Search
Notices

Crj 550

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2019, 09:54 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ni hao's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Gear *****
Posts: 266
Default

This is without a doubt SK with two fingers up at our MEC. SK has not changed his playbook for 20 years. On the plus side we now know the plan. They should not be stuck on scope anymore. A new UPA by this summer
Ni hao is offline  
Old 02-09-2019, 10:08 AM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 119
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100 View Post
From what I’ve read on the Gojet forum, no agreement has been reached with their pilots as to pay rates. My understanding is their rates are based on number of seats. That will be interesting, watching Go convince their pilots to accept 50 seat pay for a 70 seat.....

Apparently, the rate UA will pay has already been agreed.

Go has a problem with pilot retentions and sounds like pilot relations are already strained.
https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/gojet/117001-gojet-loses-another-federal-employment-case.html
RoyerYetlink is offline  
Old 02-09-2019, 10:15 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27 View Post
If a 50 seater is used to open new markets..
And then they upgrade to a 70/76 seater..
Till they start adding a mix of 70/76 seaters and 50 seaters.
Is there any such thing as a new market? I think all of the data should be out there as far as where the airports are, where the people live, and where folks wanna go.

It should be pretty simple for the marketing folks. I really don't think there are any "new" markets..... Likely some unserved for a reason, and some under served for a reason.
baseball is offline  
Old 02-09-2019, 10:20 AM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27 View Post
The fact that we have NO 100 seater is killing us.. slowly.

I also find it (sadly) humorous that it will be staffed by a single flight attendant but still have a first and a premium economy class.
Service?!
It is my theory that we are subsidizing Kirby's silly thought process and economic plans.

Don't run the APU! Result: we save money, and then we have the money to burn on the lack of a 100 seat airplane.

Reduce staffing on the FA side! Result: we save money, and then we have the money to burn by buying a 70 seat jet and flying it with 50 people.

I see how this works.....We rob peter and then pay paul. We just do it internally. Rob one department and pay another. The balance sheets don't care as long as the final balance sheet is squared away.
baseball is offline  
Old 02-09-2019, 11:20 AM
  #125  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: CA
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
It is my theory that we are subsidizing Kirby's silly thought process and economic plans.

Don't run the APU! Result: we save money, and then we have the money to burn on the lack of a 100 seat airplane.

Reduce staffing on the FA side! Result: we save money, and then we have the money to burn by buying a 70 seat jet and flying it with 50 people.

I see how this works.....We rob peter and then pay paul. We just do it internally. Rob one department and pay another. The balance sheets don't care as long as the final balance sheet is squared away.
We are trying to fill planes and connect to mainline with the high yield passengers, it’s our union blocking the company from selling more seats. Our scope love it or not ultimately affects our profitability. I’m not advocating selling out, but I do know out of a lot of cities we have lost global service and higher paying customers do to our inferior 50 seat product. That’s life. I personally would be fine with replacing more 50 seaters with 70 seats at the regional level. I think we are cutting our own necks. The same guys that beeyatch about DAL profit sharing don’t seem open minded to any changes that might increase our profitability. Yes single engine taxi helps and when even employees like myself BUY tickets for their families rather then use the UAL discount because you have to travel on a crap 50 seat RJ THERE IS AN ISSUE. I hope our union knows what it’s doing
Zenofzin is offline  
Old 02-09-2019, 11:34 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by Zenofzin View Post
Our scope love it or not ultimately affects our profitability...I personally would be fine with replacing more 50 seaters with 70 seats at the regional level. I think we are cutting our own necks. The same guys that beeyatch about DAL profit sharing don’t seem open minded to any changes that might increase our profitability....I hope our union knows what it’s doing
The UPA RJ scope clause is essentially the same as Delta's. It is United management who doesn't want to compete on that basis. Thankfully our union is holding the line. Some pilots never learn.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 02-09-2019, 12:17 PM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive View Post
The UPA RJ scope clause is essentially the same as Delta's. It is United management who doesn't want to compete on that basis. Thankfully our union is holding the line. Some pilots never learn.
^^^
This

Sometimes I’m amazed that pilots are our own worst enemy. But mostly, I’m not.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 02-09-2019, 01:37 PM
  #128  
Not at work
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 737 ca
Posts: 293
Default

Originally Posted by Zenofzin View Post
We are trying to fill planes and connect to mainline with the high yield passengers, it’s our union blocking the company from selling more seats. Our scope love it or not ultimately affects our profitability. I’m not advocating selling out, but I do know out of a lot of cities we have lost global service and higher paying customers do to our inferior 50 seat product. That’s life. I personally would be fine with replacing more 50 seaters with 70 seats at the regional level. I think we are cutting our own necks. The same guys that beeyatch about DAL profit sharing don’t seem open minded to any changes that might increase our profitability. Yes single engine taxi helps and when even employees like myself BUY tickets for their families rather then use the UAL discount because you have to travel on a crap 50 seat RJ THERE IS AN ISSUE. I hope our union knows what it’s doing
And you know that pesky code share and joint venture scope is severely limiting our company’s ability to turn a larger profit too.. I mean Delta
blockplus is offline  
Old 02-09-2019, 02:22 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flightmedic01's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Reclining
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by Zenofzin View Post
We are trying to fill planes and connect to mainline with the high yield passengers, it’s our union blocking the company from selling more seats. Our scope love it or not ultimately affects our profitability. I’m not advocating selling out, but I do know out of a lot of cities we have lost global service and higher paying customers do to our inferior 50 seat product. That’s life. I personally would be fine with replacing more 50 seaters with 70 seats at the regional level. I think we are cutting our own necks. The same guys that beeyatch about DAL profit sharing don’t seem open minded to any changes that might increase our profitability. Yes single engine taxi helps and when even employees like myself BUY tickets for their families rather then use the UAL discount because you have to travel on a crap 50 seat RJ THERE IS AN ISSUE. I hope our union knows what it’s doing
UAL can add as many 70/76 seaters as they want. They just have to be flown by UAL pilots and not outsourced to some fly-by-night outfit like GoatJets. And this CRJ-550 is still gonna be an inferior product. One overworked and underpaid FA, 10 "premium" seats and 40 economy seats, self-serve vending machine (or whatever its gonna be) and stacking your rollaboards in a closet like a giant game of Jenga. Yeah, what possibly could go wrong?!?
flightmedic01 is offline  
Old 02-09-2019, 07:30 PM
  #130  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: CA
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive View Post
The UPA RJ scope clause is essentially the same as Delta's. It is United management who doesn't want to compete on that basis. Thankfully our union is holding the line. Some pilots never learn.
Lol we hold the line and lose profitabile customers. Good call.
Zenofzin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRM1337
Regional
14
09-03-2015 11:19 AM
Cubdriver
Hiring News
1
01-31-2013 07:07 AM
Tuckster
Flight Schools and Training
6
06-29-2008 07:22 AM
saab2000
Regional
46
11-27-2007 02:35 PM
JAGflyer
Regional
11
09-07-2007 06:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices