Search

Notices

Trans States Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2020 | 10:06 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
XJT ALPA just signed a new contract with substantial pay increases, including protections for TSA pilots. What a nice gesture by UA to increase XJT pay in this current environment. This is great news for both pilot groups!
And apparently United has pulled the plug on that deal according to the threads in the Expressjet forum. Probably similar to how they blocked Republic’s acquisition of TSH two years ago.
Reply
Old 03-06-2020 | 10:13 AM
  #32  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by Tpinks
And apparently United has pulled the plug on that deal according to the threads in the Expressjet forum. Probably similar to how they blocked Republic’s acquisition of TSH two years ago.
UAL has its own issues at the moment.
Reply
Old 03-08-2020 | 09:07 PM
  #33  
New Hire
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Floridaflipper
Not to be a dick, and I can empathize with the TSA pilot's situation, but these were aircraft that were taken from XJT a few years ago. XJT has lost over 70 XR aircraft to TSA and CommutAir over the last 5 years or so. The TSA aircraft are simply coming back to XJT. In exchange, they are losing 175s to SkyWest.

The reason that XJT can't staff what they have is because of the screw job that SkyWest put them through over the last 10 years. The aircraft slowly got whittled away and many senior people, who probably would have made a career at XJT, had no reason to believe there was a future, so they left. Many FOs jumped at the first opportunity to leave - some going to TSA and CommutAir for the quick upgrade.

XJT is hiring street CAs - I'm pretty sure most TSA guys will be OK.
Point of order - TSA was set to get a new United contract back in 09/10ish. Sent out recall letters to our furloughed pilots. My understanding is XJT undercut the bid at the last minute and offered to use the aircraft from their recently mothballed self branded airline and fly at a loss - thereby saving more money than simply parking those aircraft. When that contract ended and XJT/SkyWest no longer wanted to fly for a loss - the contract was awarded to TSA. Also prior to this point XJT had never had an United contract (Continental of course but not United) whereas TSA had an established relationship with United. So from my point of view XJT “stole” the flying in the first place that TSA is now being accused of “stealing”.

My personal feeling is that there is no TSA or XJT or Republic flying - it is all United flying and we can’t bicker between ourselves when United bids us against each other looking for the cheapest operator.
#InUnity

Last edited by OnTimeEveryTime; 03-08-2020 at 09:28 PM.
Reply
Old 03-09-2020 | 09:53 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by OnTimeEveryTime
Point of order - TSA was set to get a new United contract back in 09/10ish. Sent out recall letters to our furloughed pilots. My understanding is XJT undercut the bid at the last minute and offered to use the aircraft from their recently mothballed self branded airline and fly at a loss - thereby saving more money than simply parking those aircraft. When that contract ended and XJT/SkyWest no longer wanted to fly for a loss - the contract was awarded to TSA. Also prior to this point XJT had never had an United contract (Continental of course but not United) whereas TSA had an established relationship with United. So from my point of view XJT “stole” the flying in the first place that TSA is now being accused of “stealing”.



My personal feeling is that there is no TSA or XJT or Republic flying - it is all United flying and we can’t bicker between ourselves when United bids us against each other looking for the cheapest operator.

#InUnity

Point of order: Continental paid Skywest to do due diligence in order for Skywest to provide an offer to buy XJT. Skywest was able to look at XJT’s books. In order to proved Skywest more leverage, Continental exercised a clause in the CPA with XJT and gave notice to XJT they were giving them the 12 month notice of winding down XJT and a complete transfer of all 244 aircraft to Skywest or alternatively provide Continental the same deal Skywest was offering. Once Skywest did their due diligence, they offered to buy XJT but they put contingencies in the offer which included the pilots taking a 16% pay cut and not to get rid of the contract section that would’ve forced a seniority list merger of XJT/Asa/skywest. The pilots negotiated with Skywest but were unable to come to an agreement. Instead of winding down, XJT signed the CPA Skywest negotiate with Continental (which had the 16% concession assumptions built in) and so the losses under the CPA started. With the 30 xjt branded 145s, xjt was able to enter into an agreement with United. Shortly thereafter, the UAL/CAL merger was announced. In other words, it was all pre-planned by CAL/UAL.

Many years later, United decided to transfer the 145s XJT was operating to TSA and CMT. If there are any non-xjt 145XRs operating, they were ALL originally XJT operated since they were the only operator who ever flew them until they were transferred away.
Reply
Old 03-09-2020 | 01:49 PM
  #35  
New Hire
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX
Point of order: Continental paid Skywest to do due diligence in order for Skywest to provide an offer to buy XJT. Skywest was able to look at XJT’s books. In order to proved Skywest more leverage, Continental exercised a clause in the CPA with XJT and gave notice to XJT they were giving them the 12 month notice of winding down XJT and a complete transfer of all 244 aircraft to Skywest or alternatively provide Continental the same deal Skywest was offering. Once Skywest did their due diligence, they offered to buy XJT but they put contingencies in the offer which included the pilots taking a 16% pay cut and not to get rid of the contract section that would’ve forced a seniority list merger of XJT/Asa/skywest. The pilots negotiated with Skywest but were unable to come to an agreement. Instead of winding down, XJT signed the CPA Skywest negotiate with Continental (which had the 16% concession assumptions built in) and so the losses under the CPA started. With the 30 xjt branded 145s, xjt was able to enter into an agreement with United. Shortly thereafter, the UAL/CAL merger was announced. In other words, it was all pre-planned by CAL/UAL.

Many years later, United decided to transfer the 145s XJT was operating to TSA and CMT. If there are any non-xjt 145XRs operating, they were ALL originally XJT operated since they were the only operator who ever flew them until they were transferred away.
Ho hum. And the bickering begins as we fight over the table scraps. I’m not arguing XJT hasn’t had a rough go of it. All I’m saying is TSA was set to get the UAL contract (pre merger) that XJT undercut at the last minute with their XJT branded grounded 145s. I don’t have any hard feelings about it bc that is the way it goes in the regional world. I only bring it up bc eventually approximately that same number of aircraft years later got transferred from XJT to TSA and it sounded as if some were insinuating that basically the rightful home of those aircraft is with XJT and therefore we shouldn’t care that they are now being taken away from TSA and shutting the airline down. Well if TSA wouldn’t have lost that contract to XJT years prior then those aircraft probably wouldn’t have been transferred to TSA two years ago. TSA, since the jet age, has always been about a 50 aircraft carrier. The contract in 09 would have brought us slightly over that. We currently have about 40 aircraft flying for United. We are now going down to zero. I understand the specific history of those specific aircraft coming from XJT. I also know that we were flying different 145s for United that went away when the XRs came on property. I am not however tracking those aircraft down and arguing they should rightfully come back to TSA. As long as the side of the aircraft says United Express on it, not Trans States and not Express Jet, then those aren’t anyone’s aircraft except United’s to do with as they please.
Reply
Old 03-09-2020 | 03:32 PM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 23
From: It's a plane and it's a seat
Default

It’s all water under the bridge. Time to move on
Reply
Old 03-09-2020 | 05:19 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,233
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by OnTimeEveryTime
TSA, since the jet age, has always been about a 50 aircraft carrier.
I KNOW wikipedia isn't the best source, but, as a general guideline.....

......HOLY COW!!!! TSA has been at that jet age thing for a long time!!!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_Age
Reply
Old 03-09-2020 | 06:34 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by OnTimeEveryTime
Ho hum. And the bickering begins as we fight over the table scraps. I’m not arguing XJT hasn’t had a rough go of it. All I’m saying is TSA was set to get the UAL contract (pre merger) that XJT undercut at the last minute with their XJT branded grounded 145s. I don’t have any hard feelings about it bc that is the way it goes in the regional world. I only bring it up bc eventually approximately that same number of aircraft years later got transferred from XJT to TSA and it sounded as if some were insinuating that basically the rightful home of those aircraft is with XJT and therefore we shouldn’t care that they are now being taken away from TSA and shutting the airline down. Well if TSA wouldn’t have lost that contract to XJT years prior then those aircraft probably wouldn’t have been transferred to TSA two years ago. TSA, since the jet age, has always been about a 50 aircraft carrier. The contract in 09 would have brought us slightly over that. We currently have about 40 aircraft flying for United. We are now going down to zero. I understand the specific history of those specific aircraft coming from XJT. I also know that we were flying different 145s for United that went away when the XRs came on property. I am not however tracking those aircraft down and arguing they should rightfully come back to TSA. As long as the side of the aircraft says United Express on it, not Trans States and not Express Jet, then those aren’t anyone’s aircraft except United’s to do with as they please.

Those airplanes belong to whoever UAL says they belong. In 09, they said they belong to XJT instead of TSA. A few years later, they transferred 36 to TSA. And now they are transferring them back. Next year, they can transfer all of them to CMT.

I’m not at XJT anymore. I was just clarifying the history for you. CAL/UAL were calling the shots in 09/10. There was no need to even bring it up at this point but since you did, I clarified it. That’s all I’m saying.
Reply
Old 03-17-2020 | 08:21 PM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Default The Regional Landscape

IMHO part of the issue is the creation of a large pool of pilots with tons of glass jet time.

Experience that would probably have put you at the top of the stack to get hired at a major in the past, when regionals flew few jets.

Now, that relatively larger pool is competing for a proportionally smaller shot at a majors job.

The carrot has been moved.

You could arrange a staple at the same flying pay on the same planes and it seems like most would be happy.

There's a dwindling number of regional airlines to have bid against each other anyway.

It's not like we don't have good metrics, good safety, and good training at XJT so wouldn't a staple probably improve things overall?
Reply
Old 03-17-2020 | 09:55 PM
  #40  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by YANXJTPilot
IMHO part of the issue is the creation of a large pool of pilots with tons of glass jet time.

Experience that would probably have put you at the top of the stack to get hired at a major in the past, when regionals flew few jets.

Now, that relatively larger pool is competing for a proportionally smaller shot at a majors job.

The carrot has been moved.

You could arrange a staple at the same flying pay on the same planes and it seems like most would be happy.

There's a dwindling number of regional airlines to have bid against each other anyway.

It's not like we don't have good metrics, good safety, and good training at XJT so wouldn't a staple probably improve things overall?
what are you going to staple to? The bottom of the UAL list is about to hit the street for who knows how long? Probably better off sticking it out at XJT now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
forgot to bid
Major
37
02-27-2020 08:58 PM
Makanakis
Trans States Airlines
38
02-03-2017 08:18 PM
Zapata
GoJet
122
07-19-2010 02:35 PM
Foxcow
Regional
200
09-13-2009 09:00 PM
skippy
GoJet
4
05-11-2009 08:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices