Schedule/fleet reductions
#12
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
You’re right, it is an odd question. I don’t pretend to know what is going to, or what should happen. I just find some people’s ideas/speculations interesting, and others entertaining. The reason that I asked is that this is a pivotal moment for the industry. After 9/11 we relaxed scope, the industry ran with it, and we still haven’t recovered. Hopefully this time we have learned a lesson and don’t repeat hard learned lessons. We will be parking some planes, some will come out of storage, others may not. I still wonder about the regional side of the house. Will those tired old 50 seaters find renewed purpose, or will they be parked? If we hold the line on scope, will we look the same coming out of this, or could bringing 100 seat jets to United now make sense? Clueless speculation is what APC is based on, why not enjoy it?
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Any armchair quarterbacks have theories about how the fleet reductions, both UAL and UAX, will look for the next couple of months, and also as we pull out of this? Any ideas on the future of our fleet? When the max is available will we take deliveries, or postpone to conserve cash? What about express? Will the 50 seaters find renewed demand, or will they decide to park most of them and let the 70/76 seat jets handle the regional feed at a reduced schedule? We have over 300 of the 50 seat jets spread fairly evenly between the two models and they are getting tired.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
You’re right, it is an odd question. I don’t pretend to know what is going to, or what should happen. I just find some people’s ideas/speculations interesting, and others entertaining. The reason that I asked is that this is a pivotal moment for the industry. After 9/11 we relaxed scope, the industry ran with it, and we still haven’t recovered. Hopefully this time we have learned a lesson and don’t repeat hard learned lessons. We will be parking some planes, some will come out of storage, others may not. I still wonder about the regional side of the house. Will those tired old 50 seaters find renewed purpose, or will they be parked? If we hold the line on scope, will we look the same coming out of this, or could bringing 100 seat jets to United now make sense? Clueless speculation is what APC is based on, why not enjoy it?
With the company now offering 50 hour SRL lines, the cost of operating 737s and 319/320s just got cheaper and may be cheaper to operate than RJs. In order to operate those additional flights as mainline, it will now cost the company 73 hrs for pilots to fly it vs 50 hrs for pilots to do nothing. That means the marginal additional mainline pilots cost 31% of what they used to.
You can bet that Scott Kirby is calculating the cost comparison using various formulae.
I wouldn't be surprised to see United shed some RJ contracts soon, whether or not they opt to use mainline aircraft on RJ routes.
#15
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Let me just toss this into the mix...
With the company now offering 50 hour SRL lines, the cost of operating 737s and 319/320s just got cheaper and may be cheaper to operate than RJs. In order to operate those additional flights as mainline, it will now cost the company 73 hrs for pilots to fly it vs 50 hrs for pilots to do nothing. That means the marginal additional mainline pilots cost 31% of what they used to.
You can bet that Scott Kirby is calculating the cost comparison using various formulae.
I wouldn't be surprised to see United shed some RJ contracts soon, whether or not they opt to use mainline aircraft on RJ routes.
With the company now offering 50 hour SRL lines, the cost of operating 737s and 319/320s just got cheaper and may be cheaper to operate than RJs. In order to operate those additional flights as mainline, it will now cost the company 73 hrs for pilots to fly it vs 50 hrs for pilots to do nothing. That means the marginal additional mainline pilots cost 31% of what they used to.
You can bet that Scott Kirby is calculating the cost comparison using various formulae.
I wouldn't be surprised to see United shed some RJ contracts soon, whether or not they opt to use mainline aircraft on RJ routes.
#16
You look like a nail
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Let me just toss this into the mix...
With the company now offering 50 hour SRL lines, the cost of operating 737s and 319/320s just got cheaper and may be cheaper to operate than RJs. In order to operate those additional flights as mainline, it will now cost the company 73 hrs for pilots to fly it vs 50 hrs for pilots to do nothing. That means the marginal additional mainline pilots cost 31% of what they used to.
You can bet that Scott Kirby is calculating the cost comparison using various formulae.
I wouldn't be surprised to see United shed some RJ contracts soon, whether or not they opt to use mainline aircraft on RJ routes.
With the company now offering 50 hour SRL lines, the cost of operating 737s and 319/320s just got cheaper and may be cheaper to operate than RJs. In order to operate those additional flights as mainline, it will now cost the company 73 hrs for pilots to fly it vs 50 hrs for pilots to do nothing. That means the marginal additional mainline pilots cost 31% of what they used to.
You can bet that Scott Kirby is calculating the cost comparison using various formulae.
I wouldn't be surprised to see United shed some RJ contracts soon, whether or not they opt to use mainline aircraft on RJ routes.
You realize that the problem is the other side of the equation, right? Revenue has fallen off the cliff and whatever reduction in manpower costs really don’t matter if revenue drops to near zero. I trust the MEC to understand the landscape and negotiate temporary reductions - if needed. It’s disingenuous to think that this isn’t a fight for the future of the company, and I expect that nobody is gonna like what’s coming. That said, no blank checks.
#17
You look like a nail
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
I hope you’re right. I was talking to my mom today. She said that this is reminding her of the polio scare when she was little. It was a horrible disease and people were afraid, but when the vaccine came out and was proven to work, things got back to normal pretty quick. Hopefully when we come up with a vaccine for this illness things will begin to rebound fairly quickly. The economy has been damaged though and will get worse until that time. It’s kind of like letting a bunch of air out of a ball. It will bounce, but only a fool would expect it to bounce as high as it would have before the air was let out. This isn’t going to be a 3 month pause and then business as usual like myself and others initially thought it would, this has grown into a game changer.
#18
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
=Andy;3006850]Let me just toss this into the mix...
With the company now offering 50 hour SRL lines, the cost of operating 737s and 319/320s just got cheaper and may be cheaper to operate than RJs. In order to operate those additional flights as mainline, it will now cost the company 73 hrs for pilots to fly it vs 50 hrs for pilots to do nothing. That means the marginal additional mainline pilots cost 31% of what they used to.
You can bet that Scott Kirby is calculating the cost comparison using various formulae.
I wouldn't be surprised to see United shed some RJ contracts soon, whether or not they opt to use mainline aircraft on RJ routes.
With the company now offering 50 hour SRL lines, the cost of operating 737s and 319/320s just got cheaper and may be cheaper to operate than RJs. In order to operate those additional flights as mainline, it will now cost the company 73 hrs for pilots to fly it vs 50 hrs for pilots to do nothing. That means the marginal additional mainline pilots cost 31% of what they used to.
You can bet that Scott Kirby is calculating the cost comparison using various formulae.
I wouldn't be surprised to see United shed some RJ contracts soon, whether or not they opt to use mainline aircraft on RJ routes.
XJet 175 FO / UAL 737 FO $/hr
4 yr 46/ 161
3 yr 158 / 44
157 / 42
91 / 40
avg 43 / 137
XJet 175 CA / UAL 737 CA
4 yr 87 / 276
85 / 273
83 / 270
81 / 268
avg 84 / 272
127 / 369
34%
You could pay two RJ crews to fly the same hours and still pay 254/369 =only 69% of the mainline pilot rate for one crew, plus the lower overall operating costs and $/seat-mile efficiency (if you can convince travelers to fly on a full non socially-distanced RJ). I don’t have all those costs or the revenue share for UAL to figure it all out, but likely the only reason they don’t swap RJ for mainline lift right now is to some extent the aircraft range, but mostly the contract and union engagement. But if they do, wouldn’t the RJ profitability at these load factors help the SRL’d mainline guys keep their jobs?
#19
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
United will realize the great value of having 50 seat jets during economic downturns. Cheaper to fly a 200 or a 145 with 20 passengers than a 737/320. Will bring them all mainline, while firing all the Express pilots to prevent them from getting that dream legacy job. Mainline pilots will refuse to fly the older smaller jets, and United will go bankrupt. United will ask the government for another bailout as they try to figure out the problem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotorhead
Major
16
06-19-2008 05:27 AM



