Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Schedule/fleet reductions >

Schedule/fleet reductions

Search

Notices

Schedule/fleet reductions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2020 | 03:02 PM
  #11  
ugleeual's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 47
From: 767/757 CA
Default

Meow
.........
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 03:36 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
That's an odd question coming from the guy or gal who made this comment just last week......


You’re right, it is an odd question. I don’t pretend to know what is going to, or what should happen. I just find some people’s ideas/speculations interesting, and others entertaining. The reason that I asked is that this is a pivotal moment for the industry. After 9/11 we relaxed scope, the industry ran with it, and we still haven’t recovered. Hopefully this time we have learned a lesson and don’t repeat hard learned lessons. We will be parking some planes, some will come out of storage, others may not. I still wonder about the regional side of the house. Will those tired old 50 seaters find renewed purpose, or will they be parked? If we hold the line on scope, will we look the same coming out of this, or could bringing 100 seat jets to United now make sense? Clueless speculation is what APC is based on, why not enjoy it?
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 05:14 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
Any armchair quarterbacks have theories about how the fleet reductions, both UAL and UAX, will look for the next couple of months, and also as we pull out of this? Any ideas on the future of our fleet? When the max is available will we take deliveries, or postpone to conserve cash? What about express? Will the 50 seaters find renewed demand, or will they decide to park most of them and let the 70/76 seat jets handle the regional feed at a reduced schedule? We have over 300 of the 50 seat jets spread fairly evenly between the two models and they are getting tired.
Any airplane requiring capex to stay in the fleet will.. leave the fleet.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 05:26 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
You’re right, it is an odd question. I don’t pretend to know what is going to, or what should happen. I just find some people’s ideas/speculations interesting, and others entertaining. The reason that I asked is that this is a pivotal moment for the industry. After 9/11 we relaxed scope, the industry ran with it, and we still haven’t recovered. Hopefully this time we have learned a lesson and don’t repeat hard learned lessons. We will be parking some planes, some will come out of storage, others may not. I still wonder about the regional side of the house. Will those tired old 50 seaters find renewed purpose, or will they be parked? If we hold the line on scope, will we look the same coming out of this, or could bringing 100 seat jets to United now make sense? Clueless speculation is what APC is based on, why not enjoy it?
Let me just toss this into the mix...
With the company now offering 50 hour SRL lines, the cost of operating 737s and 319/320s just got cheaper and may be cheaper to operate than RJs. In order to operate those additional flights as mainline, it will now cost the company 73 hrs for pilots to fly it vs 50 hrs for pilots to do nothing. That means the marginal additional mainline pilots cost 31% of what they used to.
You can bet that Scott Kirby is calculating the cost comparison using various formulae.
I wouldn't be surprised to see United shed some RJ contracts soon, whether or not they opt to use mainline aircraft on RJ routes.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 05:40 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Let me just toss this into the mix...
With the company now offering 50 hour SRL lines, the cost of operating 737s and 319/320s just got cheaper and may be cheaper to operate than RJs. In order to operate those additional flights as mainline, it will now cost the company 73 hrs for pilots to fly it vs 50 hrs for pilots to do nothing. That means the marginal additional mainline pilots cost 31% of what they used to.
You can bet that Scott Kirby is calculating the cost comparison using various formulae.
I wouldn't be surprised to see United shed some RJ contracts soon, whether or not they opt to use mainline aircraft on RJ routes.
I hope you’re right. I was talking to my mom today. She said that this is reminding her of the polio scare when she was little. It was a horrible disease and people were afraid, but when the vaccine came out and was proven to work, things got back to normal pretty quick. Hopefully when we come up with a vaccine for this illness things will begin to rebound fairly quickly. The economy has been damaged though and will get worse until that time. It’s kind of like letting a bunch of air out of a ball. It will bounce, but only a fool would expect it to bounce as high as it would have before the air was let out. This isn’t going to be a 3 month pause and then business as usual like myself and others initially thought it would, this has grown into a game changer.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 06:22 PM
  #16  
You look like a nail
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Let me just toss this into the mix...
With the company now offering 50 hour SRL lines, the cost of operating 737s and 319/320s just got cheaper and may be cheaper to operate than RJs. In order to operate those additional flights as mainline, it will now cost the company 73 hrs for pilots to fly it vs 50 hrs for pilots to do nothing. That means the marginal additional mainline pilots cost 31% of what they used to.
You can bet that Scott Kirby is calculating the cost comparison using various formulae.
I wouldn't be surprised to see United shed some RJ contracts soon, whether or not they opt to use mainline aircraft on RJ routes.

You realize that the problem is the other side of the equation, right? Revenue has fallen off the cliff and whatever reduction in manpower costs really don’t matter if revenue drops to near zero. I trust the MEC to understand the landscape and negotiate temporary reductions - if needed. It’s disingenuous to think that this isn’t a fight for the future of the company, and I expect that nobody is gonna like what’s coming. That said, no blank checks.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 06:24 PM
  #17  
You look like a nail
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
I hope you’re right. I was talking to my mom today. She said that this is reminding her of the polio scare when she was little. It was a horrible disease and people were afraid, but when the vaccine came out and was proven to work, things got back to normal pretty quick. Hopefully when we come up with a vaccine for this illness things will begin to rebound fairly quickly. The economy has been damaged though and will get worse until that time. It’s kind of like letting a bunch of air out of a ball. It will bounce, but only a fool would expect it to bounce as high as it would have before the air was let out. This isn’t going to be a 3 month pause and then business as usual like myself and others initially thought it would, this has grown into a game changer.
Check out Pandemic on Netflix, episode 1 introduces Distributed Bio which is claiming to be 3-4 weeks away from a treatment using antibodies and not a traditional vaccine.
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 06:54 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Default

=Andy;3006850]Let me just toss this into the mix...
With the company now offering 50 hour SRL lines, the cost of operating 737s and 319/320s just got cheaper and may be cheaper to operate than RJs. In order to operate those additional flights as mainline, it will now cost the company 73 hrs for pilots to fly it vs 50 hrs for pilots to do nothing. That means the marginal additional mainline pilots cost 31% of what they used to.
You can bet that Scott Kirby is calculating the cost comparison using various formulae.
I wouldn't be surprised to see United shed some RJ contracts soon, whether or not they opt to use mainline aircraft on RJ routes.
just trying to follow your analysis...I think you meant the marginal additional (sidelined on SRL) pilots cost 50/73hrs = 69% ; ) of what they used to. But the more relevant factor would be the marginal cost of the 50-100 seat lift (at rough avg 34% of the cost in pilot crew pay alone)

XJet 175 FO / UAL 737 FO $/hr
4 yr 46/ 161
3 yr 158 / 44
157 / 42
91 / 40
avg 43 / 137

XJet 175 CA / UAL 737 CA
4 yr 87 / 276
85 / 273
83 / 270
81 / 268
avg 84 / 272

127 / 369
34%

You could pay two RJ crews to fly the same hours and still pay 254/369 =only 69% of the mainline pilot rate for one crew, plus the lower overall operating costs and $/seat-mile efficiency (if you can convince travelers to fly on a full non socially-distanced RJ). I don’t have all those costs or the revenue share for UAL to figure it all out, but likely the only reason they don’t swap RJ for mainline lift right now is to some extent the aircraft range, but mostly the contract and union engagement. But if they do, wouldn’t the RJ profitability at these load factors help the SRL’d mainline guys keep their jobs?
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 07:38 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by My bag will fit
United will realize the great value of having 50 seat jets during economic downturns. Cheaper to fly a 200 or a 145 with 20 passengers than a 737/320. Will bring them all mainline, while firing all the Express pilots to prevent them from getting that dream legacy job. Mainline pilots will refuse to fly the older smaller jets, and United will go bankrupt. United will ask the government for another bailout as they try to figure out the problem.
You guys do get drug tested at United, right?
Reply
Old 03-21-2020 | 07:40 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
In addition to mainline aircraft being put into temporary storage, there are also RJs going into storage so this is also going to impact the regionals.
Which RJs are going into storage?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetBlast77
Major
4
05-25-2009 11:08 AM
Av8rking
Major
21
12-13-2008 09:53 AM
NWA320pilot
Mergers and Acquisitions
21
12-07-2008 05:28 AM
Splanky
Major
7
09-13-2008 07:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices