Hamilton FOOKED UP: Secret Meeting
06-29-2022, 09:26 AM
#21
Super Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,870
Originally Posted by Boeing Aviator
I agree 100%. Now it’s time to do our part and vote No. What percentage did the DAL TA fail by, almost 70%?
It’s up to all each and everyone of us to make sure voter apathy doesn’t allow this TA to pass. Please everyone on this forum please try to reach out to all the United pilots you know and educate those that aren’t as well informed or engaged as those of us on all the various forums and social media groups.
Don’t take anything for granted until the voting period ends. A TA rejection isn’t a forgone conclusion. The MEC propaganda machine and hard pressed sales job and fear campaign will ratchet up significantly over the next several weeks.
It’s up to all each and everyone of us to make sure voter apathy doesn’t allow this TA to pass. Please everyone on this forum please try to reach out to all the United pilots you know and educate those that aren’t as well informed or engaged as those of us on all the various forums and social media groups.
Don’t take anything for granted until the voting period ends. A TA rejection isn’t a forgone conclusion. The MEC propaganda machine and hard pressed sales job and fear campaign will ratchet up significantly over the next several weeks.
IIRC DAL C 2015 TA-1 was rejected by about 66%. Our CEO and our fearless union leaders assured us we would not get a better deal. Our union leadership went bonkers trying to sell us on it but it did not work. We go a much better deal and TA-2 was approved by 82%. Also our rejection had second and third order affects throughout the industry. I think SWA and Possibly FDX both also rejected deals soon after.
Scoop
06-29-2022, 10:26 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Originally Posted by AlettaOcean
To discus how to TURN THE TIDE OF NEGATIVE SENTIMENT TOWARDS THE TA, AS WELL AS ADDRESS THE C11 CHAIRMAN’S LETTER REVERSING HIS VOTE.
AFAIK, MEC officers can't get a do-over on their vote after the matter has been resolved and sent to the membership.
Whether he is sincere or just able to read the tea leaves and is saving his hide, I don't know. That's for the rank and file at C-11 to determine.
One can view Capt Cryster's letter on our ALPA website under the C-11 tab.
06-29-2022, 10:32 AM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Originally Posted by Scoop
IIRC DAL C 2015 TA-1 was rejected by about 66%. Our CEO and our fearless union leaders assured us we would not get a better deal. Our union leadership went bonkers trying to sell us on it but it did not work. We go a much better deal and TA-2 was approved by 82%. Also our rejection had second and third order affects throughout the industry. I think SWA and Possibly FDX both also rejected deals soon after.
Scoop
Scoop
06-29-2022, 11:00 AM
#24
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 58
Originally Posted by Scoop
IIRC DAL C 2015 TA-1 was rejected by about 66%. Our CEO and our fearless union leaders assured us we would not get a better deal. Our union leadership went bonkers trying to sell us on it but it did not work. We go a much better deal and TA-2 was approved by 82%. Also our rejection had second and third order affects throughout the industry. I think SWA and Possibly FDX both also rejected deals soon after.
Scoop
Scoop
06-29-2022, 11:01 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,318
Originally Posted by UofM
It is a guarantee and it will not be a long game.
06-29-2022, 11:03 AM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Awa(k3rE3
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by Andy
That's a mischaracterization of Capt Cryster's (C-11 Chair) letter. He basically stated that he has reevaluated his yes vote as a MEC officer due to inputs from the rank and file. As a result, his vote will be No for the TA. Not as a MEC officer, but as a United pilot.
AFAIK, MEC officers can't get a do-over on their vote after the matter has been resolved and sent to the membership.
Whether he is sincere or just able to read the tea leaves and is saving his hide, I don't know. That's for the rank and file at C-11 to determine.
One can view Capt Cryster's letter on our ALPA website under the C-11 tab.
AFAIK, MEC officers can't get a do-over on their vote after the matter has been resolved and sent to the membership.
Whether he is sincere or just able to read the tea leaves and is saving his hide, I don't know. That's for the rank and file at C-11 to determine.
One can view Capt Cryster's letter on our ALPA website under the C-11 tab.
Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk
06-29-2022, 11:09 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,318
Originally Posted by UALinIAH
Our current contract is already better overall than this TA. It’s really not a difficult choice.
06-29-2022, 11:25 AM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Originally Posted by hummingbear
That’s a fair argument. It’s all about risk vs. reward. Your assessment makes a rejection of the TA a “zero risk” decision without considering the likelihood of a better deal. I’d say we’re roughly in the same neighborhood on that.
I make no guarantees that we'll get a quick turnaround on TA2. However, if it takes a long time to get TA2, I'd be willing to bet it's due to a poor economy. And if it's a poor economy after this passes, I would expect the company to come after the entire TA pay raise along with eliminating most of the add pay - so we'd have worse work rules for the same pay we currently have.
06-29-2022, 01:21 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Originally Posted by Andy
Too many QOL erosions in this TA. The current contract is better than this one. Not worth the 30 shekels that are being offered.
I make no guarantees that we'll get a quick turnaround on TA2. However, if it takes a long time to get TA2, I'd be willing to bet it's due to a poor economy. And if it's a poor economy after this passes, I would expect the company to come after the entire TA pay raise along with eliminating most of the add pay - so we'd have worse work rules for the same pay we currently have.
I make no guarantees that we'll get a quick turnaround on TA2. However, if it takes a long time to get TA2, I'd be willing to bet it's due to a poor economy. And if it's a poor economy after this passes, I would expect the company to come after the entire TA pay raise along with eliminating most of the add pay - so we'd have worse work rules for the same pay we currently have.
06-29-2022, 01:24 PM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 255
Originally Posted by Andy
Too many QOL erosions in this TA. The current contract is better than this one. Not worth the 30 shekels that are being offered.
I make no guarantees that we'll get a quick turnaround on TA2. However, if it takes a long time to get TA2, I'd be willing to bet it's due to a poor economy. And if it's a poor economy after this passes, I would expect the company to come after the entire TA pay raise along with eliminating most of the add pay - so we'd have worse work rules for the same pay we currently have.
I make no guarantees that we'll get a quick turnaround on TA2. However, if it takes a long time to get TA2, I'd be willing to bet it's due to a poor economy. And if it's a poor economy after this passes, I would expect the company to come after the entire TA pay raise along with eliminating most of the add pay - so we'd have worse work rules for the same pay we currently have.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
