What were the detailed terms
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by CousinEddie
(Post 3136981)
Wrong. PVSL2 pilots, despite not flying do not create tier move-ups until they turn 65 (or 24 months from DOS, whichever comes first). So even if 655 sign up, it won’t move the tiers at all.
|
With the savings, does this mean the inflight service will get better?
|
Originally Posted by jcool734
(Post 3136984)
What were the detailed terms
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
(Post 3136961)
come cut my grass. 😁
|
Originally Posted by opt0712
(Post 3136989)
With the savings, does this mean the inflight service will get better?
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by duvie
(Post 3136972)
10% less days worked for the top
18% less days for the middle 50% less for the bottom. and the tiers are fluid, especially with potentially 655 new members to the top two. Not to mention some of my WB buddies who’ll bid to a lower tier and commute only twice a month seniority honored and we are all in this together "Days less worked", that is not true. Oh, if only it were that simple. 2:20 Wait till your vacation month rolls around and do the math. Keeping the vacation multiplier at 2:20 will be a paycut for many pilots. Remember the 2:20 comes from 70 hours MPG divided by 30 days. Why did the mulitplier not change to the commensurate MPG? Ah, its just the fine print. Who reads the fine print anyway? And when is going from 70 to 60 a 10% cut? |
Originally Posted by mmm123
(Post 3136976)
I have been negative Andy but have never indicated taking an early out.. I'm still comfortable saying I don't think it will work, but when it doesn't I won't be gloating. I don't get pulled in to the this will have us in better position when it all turns around, I can't believe they sold the group on that statement. I am okay if I'm totally wrong but I will be surprised.Time will tell.
There was another person complaining that he just missed the age limit for the previous early out. Will be interesting to see what he does. Having been furloughed twice from the lazy U, I know how bad it sucks. I'm glad we were able to keep these guys on property a while longer. At this point, it all depends on how fast people will return to flying. And that's going to depend on how long it takes for Covid to be done. I expect at least one of the vaccines in phase 3 trials to be fairly effective for Covid. |
Originally Posted by SystemB
(Post 3136919)
Post-merger UAL is and will remain the best passenger airline to work for. This deal will help ensure that. Still a gamble, but odds are in our favor.
|
Originally Posted by mmm123
(Post 3136976)
I have been negative Andy but have never indicated taking an early out.. I'm still comfortable saying I don't think it will work, but when it doesn't I won't be gloating. I don't get pulled in to the this will have us in better position when it all turns around, I can't believe they sold the group on that statement. I am okay if I'm totally wrong but I will be surprised.Time will tell.
In your(or any other "no" pilot's) opinion what is the absolute rock bottom outcome of this agreement? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:25 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands