737 max update...
01-22-2020 | 09:12 AM
#92
Banned
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
01-22-2020 | 09:47 AM
#93
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: 756 Left Side
Guess ALL our fleets will be busy.
Talk about having to reshuffle~
Then again, probably means the widebodies will get some more domestic stuff which should mean pay opportunity for some.. who choose to fly at 100% PPU!
FS, FP & FtC
Motch
Talk about having to reshuffle~
Then again, probably means the widebodies will get some more domestic stuff which should mean pay opportunity for some.. who choose to fly at 100% PPU!
FS, FP & FtC
Motch
01-22-2020 | 11:14 AM
#95
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Saw that too...
And an article about the fact that Boeing hasn't filed the WARN paperwork so they are not planing furloughs.. YET.
But Spirit Aerospace has, and they say there are numerous smaller companies that will have to lay off too.
What a mess.
FS, FP & FtC
Motch
And an article about the fact that Boeing hasn't filed the WARN paperwork so they are not planing furloughs.. YET.
But Spirit Aerospace has, and they say there are numerous smaller companies that will have to lay off too.
What a mess.
FS, FP & FtC
Motch
Screw the middle class worker bees - former CEO walked away with 70 million. We should be happy for him. Glad that one of his fellow cronies has now taken over Boeing, while insisting that he doesn’t need to do anything to reassure the public that the MAX will someday be safe to fly. Who cares if it flies, as long as the shareholders keep getting their dividends and the executives still get their golden parachutes.
What a crock of ****.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
01-22-2020 | 12:51 PM
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 1
Screw the middle class worker bees - former CEO walked away with 70 million. We should be happy for him. Glad that one of his fellow cronies has now taken over Boeing, while insisting that he doesn’t need to do anything to reassure the public that the MAX will someday be safe to fly. Who cares if it flies, as long as the shareholders keep getting their dividends and the executives still get their golden parachutes.
What a crock of ****.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
What a crock of ****.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Careful...The thought police might sensor and edit you, or delete your post. I've seen posts deleted for less.
01-22-2020 | 04:45 PM
#98
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: 756 Left Side
LOL
I just got a bad boy email on the other forum about me writing "Fly the Contract"
LOL
Pretty sad when that is enough to get you censored/banned.
Oh well. Thick headed German/Enlisted guy who doesn't know how to behave!
Probably get banned from this forum at some point too!
HAHAHAHA
But till then-
Fly Safe, Fly Professionally and Fly the Contract
always
Motch
I just got a bad boy email on the other forum about me writing "Fly the Contract"
LOL
Pretty sad when that is enough to get you censored/banned.
Oh well. Thick headed German/Enlisted guy who doesn't know how to behave!
Probably get banned from this forum at some point too!
HAHAHAHA
But till then-
Fly Safe, Fly Professionally and Fly the Contract
always
Motch
01-23-2020 | 01:22 AM
#99
Banned
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Sort of....but if the 737 pilots (union) were going to sue BA they are going to have to show how they were harmed and others didn't (including the company) profit from the restriction of excess capacity into the domestic system and/or additional usage of other fleets......at least if I were a BA lawyer, that's what I'd argue.
01-23-2020 | 10:24 AM
#100
Moderate Moderator
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
