times is that some pilots will get hooked on 100+ credit hour paychecks and will not be happy when their hours are reduced. But by cutting the number of hours they're able to fly, furloughs would be significantly reduced.
Study history much? Please take a trip down memory lane and remove the blinders...
The last downturn, you couldn't stop pilots picking up overtime, and the union couldn't even suggest it. If you think management will agree to a clause in the UPA that will restrict them from being efficient while, God forbid, we have furloughs, you are willing to give up much more than most to line your own pockets. Ask the FedEX guys how they enjoyed their reduced schedule during the last downturn with a clause that was similar to what you suggest...
Without a clause like this in the UPA, pilots will justify picking up overtime like they have done time and time again because they will say, "Open time pickup is in the UPA, and that's my right," and "I've got bills to pay, yadah yadah yadah."
It sounds like you are a management wet dream (just take a look at their openers) or just a flying ***** who would fly till they die if it weren't for FAR preventing them from doing so.
It sounds like you finally got to the seat where you wanna be for the rest of your career, or are at least content with it, so manpower negative policies won't have a large effect on you.
Sorry, but no thanks. Some people who have been stagnant for 5-15 years would still like to be able to bid CA before they are 55 years old.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post