Search
Notices

UAL Q3 earnings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2020, 06:47 AM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 59
Default

MOP,

I get that you and others are fans of SK. I agree he has been aggressive. It’s like shooting fish in a barrel when the airlines are printing money with record load factors. How do you reconcile his appearance to rapidly grow mainline on one hand, but on the other he wants a lot of RJs? In his words he “needs to get the pilots to buy in.” How would you guys feel about him if he rolled out 300 shiny new 76,90,110 seat RJs for the regionals?
BenTover is offline  
Old 10-17-2020, 07:02 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,138
Default

Originally Posted by BenTover View Post
MOP,

I get that you and others are fans of SK. I agree he has been aggressive. It’s like shooting fish in a barrel when the airlines are printing money with record load factors. How do you reconcile his appearance to rapidly grow mainline on one hand, but on the other he wants a lot of RJs? In his words he “needs to get the pilots to buy in.” How would you guys feel about him if he rolled out 300 shiny new 76,90,110 seat RJs for the regionals?
i would vote no.

you can’t blame the guy for doing exactly what a CEO should do. We as a pilot group are the ones who ha e to approve it. If there was a scope give in this TA I would have been a hard NO. I’ll take a furlough over giving my job away permanently.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 10-17-2020, 07:50 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

Originally Posted by BenTover View Post
MOP,

I get that you and others are fans of SK. I agree he has been aggressive. It’s like shooting fish in a barrel when the airlines are printing money with record load factors. How do you reconcile his appearance to rapidly grow mainline on one hand, but on the other he wants a lot of RJs? In his words he “needs to get the pilots to buy in.” How would you guys feel about him if he rolled out 300 shiny new 76,90,110 seat RJs for the regionals?


if he brings the A plan back what will you do ? Will you Ben Tover like before ?
Sniper66 is offline  
Old 10-17-2020, 07:51 AM
  #54  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 59
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets View Post
i would vote no.

you can’t blame the guy for doing exactly what a CEO should do. We as a pilot group are the ones who ha e to approve it. If there was a scope give in this TA I would have been a hard NO. I’ll take a furlough over giving my job away permanently.
I agree, a scope give would be a further degradation to our profession. I wasn’t really talking in terms of this agreement. More along the lines of people saying SK is the best and he knows what he is doing. Well, the guy wants a ton of RJs and doesn’t want you in the left seat. SK says I’ll buy a bunch of wide bodies but it’s gonna cost you a ton of RJs at the regionals. The old “we can’t buy and fly both the 400’s and RJs so you choose” dilemma from 23 yrs ago.

Those who elevate him to Messiah can’t have it both ways. “They manage we fly” keeps it a lot simpler. Have a good weekend.
BenTover is offline  
Old 10-17-2020, 07:55 AM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 59
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper66 View Post
if he brings the A plan back what will you do ? Will you Ben Tover like before ?
Care to splain that one?
BenTover is offline  
Old 10-17-2020, 07:58 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 783
Default

You don't have to fawn over SK to appreciate that he is trying to compete. We are a huge company and turning the ship takes incremental change. Saying the American pilots didn't like him is scapegoating for an entire dysfunctional leadership team. If you were Doug Parker you wouldn't want a competent replacement right down the hall. He has been CEO for 20 years now with three dui's and a highly leveraged airline. Remember the PAR Capital and Altitude hedge fund from Boston that almost had 6 board of directors seats and wanted to close IAD and LAX? If we didn't get Kirby when we did that probably would have gained more traction. The woman behind that brilliant plan left about 6 months after Kirby came on board and I don't think that was a coincidence. I am all for being skeptical of management but I am hopeful that this guy can run an airline and benefit us in the long term.
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 10-17-2020, 08:11 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,138
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaticus View Post
You don't have to fawn over SK to appreciate that he is trying to compete. We are a huge company and turning the ship takes incremental change. Saying the American pilots didn't like him is scapegoating for an entire dysfunctional leadership team. If you were Doug Parker you wouldn't want a competent replacement right down the hall. He has been CEO for 20 years now with three dui's and a highly leveraged airline. Remember the PAR Capital and Altitude hedge fund from Boston that almost had 6 board of directors seats and wanted to close IAD and LAX? If we didn't get Kirby when we did that probably would have gained more traction. The woman behind that brilliant plan left about 6 months after Kirby came on board and I don't think that was a coincidence. I am all for being skeptical of management but I am hopeful that this guy can run an airline and benefit us in the long term.
well said. This is Kirbys dream he’s not in it to fail.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 10-17-2020, 08:18 AM
  #58  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 59
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaticus View Post
You don't have to fawn over SK to appreciate that he is trying to compete. We are a huge company and turning the ship takes incremental change. Saying the American pilots didn't like him is scapegoating for an entire dysfunctional leadership team. If you were Doug Parker you wouldn't want a competent replacement right down the hall. He has been CEO for 20 years now with three dui's and a highly leveraged airline. Remember the PAR Capital and Altitude hedge fund from Boston that almost had 6 board of directors seats and wanted to close IAD and LAX? If we didn't get Kirby when we did that probably would have gained more traction. The woman behind that brilliant plan left about 6 months after Kirby came on board and I don't think that was a coincidence. I am all for being skeptical of management but I am hopeful that this guy can run an airline and benefit us in the long term.

It is good he’s trying to compete. I sat in an LEC meeting with a visiting APA official speaking. It was eye opening. Yes, Boston was not into running an airline. But, they do promote the word “Variabilize” and it’s the new airline buzzword. Your last sentence perfectly sums it up.

My concern is people willing to open the contract to help out and the issues we might face in the future.
BenTover is offline  
Old 10-17-2020, 11:53 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

Originally Posted by BenTover View Post
Care to splain that one?

who let the bigger RJs to save their pension ? And of course the pension was gone
answer : UAL MEC Master Chairman ( save the seniors )

How senior are you ?
Sniper66 is offline  
Old 10-17-2020, 01:23 PM
  #60  
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Nucflash's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 730
Default

Originally Posted by BenTover View Post
It is good he’s trying to compete. I sat in an LEC meeting with a visiting APA official speaking. It was eye opening. Yes, Boston was not into running an airline. But, they do promote the word “Variabilize” and it’s the new airline buzzword. Your last sentence perfectly sums it up.

My concern is people willing to open the contract to help out and the issues we might face in the future.
Which LEC meeting was that?
Nucflash is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
krudawg
United
12
01-24-2018 06:41 PM
EZBW
United
131
05-04-2017 08:19 PM
Airhoss
United
210
09-04-2012 06:48 AM
TruthHurts
United
48
04-04-2012 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices