Reserve idea
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
If the reserve guarantees were higher than the lower built lines, then they would go more senior (in theory) than a junior lineholder. This makes previous junior reserve guys happy since now they are junior lineholders instead of commuting to reserve.
Previous junior lineholders now get a higher value paycheck in exchange for being on reserve, or if reserve goes even higher than junior lineholder, than previous junior lineholder becomes mid level lineholder.
The only people that I could see that wouldn’t benefit from this are the most senior widebody Captains. Most pilots here at United will never be a widebody CA.
Previous junior lineholders now get a higher value paycheck in exchange for being on reserve, or if reserve goes even higher than junior lineholder, than previous junior lineholder becomes mid level lineholder.
The only people that I could see that wouldn’t benefit from this are the most senior widebody Captains. Most pilots here at United will never be a widebody CA.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 640
Reserve guarantee is paid higher then lineholder guarantee (73 vs 70)
In slow months a reserve can make more then a lineholder. Case in point this month for me as a senior lineholder. My PBS award is 70:36. Nothing works for Trip trading (either the trips pay less or days don’t work for what I need off) so I’m stuck with my original schedule.
C’est la vie.
Back in the way past (Contract 2000) Reserve and Lineholder guarantee both were 75 hours (77 in a flex month). Lineholder schedules were built to a max of 81 (83 in a flex month). The most a lineholder could make in a month was 85 hours due to any excess going into the bank (which would fill your pay for ensuing months towards that 85 hour Cap)
Bankruptcy sucked a lot of that away, especially for the narrow bodies. Went from 12/13 days off to 10 with 2 moveable. Guarantees dropped as well.
But even post bankruptcy they still built FSB lines (bid on monthly) that paid 90 hours. Those lines went SENIOR. The company can still advertise and build monthly FSB lines under our current contract but has chosen not to.
There are certainly areas in which to improve upon the reserve system but there are also areas the company wants to improve from their perspective (early reports on day 1 ring a bell?). So be careful what you wish for because it may get worse in a different way.
In slow months a reserve can make more then a lineholder. Case in point this month for me as a senior lineholder. My PBS award is 70:36. Nothing works for Trip trading (either the trips pay less or days don’t work for what I need off) so I’m stuck with my original schedule.
C’est la vie.
Back in the way past (Contract 2000) Reserve and Lineholder guarantee both were 75 hours (77 in a flex month). Lineholder schedules were built to a max of 81 (83 in a flex month). The most a lineholder could make in a month was 85 hours due to any excess going into the bank (which would fill your pay for ensuing months towards that 85 hour Cap)
Bankruptcy sucked a lot of that away, especially for the narrow bodies. Went from 12/13 days off to 10 with 2 moveable. Guarantees dropped as well.
But even post bankruptcy they still built FSB lines (bid on monthly) that paid 90 hours. Those lines went SENIOR. The company can still advertise and build monthly FSB lines under our current contract but has chosen not to.
There are certainly areas in which to improve upon the reserve system but there are also areas the company wants to improve from their perspective (early reports on day 1 ring a bell?). So be careful what you wish for because it may get worse in a different way.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 491
Do whatever you want with reserve. People will always complain about how lousy it is, and then as soon as they can hold a line, will put in a bid to the next highest pay band and then complain about how lousy reserve is!
#15
I'll not waste my time detailing the differences as I've already done it a half a dozen times in the last 6 or 7 years. A simple search ought to display the numerous threads.
#16
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 28
There are some very simple changes that need to take place that would make reserve life way more tolerable.
1) make it so there is no 6 day silo. If you are good for 6 days you are still in the 5 day silo so you can aggressive pick up a 4 day trip on day 1 instead of being forced to get assigned SC or FSB.
2) NO freebie SC or FSB conversions. Either that or after the 2nd unused assignment, each conversion pays 2 hours add pay. Something of that nature.
3) make it so scheduling can’t target people (and circumvent seniority) by choosing the silo that each SC or FSB assignment gets. There have been numerous times I wanted a certain assignment but couldn’t get it because it wasn’t silo/silo-1 and someone junior got it who may not have even wanted it.
Just these changes alone would make reserve infinitely more palatable.
1) make it so there is no 6 day silo. If you are good for 6 days you are still in the 5 day silo so you can aggressive pick up a 4 day trip on day 1 instead of being forced to get assigned SC or FSB.
2) NO freebie SC or FSB conversions. Either that or after the 2nd unused assignment, each conversion pays 2 hours add pay. Something of that nature.
3) make it so scheduling can’t target people (and circumvent seniority) by choosing the silo that each SC or FSB assignment gets. There have been numerous times I wanted a certain assignment but couldn’t get it because it wasn’t silo/silo-1 and someone junior got it who may not have even wanted it.
Just these changes alone would make reserve infinitely more palatable.
#17
3) make it so scheduling can’t target people (and circumvent seniority) by choosing the silo that each SC or FSB assignment gets. There have been numerous times I wanted a certain assignment but couldn’t get it because it wasn’t silo/silo-1 and someone junior got it who may not have even wanted it.
#18
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Maybe reserve pay could float month to month. When PBS bidding opens it could show what the pay guarantee is for that month based on some calculation of what the lineholder lines are worth (average, low, or some other number). Seeing that number a lineholder could choose to bid reserve or not that month, providing some flexibility for all.
What we understand UAL has that we want is if you are called and put on short call for a day, you all get +1 hr added in pay to your guarantee. All Delta gets is 1hr credit towards the month so when you get to ALV you are considered "full" and can't be used any more, so if on a fleet where reserve usage is low, the 1hr credit doesn't mean much.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
1. It would cost the company more money.
Why would they incentivize people to do something they are already doing for free (because they have no other choice).
Airlines are businesses and have little if any interest in improving pilot QOL. Just dollars and cents.
#20
And that is why we are members of a union. Just dollars, cents, and QOL for PILOTS.
2017-
UAL reported full-year net income of $2.1 billion, diluted earnings per share of $7.02, pre-tax earnings of $3.0 billion and pre-tax margin of 7.9 percent. Excluding special charges and income tax adjustments, UAL reported full-year net income of $2.1 billion, diluted earnings per share of $6.76, pre-tax earnings of $3.2 billion and pre-tax margin of 8.4 percent.
2016-
UAL reported full-year net income of $2.3 billion, diluted earnings per share of $6.85, pre-tax earnings of $3.8 billion and pre-tax margin of 10.4 percent. Excluding special items, UAL reported full-year net income of $2.9 billion, diluted earnings per share of $8.65, pre-tax earnings of $4.5 billion and pre-tax margin of 12.2 percent.
2015-
UAL reported full-year net income of $4.5 billion, or $11.88 per diluted share, excluding special items. Including special items, UAL reported full-year net income of $7.3 billion. These results include a nonrecurring $3.1 billion non-cash benefit associated with the reversal of the company's income tax valuation allowance.
Are you an ALPA member?
For your reading enjoyment (cough) and edification. Please take a gander...
http://www.chicagotribune.com/busine...422-story.html
Last edited by oldmako; 10-07-2018 at 06:26 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post