Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   TRO (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/135348-tro.html)

LeeFXDWG 10-19-2021 04:22 AM


Originally Posted by AxlF16 (Post 3308907)
Isnt it likely that the ~250 in the termination process 'slide' under the TRO umbrella since United was enjoined from refusing to accept late medical or religious accomodations? Wouldn't they be foolish to not apply for medical accomodation?

Hey Axl

Just thought I’d give an update:

ORDER: The Court concludes that Defendant's Motion should be and is GRANTED in part. ECF No.70 . Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-quoted language from the second operative paragraph of the Temporary Restraining Order applies only to those individuals who submitted accommodation requests to Defendant on or before September 23, 2021, and that Defendant is not required to reopen its accommodation review process to consider requests made by individuals on or after September 24, 2021. All other relief requested in Defendant's Motion is DENIED. ECF No.70 . (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/18/2021) (pef)

AxlF16 10-19-2021 09:02 AM


Originally Posted by LeeFXDWG (Post 3311278)
Hey Axl

Just thought I’d give an update:

ORDER: The Court concludes that Defendant's Motion should be and is GRANTED in part. ECF No.70 . Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-quoted language from the second operative paragraph of the Temporary Restraining Order applies only to those individuals who submitted accommodation requests to Defendant on or before September 23, 2021, and that Defendant is not required to reopen its accommodation review process to consider requests made by individuals on or after September 24, 2021. All other relief requested in Defendant's Motion is DENIED. ECF No.70 . (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/18/2021) (pef)

Thanks Lee. I can see a lot of filings on Pacer but I'm too cheap to view them 😀. That ruling sucks for a handful of pilots. Does this ruling change the TRO expiration date?

Heavyflyer 10-20-2021 06:14 AM

When is the hearing scheduled for?

fadec 10-20-2021 03:57 PM

Recognizing exemptions to the free exercise of inalienable rights moves those rights outside the shield of inalienability and paves the way for further infringement. Employees who refused the jab and also refused the exemptions are true patriots so brave and incorruptible that their rarity forced them to fight alone. The rest of you stay drunk on propaganda, trying to forget your inequities and erase the ever burdening shame of compliance. It hurts you to think about these lost brothers who made a principled stand while you continue to cower and obey. Admit it.

Hedley 10-20-2021 06:11 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by fadec (Post 3312070)
employees who refused the jab and also refused the exemptions are true patriots so brave and incorruptible that their rarity forced them to fight alone.

😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

AxlF16 10-20-2021 07:18 PM


Originally Posted by Hedley (Post 3312131)
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

What's the hourly rate and pay guarantee for 'true patriots' these days?

hummingbear 10-20-2021 07:41 PM


Originally Posted by Wingedbeast (Post 3311922)
[Racial and gender inequities] don't actually exist, it's just something those who suffer from a oppression delusion like to spout about their own personal failures.



"Victim complex".... gotta love that projection from someone who probably spouts blm talking points.

Remember when you were young & your grandpa used to say shockingly ignorant things, and you wondered how he could have such little self awareness?

JayAitch 10-20-2021 10:18 PM


Originally Posted by fadec (Post 3312070)
Recognizing exemptions to the free exercise of inalienable rights moves those rights outside the shield of inalienability and paves the way for further infringement.

The free exercise of unalienable rights? What rights are these, specifically?

AxlF16 10-21-2021 07:34 AM

I haven't seen the full order. This is a summary from Pacer Monitor but looks complete.

MEDIATION ORDER: The Court REFERS this case for mediation and APPOINTS Hon. Kent Hance, Chancellor-Emeritus, as Lead Mediator and Hon. Royal Furgeson Related [+], Dean-Emeritus, as Local Mediator. Counsel for the parties are ORDERED to attend an initial, in-person mediation on or before October 26, 2021, at a time and location to be determined by the Lead Mediator. The parties are ORDERED to contact the office of Chancellor Hance by October 22, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. The parties are further ORDERED to submit Preliminary Mediation Reports to Chancellor Hance by October 25, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. Finally, no later than October 29, 2021, at 12:00 p.m., the parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Mediation Report. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/20/2021) (pef)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:53 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands