Vacancy 19-04
11-02-2018, 07:05 PM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 491
Originally Posted by PA Slammer
Where did they say that? Not doubting, just curious where.
The goal of this bid is to fill the remaining open training slots in January. Looking ahead, I expect the next vacancy to occur in December, and I expect it will be larger than the current vacancy.
Also, the SSC update said we are limited by how much training capacity we have, so expect that these bids will keep coming for some time.
11-02-2018, 07:06 PM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,609
Originally Posted by PA Slammer
Where did they say that? Not doubting, just curious where.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
11-03-2018, 07:26 AM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: It's still a Guppy, just a bit longer.
Posts: 727
Originally Posted by BMEP100
No Houston W/B ca. vacancies. Continued Houston shrinkage.
And they wonder why the Houston Fltops pulse numbers are so low.
And they wonder why the Houston Fltops pulse numbers are so low.
11-03-2018, 07:39 AM
#16
Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 7
Originally Posted by Airway
I think Houston is an important market, but I'm pretty sure the decisions are not personal to "screw" Houston crews.
Being in a union is supposed to ensure all are treated the same. Maybe it is time to have a discussion on language to force staffing some of the costal growth with the flyover mid-continent pilots.
11-03-2018, 07:44 AM
#17
Line Holder
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Pilot ;)
Posts: 91
Originally Posted by RatherBeVFR
Being in a union is supposed to ensure all are treated the same. Maybe it is time to have a discussion on language to force staffing some of the costal growth with the flyover mid-continent pilots.
That’s insane
And it’s stupid expensive to do that. Like your profit sharing?!
Everybody has the opportunity to bid SFO or EWR. Everybody has the opportunity to move to those locations too.
And we are all treated the same.
11-03-2018, 08:00 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 611
Originally Posted by RatherBeVFR
I think most of us realize that. However, the difference between the have and have not groups is huge. Almost 19 years (LUA) doesn’t hold captain in ORD. Worse in DEN and IAH.
Being in a union is supposed to ensure all are treated the same. Maybe it is time to have a discussion on language to force staffing some of the costal growth with the flyover mid-continent pilots.
Being in a union is supposed to ensure all are treated the same. Maybe it is time to have a discussion on language to force staffing some of the costal growth with the flyover mid-continent pilots.
11-03-2018, 08:01 AM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 694
Dude pass the pipe! Gotta say, GUM has been getting screwed out of the widebody stuff in particular... I demand a 787 base there - union should treat us all the same and force some equitable staffing.
Originally Posted by RatherBeVFR
I think most of us realize that. However, the difference between the have and have not groups is huge. Almost 19 years (LUA) doesn’t hold captain in ORD. Worse in DEN and IAH.
Being in a union is supposed to ensure all are treated the same. Maybe it is time to have a discussion on language to force staffing some of the costal growth with the flyover mid-continent pilots.
Being in a union is supposed to ensure all are treated the same. Maybe it is time to have a discussion on language to force staffing some of the costal growth with the flyover mid-continent pilots.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
