Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
[777] loses cowling on departure from DEN >

[777] loses cowling on departure from DEN

Search
Notices

[777] loses cowling on departure from DEN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2021, 10:16 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

Originally Posted by C5Drvr View Post
The blade inspections take approximately 8 hours per blade, and P&W could only process blades at the rate of 10 sets of 22 per engine per month. 88 total 777-200s delivered worldwide. Not sure how many are still in service total, but it will probably take a while for the worldwide fleet to get inspected. It's gonna be expensive in lost revenue and maintenance.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
We are only talking about P&W powered 200’s. At UAL that is the 777-200 A&B models. The C models and the 300 ER are GE powered. But yeah that APC article is completely incorrect and needs to be retracted.

Does anybody at APC have any accountability what so ever? Anybody at all?
Airhoss is offline  
Old 03-06-2021, 06:48 AM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 30 West
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Especially if they have to do it repetitively on a short interval, didn't this one fail around 2000 hours?
I may be mistaken, but the intervals between inspections is measured in cycles and not hours. I believe the blades on the engine in the DEN incident had about 2600 cycles and after the HNL failure the FAA mandated the inspection interval be reduced to 6500 cycles.
YAKflyer is offline  
Old 03-06-2021, 06:55 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

Originally Posted by YAKflyer View Post
I may be mistaken, but the intervals between inspections is measured in cycles and not hours. I believe the blades on the engine in the DEN incident had about 2600 cycles and after the HNL failure the FAA mandated the inspection interval be reduced to 6500 cycles.
Purely a swag, but my guess is this may be the final nail in the coffin of P&W powered 777’s at UAL. They were talking about retiring the older 200 series 777’s anyway.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 03-06-2021, 08:00 AM
  #124  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
Purely a swag, but my guess is this may be the final nail in the coffin of P&W powered 777’s at UAL. They were talking about retiring the older 200 series 777’s anyway.
They're probably going to have to redesign the blades, not particularly quick or cheap (but better than an N2 problem).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-06-2021, 08:06 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
They're probably going to have to redesign the blades, not particularly quick or cheap (but better than an N2 problem).
My guess is that the older 777 in our fleet are not going to be economically viable in regards to blade redesign.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 03-06-2021, 11:15 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
My guess is that the older 777 in our fleet are not going to be economically viable in regards to blade redesign.
I guess one blessing of long haul being the last market to recover is that we have some time to get replacement aircraft. Who knows......we could actually take delivery of the A350. 😂
Hedley is offline  
Old 03-06-2021, 12:09 PM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
My guess is that the older 777 in our fleet are not going to be economically viable in regards to blade redesign.
I think some of them are amongst the first ones ever built. It may just be time.
TFAYD is offline  
Old 03-06-2021, 03:48 PM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 613
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
They're probably going to have to redesign the blades, not particularly quick or cheap (but better than an N2 problem).
After 26 years in service you think think they are going to redesign the blades? lol.
N6279P is offline  
Old 03-06-2021, 04:23 PM
  #129  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 894
Default

Originally Posted by N6279P View Post
After 26 years in service you think think they are going to redesign the blades? lol.
They probably will. It’s cheap to redesign them. Easy work too, I could probably do it myself in a machine shop.
123494 is offline  
Old 03-06-2021, 05:16 PM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

I'll be amazed if those planes aren't flying somewhere, pax or boxes, 20 years from now. Hell, 727s are still flying.

oldmako is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
David Watts
United
12
12-11-2010 07:21 AM
georgetg
Major
0
12-11-2008 01:09 PM
wannabepilot
Major
32
09-22-2007 01:53 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
1
04-04-2007 06:39 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-04-2005 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices