Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Schedule/fleet reductions >

Schedule/fleet reductions

Search

Notices

Schedule/fleet reductions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2020 | 08:09 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default Schedule/fleet reductions

Any armchair quarterbacks have theories about how the fleet reductions, both UAL and UAX, will look for the next couple of months, and also as we pull out of this? Any ideas on the future of our fleet? When the max is available will we take deliveries, or postpone to conserve cash? What about express? Will the 50 seaters find renewed demand, or will they decide to park most of them and let the 70/76 seat jets handle the regional feed at a reduced schedule? We have over 300 of the 50 seat jets spread fairly evenly between the two models and they are getting tired.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 10:12 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
Any armchair quarterbacks have theories about how the fleet reductions, both UAL and UAX, will look for the next couple of months, and also as we pull out of this? Any ideas on the future of our fleet? When the max is available will we take deliveries, or postpone to conserve cash? What about express? Will the 50 seaters find renewed demand, or will they decide to park most of them and let the 70/76 seat jets handle the regional feed at a reduced schedule? We have over 300 of the 50 seat jets spread fairly evenly between the two models and they are getting tired.
United will realize the great value of having 50 seat jets during economic downturns. Cheaper to fly a 200 or a 145 with 20 passengers than a 737/320. Will bring them all mainline, while firing all the Express pilots to prevent them from getting that dream legacy job. Mainline pilots will refuse to fly the older smaller jets, and United will go bankrupt. United will ask the government for another bailout as they try to figure out the problem.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 10:13 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
Any armchair quarterbacks have theories about how the fleet reductions, both UAL and UAX, will look for the next couple of months, and also as we pull out of this? Any ideas on the future of our fleet? When the max is available will we take deliveries, or postpone to conserve cash? What about express? Will the 50 seaters find renewed demand, or will they decide to park most of them and let the 70/76 seat jets handle the regional feed at a reduced schedule? We have over 300 of the 50 seat jets spread fairly evenly between the two models and they are getting tired.
I can’t imagine us taking any MAX planes. Because they are new the capital expenditure and debt loading to the balance sheet would be too much. I’m sure we have an out contractually with Boeing to not take them, and even if we don’t, we just won’t take them. It makes no sense to take new planes. My guess is with diminished loads, the 777s are toast. The 757s and 767s are fully paid off, have a very low cost per seat mile (especially 757-300), and despite them being older planes, they are the cheapest things we have going. I can see those staying around along with the Airbus and NG planes. The 787 is a no brainer, its going to be the new International everything. We just may not take new ones going forward.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 12:52 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
Any armchair quarterbacks have theories about how the fleet reductions, both UAL and UAX, will look for the next couple of months, and also as we pull out of this? Any ideas on the future of our fleet? When the max is available will we take deliveries, or postpone to conserve cash? What about express? Will the 50 seaters find renewed demand, or will they decide to park most of them and let the 70/76 seat jets handle the regional feed at a reduced schedule? We have over 300 of the 50 seat jets spread fairly evenly between the two models and they are getting tired.
That's an odd question coming from the guy or gal who made this comment just last week......

Originally Posted by Itsajob
Pilots everywhere making predictions or ranting about things that they either have no control over, or no clue about.
​​​​​​​
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 12:58 PM
  #5  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: IRP
Default

Originally Posted by My bag will fit
United will realize the great value of having 50 seat jets during economic downturns. Cheaper to fly a 200 or a 145 with 20 passengers than a 737/320. Will bring them all mainline, while firing all the Express pilots to prevent them from getting that dream legacy job. Mainline pilots will refuse to fly the older smaller jets, and United will go bankrupt. United will ask the government for another bailout as they try to figure out the problem.
Holy cow that’s funny
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 01:08 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
That's an odd question coming from the guy or gal who made this comment just last week......


I'm glad I wasn't the only one who noticed that.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 01:09 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by My bag will fit
United will realize the great value of having 50 seat jets during economic downturns. Cheaper to fly a 200 or a 145 with 20 passengers than a 737/320. Will bring them all mainline, while firing all the Express pilots to prevent them from getting that dream legacy job. Mainline pilots will refuse to fly the older smaller jets, and United will go bankrupt. United will ask the government for another bailout as they try to figure out the problem.
That is freaking funny. Well done.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 01:58 PM
  #8  
CLazarus's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 976
Likes: 75
From: NOYB
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
That's an odd question coming from the guy or gal who made this comment just last week......
Nice catch! I have my guesses about what we might do, which are little better than that. But it is generally not worth the time posting them because rather than someone pointing out what I may not have considered... someone inevitably chimes in with a put down more than a point. Kind of takes the fun out of a conversation to have to be on guard.

Fleet moves that reduce the number of jobs at Express and grow mainline instead sound mostly good to me.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 02:36 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by CLazarus
Fleet moves that reduce the number of jobs at Express and grow mainline instead sound mostly good to me.
In addition to mainline aircraft being put into temporary storage, there are also RJs going into storage so this is also going to impact the regionals.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 02:40 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by CLazarus
....on guard.
YOU’RE ON GUARD!!!!!! Couldn’t resist....(cat noise)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetBlast77
Major
4
05-25-2009 11:08 AM
Av8rking
Major
21
12-13-2008 09:53 AM
NWA320pilot
Mergers and Acquisitions
21
12-07-2008 05:28 AM
Splanky
Major
7
09-13-2008 07:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices