![]() |
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3008695)
Nope, you lost your leverage.
|
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3008695)
Nope, you lost your leverage.
|
Bring all RJs on property at commensurate mainline pay, staple pilots to bottom of our list. Simultaneously resolves issues of FFD, scope, furloughs, and putting furloughed UA pilots into the RJs, and damns the regional model to hell, as it should be.
I’d be happy to fly a 175 here, on our seniority list. |
Originally Posted by CrowneVic
(Post 3008786)
Bring all RJs on property at commensurate mainline pay, staple pilots to bottom of our list. Simultaneously resolves issues of FFD, scope, furloughs, and putting furloughed UA pilots into the RJs, and damns the regional model to hell, as it should be.
I’d be happy to fly a 175 here, on our seniority list. Guys always say this, we have the 190 at AA and we’ve forced guys into upgrades on it twice this year, nobody wants to be on it because it pays less than 320/737. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by bababouey
(Post 3008796)
Guys always say this, we have the 190 at AA and we’ve forced guys into upgrades on it twice this year, nobody wants to be on it because it pays less than 320/737.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Is it better for our profession to keep the regional model, then? Yet another tool that allows greedy, corrupt, stock-buyback addicted c-suites to play off against us? You guys at AA should be especially angry. You do know Doug Parker personally pocketed $150M in the last 5 years off your backs, yes? |
Originally Posted by CrowneVic
(Post 3008800)
The 320/737 pay less than the 777. So, your point is what, exactly?
Is it better for our profession to keep the regional model, then? Yet another tool that allows greedy, corrupt, stock-buyback addicted c-suites to play off against us? You guys at AA should be especially angry. You do know Doug Parker personally pocketed $150M in the last 5 years, yes? A 5th year 320 FO makes more than a 2yr 190 CA. 169vs167. Only group where a Jr CA makes less than the most SR FO. |
Originally Posted by CrowneVic
(Post 3008800)
The 320/737 pay less than the 777. So, your point is what, exactly?
Is it better for our profession to keep the regional model, then? Yet another tool that allows greedy, corrupt, stock-buyback addicted c-suites to play off against us? You guys at AA should be especially angry. You do know Doug Parker personally pocketed $150M in the last 5 years off your backs, yes? I don’t like the regional model either, but how would dissolving it alleviate the current crisis? And I’m just pointing out that if little planes were at your airline, they would be avoided like they are here, although I think the 190 will also die a quick death here shortly. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by C5Drvr
(Post 3008808)
A 5th year 320 FO makes more than a 2yr 190 CA. 169vs167. Only group where a Jr CA makes less than the most SR FO.
Sounds like you guys like to keep defending outsourced flying. How’s that worked out for you so far? |
This forum is full blown AIDS.
|
Originally Posted by SlickMachine
(Post 3008821)
This forum is full blown AIDS.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:50 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands