Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Percentage of flying done by regionals. >

Percentage of flying done by regionals.

Search
Notices

Percentage of flying done by regionals.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2018, 05:10 PM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
49er's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 36
Default

Originally Posted by keepinitreal View Post
YAAAAAAAAAWWWWWN!!! Of course miles are going to be heavily skewed towards mainline pilots. lol

Number of passengers per pilot per month is a different story. Sure, mainline carries more passengers per trip, but the RJ pilot does many more trips many more days per month.
I hope you are more through and well spoken in the flight deck than you are here.

For the love of God, take some pride in the validity of your posts. You have brought nothing meaningful to this conversation. Nothing researched, nothing thought out... It’s like reading a response from a petulant 15 year old. The capitalized ‘yawn’ the misplaced use of ‘lol’... no one here takes you seriously.

After having read your posts here, you probably deserve to be stuck in the minor leagues like you are. Now isn’t there a guard frequency somewhere you should be meowing on?

Also... stop trying to compare our jobs. In some ways they are the same, but in many ways there are very different. I fly hundreds of people, thousands of miles on a single flight. I cross the North Pole, hostile countries, monsoons, and vast oceans in the black of night; all while you sleep in your bed. I have to deal with geopolitical issues, language barriers, overflight permits, diversion airfields that might not have fuel, metric flight levels, the ITCZ, radio blackouts from solar storms, being 3 hours away from a nearest airfield when an engine fails... there is no valid comparison for you to make. A single flight on my aircraft represents over a million dollars in revenue and billions of dollars in liabilities. You and I are very different pilots I’d venture to guess.
49er is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 05:24 PM
  #42  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 46
Default

Originally Posted by Guppies4Dayz View Post
I seriously doubt you’re doing 12 round trip TLV trips a month. �� Math in public, don’t do it. Your haul is more like 265 x 1 x 12 = 3250 pax per month.

But you’re right, this is a completely meaningless statistic in every sense. We might as well try to tally up how many crew meals we consume per month and try to say that has some kind of metric on who does more work for the company, or measure the number of steps the FO has to take on the walk around per month or some other nonsense like that. The metrics that matter are the ones Wall Street pays attention to.
Of course sunvex over inflated his numbers to his favor. That is what happens when one tries to pull numbers out of one's !@#.!
keepinitreal is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 05:25 PM
  #43  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 46
Default

Originally Posted by 49er View Post
I hope you are more through and well spoken in the flight deck than you are here.

For the love of God, take some pride in the validity of your posts. You have brought nothing meaningful to this conversation. Nothing researched, nothing thought out... It’s like reading a response from a petulant 15 year old. The capitalized ‘yawn’ the misplaced use of ‘lol’... no one here takes you seriously.

After having read your posts here, you probably deserve to be stuck in the minor leagues like you are. Now isn’t there a guard frequency somewhere you should be meowing on?

Also... stop trying to compare our jobs. In some ways they are the same, but in many ways there are very different. I fly hundreds of people, thousands of miles on a single flight. I cross the North Pole, hostile countries, monsoons, and vast oceans in the black of night; all while you sleep in your bed. I have to deal with geopolitical issues, language barriers, overflight permits, diversion airfields that might not have fuel, metric flight levels, the ITCZ, radio blackouts from solar storms, being 3 hours away from a nearest airfield when an engine fails... there is no valid comparison for you to make. A single flight on my aircraft represents over a million dollars in revenue and billions of dollars in liabilities. You and I are very different pilots I’d venture to guess.
That is very special. Brought a tear to my eye actually. That is a lot you have to think about on your two flights a month.
keepinitreal is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 05:35 PM
  #44  
Line Holder
 
49er's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 36
Default

Originally Posted by keepinitreal View Post
That is very special. Brought a tear to my eye actually. That is a lot you have to think about on your two flights a month.
Go to bed troll, it’s getting late... past your bedtime.
49er is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 05:44 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bigfatdaddy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 862
Default

Originally Posted by 49er View Post
Go to bed troll, it’s getting late... past your bedtime.
Yep.....for sure
bigfatdaddy is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 06:28 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 292
Default

Originally Posted by keepinitreal View Post
That is very special. Brought a tear to my eye actually. That is a lot you have to think about on your two flights a month.
He has a point that International flying takes more consideration, and you have a point we don't do it as often as a domestic pilot.

I think Narrow body pilots and RJ Captains should be paid more than what they get now.
Glenntilton is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 06:40 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by keepinitreal View Post
Of course sunvex over inflated his numbers to his favor. That is what happens when one tries to pull numbers out of one's !@#.!
Sunvox did seats X legs X days worked. The 12 represents days worked. The 1 represents the legs each day. Very 777 like, especially with all the domestic flying on it now.

Doesn’t seem overinflated at all. Where are your statistics to refute his overall argument?
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 07:09 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Do some people actually believe that pay rates are a reflection of what a pilot, in cosmic justice, deserves?
Airlines pay what they must, to get who they need, to do what they require. That’s it.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 09:21 PM
  #49  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by Photoflier View Post
The lost decade was caused by 9/11, a tanking economy, and age 65.

The scope relief that put CRJ1998’s Dad on the street was thanks to the 1113c process. He acts like it was some big money grab by the “greedy” United Pilots. This is the way the 1113c works. The company says “you’re going to bend over and take a monster paycut, relax scope, and destroy your retirement. And you’re going to LIKE it”. The pilots than have 2 choices: hold your nose and accept it, or let a judge decide. The same judge that had rubber stamped EVERY SINGLE request UAL had brought to the court. UAL’s finances were such that they had about 3 days of operating capital at one point. What they asked for, they got. Simply for survival thanks to the denial of the ATSB loan (twice). UAL couldn’t raise any capital at that point.

So was it a smart move by the pilots to accept the contract? I don’t know, but I’m pretty confident the scope we would have ended up with would have been what was on management’s emergency 1113c term sheet had we taken our chances with the judge: NO scope. CRJ1998’s Dad might not have liked it, and I don’t blame him. But we lived on to fight another day and he now has a pretty strong airline with a decent contract to come back to.

THAT’s the fact.
There was no 1113c bankruptcy process in 1996-1997 when the barn door was first opened on scope. Yes it was a long time ago, but I saw the consequences when my dad and uncle being put on the street when the music stopped after 9/11. And yes I was in middle school, but I was old enough to understand the trouble that my family was in.
CRJ1988 is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 09:43 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by CRJ1988 View Post
There was no 1113c bankruptcy process in 1996-1997 when the barn door was first opened on scope. Yes it was a long time ago, but I saw the consequences when my dad and uncle being put on the street when the music stopped after 9/11. And yes I was in middle school, but I was old enough to understand the trouble that my family was in.
Barn door is it now? You're pretty fuzzy on details, have you ever actually read the UAL RJ exception letter? Wanna educate us all on the history of the BAC-111, F-28, BAe-146 and the dynamics within the industry in '95 that brought that exception letter to UAL pilots? Do you remember if any other airlines were operating RJ's?

As for the 1113c process, that law absolutely pre-dates 1995. But more to the point is do you understand what it is, and how the company used the threat of a judge rejecting an entire mature CBA to extract more concessions on RJ flying in BK?

I'd argue RJ scope was adequate in 1998, but the real damage was done in 2003 in BK, and that decision didn't go out to the membership.

For kids to jump in this thread a try to rewrite history for those of us who lived it just makes you look stupid. It sucked for sure, but one thing I know for sure is I don't owe you squat.

Last edited by awax; 09-21-2018 at 09:54 PM.
awax is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BMEP100
United
31
07-22-2014 07:50 AM
CaptainTeezy
Major
92
11-23-2009 03:30 PM
dd89
Flight Schools and Training
34
08-23-2009 11:08 AM
Flyboydan
Major
32
07-14-2008 02:14 AM
DMBinHBurg
Regional
33
11-12-2006 11:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices