![]() |
Originally Posted by Zenofzin
(Post 2760876)
Lol we hold the line and lose profitabile customers. Good call.
|
Originally Posted by Zenofzin
(Post 2760656)
I personally would be fine with replacing more 50 seaters with 70 seats at the regional level.
|
Originally Posted by Zenofzin
(Post 2760876)
Lol we hold the line and lose profitabile customers. Good call.
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 |
Originally Posted by Zenofzin
(Post 2760876)
Lol we hold the line and lose profitabile customers. Good call.
If UA flies profitable customers on large RJs to hubs where they connect to other large RJs or JV flights, who is the "we"? (Rhetorical question.) Since the UAL and DAL contact language is virtually identical, it sure would be great to figure out DAL's secret method of unlocking additional large RJs for those profitable customers. I wonder if they will tell us if we ask nicely? And while we are at it, maybe we can figure out a plan to fill the gap between 76 and 130 seat airplanes. I bet there's a bunch of profitable customers in markets too small for RJs. But, alas, we'll never really know will we? Those DAL guys are really sharp and I doubt they'll spill the beans. |
Originally Posted by Zenofzin
(Post 2760876)
Lol we hold the line and lose profitabile customers. Good call.
|
Originally Posted by Zenofzin
(Post 2760876)
Lol we hold the line and lose profitabile customers. Good call.
The ball is in their court. ;) |
Originally Posted by EELightning
(Post 2760597)
Good point. 200 with 50 pax (and associated ballast), fuel for 600nm @ M.72 FL330 2400 pph.
700 with 70 pax, fuel for 600nm @ M.78 FL370 3400pph. Remove 20 pax and 20 seats and 1 FA. Add a couple closets, coke machine, upgrade 4 seats. Probably = 5000 lbs lower cruise weight, fuel burn drops to 3300 pph. Climb to F390 save another 100pph. |
Originally Posted by Zenofzin
(Post 2760876)
Lol we hold the line and lose profitabile customers. Good call.
I assume you are on the top 10 percent seniority and never been on the street I hope all 3 hold the scope as tight as they can. Wrong statement to say the least from your part |
I like this kind of thread drift. Many thanks, Gents!
https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/65672192.jpg Probably Strother Martins best role. While brief, I liked him here as well... https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mVUrWv4CPSE/hqdefault.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DiZyWGWUEAATpP7.jpg |
Originally Posted by Zenofzin
(Post 2760656)
We are trying to fill planes and connect to mainline with the high yield passengers, it’s our union blocking the company from selling more seats.
Actually, it's our union protecting YOUR job. Fixed it for you. ;) . [/QUOTE}.....because you have to travel on a crap 50 seat RJ THERE IS AN ISSUE. I hope our union knows what it’s doing You have to travel on a crap 50 seat RJ because in the past our union didn't do enough to protect our jobs. Too late for me, but not too late for the young bucks wandering the halls these days sporting a halfwing. I say, better late than never. Willis already has enough money to spit polish the operation. They just want more RJ drivers and fewer of us. What's past is prologue. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:31 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands