Search
Notices

Contract 2019

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2018, 09:43 AM
  #111  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by catIIIc View Post
Exactly we are paid industry rates for the 767-300 what would you like to give up to pay for this luxury. And with the 787’s coming to EWR even more opportunity to bid off the 767.
Why on earth did we settle for this in the first place? Guess CAL did something right for once paying out the 767-200's at a widebody rate defying the rest of the "industry".
757Driver is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 10:41 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: B777 FO
Posts: 240
Default

They could do that because the rest of our contract was a joke, zero work rules, dh over to Europe to work it back, 50% dh, although that was temporary,rest seat in coach, just to name a few. Yes maybe we defied the industry standard on 767-200 rates(for 12 airplanes) but the rest of the contract was well below industry standard

Last edited by catIIIc; 06-21-2018 at 11:02 AM.
catIIIc is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 12:31 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive View Post
You were not lied to. 21 of the 35 UA 763's are 25 years or older which is the planned retirement age for mainline jets. The decision to extend their lives was made based on recent circumstances. UA 763s are paid comparably to DAL and AAL, and the 16 764 that are about 17 years old pay the same as 777s.

It has also been almost six years since the contract was signed. You have had ample opportunity to escape the injustice that is the 763.

The plane weighs almost three times more than a 737-800, can fly twice as far, carries more people and a lot more cargo, yet only pays $10 more per hour. Who cares what DAL and AMR pay for theirs. For everyone who escapes it's "injustice", someone else has to fly it.
Floyd is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 12:49 PM
  #114  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by catIIIc View Post
They could do that because the rest of our contract was a joke, zero work rules, dh over to Europe to work it back, 50% dh, although that was temporary,rest seat in coach, just to name a few. Yes maybe we defied the industry standard on 767-200 rates(for 12 airplanes) but the rest of the contract was well below industry standard
Can't argue with that but when we finally did come together, we were supposedly taking the best from each others contracts. As we went with the previous CAL category pay, the 767-300 should have spilled over into the same category that the much smaller 767-200 did. I've got to agree with Baseball as both NC Committee's did sell the fix as unnecessary due to the 767-300's upcoming rapid departure from the fleet. Utter nonsense that nobody should have listened to but it was out there and discussed extensively and probably affected some of our yes voters.
757Driver is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 01:32 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

If I remember correctly the CAL contract had the 767-400 at the same pay as 777? The UAL contract had 757 & 767 grouped together at a higher rate that A320 and 727, but less than 777. The historical idea seemed to be pay the two together at a higher rate and more pilots will benefit than having 767 higher and 757 lower.

Also UAL was the kick-off customer in 1981/82 for the first 767. I think it was sold contractually as a size between narrow and wide body, 727/DC8 and DC10/747. We also had multiple pay rates for sizes based on GW; 3 727 rates, multiple DC8, DC10-10, -30, 747... it got a bit confusing, but in it all we never had a pay check screw-up.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 02:06 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,199
Default

If we just replace all the 767’s with 787/A330 this conversation becomes a moot point.

MAKEUNITEDGREATAGAIN
Grumble is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 02:15 PM
  #117  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Um...
Can we get back to Fussball talk?!
Some interesting games so far. Lot's of upsets and sleeper teams.
Getting interesting as the 2nd set of games get going!

Motch~
horrido27 is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 02:19 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,688
Default

Originally Posted by grumble View Post
if we just replace all the 767’s with 787/a330 this conversation becomes a moot point.

Makeunitedgreatagain
muga, fupm 2019
John Carr is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 02:52 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,199
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27 View Post
Um...
Can we get back to Fussball talk?!
Some interesting games so far. Lot's of upsets and sleeper teams.
Getting interesting as the 2nd set of games get going!

Motch~
If you want to talk soccer, may I suggest Grinder?
Grumble is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 03:14 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27 View Post
Um...
Can we get back to Fussball talk?!
Some interesting games so far. Lot's of upsets and sleeper teams.
Getting interesting as the 2nd set of games get going!

Motch~



Brazil 2018 World Cup champs
Sniper66 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Rascal
JetBlue
20
01-25-2018 01:54 PM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices