Search

Notices

MAX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-2020 | 07:29 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: JAFO- First Observer
Default

December return of the -8 or -9 is overly optimistic (my personal opinion). The FSB report, which outlines new pilot training requirements, is still in draft and just closed to public comments 11/2. It will take some time for FAA to adjudicate all the comments and finalize the FSB report. After that, airline training programs will have to be revised and approved. Then additional pilot Differences training (NG to Max) can begin. Not to mention all the Airworthiness - AD requirements for RTS. For the future -10, I would hypothesize (3) AOA vanes may be standard equippage.
Reply
Old 11-04-2020 | 07:40 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PerfInit
December return of the -8 or -9 is overly optimistic (my personal opinion). The FSB report, which outlines new pilot training requirements, is still in draft and currently open to public comments. It will take some time for FAA to adjudicate all the comments and finalize the FSB report. After that, airline training programs will have to be revised and approved. Then additional pilot Differences training (NG to Max) can begin. Not to mention all the Airworthiness - AD requirements for RTS. For the future -10, I would hypothesize (3) AOA vanes may be standard equippage.
News media says AA is planning a December rts for the Max. Has AA managed to overcome all these obstacles you say is gonna severely hinder rts?
Reply
Old 11-07-2020 | 03:46 AM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 709
Likes: 6
From: 320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by PerfInit
December return of the -8 or -9 is overly optimistic (my personal opinion). The FSB report, which outlines new pilot training requirements, is still in draft and just closed to public comments 11/2. It will take some time for FAA to adjudicate all the comments and finalize the FSB report. After that, airline training programs will have to be revised and approved. Then additional pilot Differences training (NG to Max) can begin. Not to mention all the Airworthiness - AD requirements for RTS. For the future -10, I would hypothesize (3) AOA vanes may be standard equippage.
EASA approved the Max to return to service with the stipulation that the MAX 10 had to have the third AOA (actual or synthetic) before its first delivery and existing MAX’s would get the retrofits in due time.
Reply
Old 11-07-2020 | 03:55 AM
  #14  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by C11DCA
EASA approved the Max to return to service with the stipulation that the MAX 10 had to have the third AOA (actual or synthetic) before its first delivery and existing MAX’s would get the retrofits in due time.
What is a synthetic AOA? Is it derived from the other two?
Reply
Old 11-07-2020 | 04:09 AM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 709
Likes: 6
From: 320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
What is a synthetic AOA? Is it derived from the other two?
the 787 has a synthetic airspeed that uses the aoa’s and other sources (via gps? Iru’s?) so it could be something like that.

https://www.aviationpros.com/aircraf...light-controls
Reply
Old 11-07-2020 | 04:11 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 406
Likes: 5
From: A320 FO
Default

ERJ 170/190 had 4 pitot tubes. It would derive the AOA from data. They called them “smart probes”. Next time you see one you will notice it doesn’t have a traditional AOA vane.
Reply
Old 11-07-2020 | 06:00 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
Looks like the Max-10 is delayed for a couple years. The Air Current published an article recently that stated Boeing was looking at further modifications to that particular model rather than a clean sheet narrow body design.
There doesn’t seem to be much info on this. All I found was an article where Ryanair said that the planes could be delayed up to two years. When the decision to go with the max was announced, I thought that it made sense because of how many 737’s we have. Now with the benefit of hindsight, I hope that it is delayed and that we cancel the order and place an order for an equal number of 321 NEO’s.
Reply
Old 11-07-2020 | 09:29 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
There doesn’t seem to be much info on this. All I found was an article where Ryanair said that the planes could be delayed up to two years. When the decision to go with the max was announced, I thought that it made sense because of how many 737’s we have. Now with the benefit of hindsight, I hope that it is delayed and that we cancel the order and place an order for an equal number of 321 NEO’s.
agreed. It will be interesting to see what they use for premium Transcontinental flights now that the PW 75s are officially retired. The MAX 10 with lie flats was their planned replacement for those. Do they put lie flats on the MAX 9 or just use the extra “high J” 767s they have sitting around
Reply
Old 11-07-2020 | 11:58 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
agreed. It will be interesting to see what they use for premium Transcontinental flights now that the PW 75s are officially retired. The MAX 10 with lie flats was their planned replacement for those. Do they put lie flats on the MAX 9 or just use the extra “high J” 767s they have sitting around
We’d have to have premium passengers to need a premium seating configuration. Most analysts say that business travel will be slow to recover, and until then the focus will probably be cramming as many as possible into the cheap seats. I imagine that our first class lav policy is ticking our potential premium customers off too. They spend extra or burn miles to sit in a bigger seat and relax or get some work done. Now they just get the bigger seat and have all of the coach passengers lining up to use the front lav. I doubt that lie flat seats are going to be an issue for a while.
Reply
Old 11-07-2020 | 03:05 PM
  #20  
I gets to fly
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
(...Clip...) I imagine that our first class lav policy is ticking our potential premium customers off too. They spend extra or burn miles to sit in a bigger seat and relax or get some work done. Now they just get the bigger seat and have all of the coach passengers lining up to use the front lav. I doubt that lie flat seats are going to be an issue for a while.
What’s the (new?) first class lav policy?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sailingfun
Delta
511
07-25-2022 08:54 AM
docav8tor
Safety
0
11-13-2019 02:54 PM
bay982
Southwest
23
03-30-2016 04:29 AM
ttkcs1998
Safety
3
11-25-2014 11:00 PM
essw
Regional
7
06-27-2009 12:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices